草甘膦及其与2,4- d和麦草畏的混合物对产前暴露成年大鼠肠道生化功能、肠道屏障完整性和微生物组组成的影响

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
M.N. Antoniou , R. Mesnage , S. Ferguson , P.M. Nechalioti , L. Cercelaru , A.O. Docea , A. Tsatsakis , D. Kouretas
{"title":"草甘膦及其与2,4- d和麦草畏的混合物对产前暴露成年大鼠肠道生化功能、肠道屏障完整性和微生物组组成的影响","authors":"M.N. Antoniou ,&nbsp;R. Mesnage ,&nbsp;S. Ferguson ,&nbsp;P.M. Nechalioti ,&nbsp;L. Cercelaru ,&nbsp;A.O. Docea ,&nbsp;A. Tsatsakis ,&nbsp;D. Kouretas","doi":"10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.07.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Large scale use of glyphosate herbicides in genetically modified (GM) glyphosate-tolerant cropping and non-GM cropping applications has resulted in the spread of many glyphosate-resistant weed species. As a result, the agricultural biotechnology industry has launched GM crops tolerant to glyphosate plus 2,4-D and to glyphosate plus dicamba. Consequently, people are increasingly exposed to a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives:</h3><div>Our objective was to investigate the effects of glyphosate alone and in combination with 2,4-D and dicamba, using regulatory relevant doses, on gut structure and function in rats.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Pregnant Wistar rats were administered via drinking water from day-6 of gestation with glyphosate at the European Union (EU) no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL; 50 mg/kg bw/day) and acceptable daily intake (ADI; 0.5 mg/kg bw/day), and with a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba, with each at the ADI (0.3 mg/kg bw/day dicamba; 0.02 mg/kg bw/day 2,4-D; 0.5 mg/kg bw/day glyphosate). Offspring continued on this regimen for 13 weeks post-weaning, at which point large and small intestinal tissues and gut content were isolated and analysed for inflammation, gut epithelial integrity, oxidative stress, microbiota composition and histopathology.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Treatment with theglyphosate, dicamba and 2,4-D mixture resulted in increased gut inflammation and permeability (leaky gut), which was associated with oxidative stress and alterations in microbial community composition. The glyphosate NOAEL dose gave similar though less prominent gut inflammation and integrity outcomes but was also associated with oxidative stress. Histological analysis confirmed structural alterations and inflammation in large and small intestine. Effects were more pronounced in the large intestine but no major, significant differences were observed between sexes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion:</h3><div>Our results indicate that exposure to a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba at their respective EU ADI constitutes a potential health hazard with respect to gut structure and function. Our data also suggests that safety (ADI) limits for pesticides should be based on mixtures and not individual “active substances” as currently practised. Outcomes seen from treatment with the EU glyphosate NOAEL dose add to evidence that this value may be incorrect and thus the ADI too high.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23206,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology letters","volume":"411 ","pages":"Page S21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"S07-03 Impact of Glyphosate and its Mixture with 2,4-D and Dicamba on Gut Biochemical Function, Intestinal Barrier Integrity and Microbiome Composition in Adult Rats with Prenatal Commencement of Exposure\",\"authors\":\"M.N. Antoniou ,&nbsp;R. Mesnage ,&nbsp;S. Ferguson ,&nbsp;P.M. Nechalioti ,&nbsp;L. Cercelaru ,&nbsp;A.O. Docea ,&nbsp;A. Tsatsakis ,&nbsp;D. Kouretas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.07.066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Large scale use of glyphosate herbicides in genetically modified (GM) glyphosate-tolerant cropping and non-GM cropping applications has resulted in the spread of many glyphosate-resistant weed species. As a result, the agricultural biotechnology industry has launched GM crops tolerant to glyphosate plus 2,4-D and to glyphosate plus dicamba. Consequently, people are increasingly exposed to a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives:</h3><div>Our objective was to investigate the effects of glyphosate alone and in combination with 2,4-D and dicamba, using regulatory relevant doses, on gut structure and function in rats.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Pregnant Wistar rats were administered via drinking water from day-6 of gestation with glyphosate at the European Union (EU) no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL; 50 mg/kg bw/day) and acceptable daily intake (ADI; 0.5 mg/kg bw/day), and with a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba, with each at the ADI (0.3 mg/kg bw/day dicamba; 0.02 mg/kg bw/day 2,4-D; 0.5 mg/kg bw/day glyphosate). Offspring continued on this regimen for 13 weeks post-weaning, at which point large and small intestinal tissues and gut content were isolated and analysed for inflammation, gut epithelial integrity, oxidative stress, microbiota composition and histopathology.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Treatment with theglyphosate, dicamba and 2,4-D mixture resulted in increased gut inflammation and permeability (leaky gut), which was associated with oxidative stress and alterations in microbial community composition. The glyphosate NOAEL dose gave similar though less prominent gut inflammation and integrity outcomes but was also associated with oxidative stress. Histological analysis confirmed structural alterations and inflammation in large and small intestine. Effects were more pronounced in the large intestine but no major, significant differences were observed between sexes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion:</h3><div>Our results indicate that exposure to a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba at their respective EU ADI constitutes a potential health hazard with respect to gut structure and function. Our data also suggests that safety (ADI) limits for pesticides should be based on mixtures and not individual “active substances” as currently practised. Outcomes seen from treatment with the EU glyphosate NOAEL dose add to evidence that this value may be incorrect and thus the ADI too high.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology letters\",\"volume\":\"411 \",\"pages\":\"Page S21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427425016492\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427425016492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在转基因(GM)耐草甘膦作物和非转基因作物中大规模使用草甘膦除草剂已经导致许多抗草甘膦杂草物种的传播。因此,农业生物技术产业推出了耐草甘膦+ 2,4- d和耐草甘膦+麦草畏的转基因作物。因此,人们越来越多地接触到草甘膦、2,4- d和麦草畏的混合物。目的:我们的目的是研究草甘膦单独使用和与2,4- d和麦草畏联合使用(使用调节相关剂量)对大鼠肠道结构和功能的影响。方法:妊娠Wistar大鼠从妊娠第6天开始饮用符合欧盟(EU)无观察到不良反应水平(NOAEL; 50 mg/kg bw/day)和可接受日摄入量(ADI; 0.5 mg/kg bw/day)的草甘膦,以及草甘膦、2,4- d和麦草畏的混合物,各按ADI(麦草畏0.3 mg/kg bw/day; 2,4- d 0.02 mg/kg bw/day;草甘膦0.5 mg/kg bw/day)给药。幼崽在断奶后继续使用该方案13周,此时分离出大小肠道组织和肠道内容物,并分析炎症、肠道上皮完整性、氧化应激、微生物群组成和组织病理学。结果:草甘膦、麦草畏和2,4- d混合物导致肠道炎症和渗透性(漏肠)增加,这与氧化应激和微生物群落组成的改变有关。草甘膦NOAEL剂量虽然不太突出,但也与氧化应激有关,但具有类似的肠道炎症和完整性结果。组织学分析证实大肠和小肠结构改变和炎症。效果在大肠中更为明显,但在两性之间没有观察到重大的、显著的差异。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,暴露于草甘膦、2,4- d和麦草畏的混合物中,其各自的欧盟ADI对肠道结构和功能构成潜在的健康危害。我们的数据还表明,农药的安全(ADI)限值应该基于混合物,而不是目前实践的单个“活性物质”。使用欧盟草甘膦NOAEL剂量治疗的结果进一步证明,该值可能不正确,因此ADI过高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
S07-03 Impact of Glyphosate and its Mixture with 2,4-D and Dicamba on Gut Biochemical Function, Intestinal Barrier Integrity and Microbiome Composition in Adult Rats with Prenatal Commencement of Exposure

Background:

Large scale use of glyphosate herbicides in genetically modified (GM) glyphosate-tolerant cropping and non-GM cropping applications has resulted in the spread of many glyphosate-resistant weed species. As a result, the agricultural biotechnology industry has launched GM crops tolerant to glyphosate plus 2,4-D and to glyphosate plus dicamba. Consequently, people are increasingly exposed to a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba.

Objectives:

Our objective was to investigate the effects of glyphosate alone and in combination with 2,4-D and dicamba, using regulatory relevant doses, on gut structure and function in rats.

Methods:

Pregnant Wistar rats were administered via drinking water from day-6 of gestation with glyphosate at the European Union (EU) no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL; 50 mg/kg bw/day) and acceptable daily intake (ADI; 0.5 mg/kg bw/day), and with a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba, with each at the ADI (0.3 mg/kg bw/day dicamba; 0.02 mg/kg bw/day 2,4-D; 0.5 mg/kg bw/day glyphosate). Offspring continued on this regimen for 13 weeks post-weaning, at which point large and small intestinal tissues and gut content were isolated and analysed for inflammation, gut epithelial integrity, oxidative stress, microbiota composition and histopathology.

Results:

Treatment with theglyphosate, dicamba and 2,4-D mixture resulted in increased gut inflammation and permeability (leaky gut), which was associated with oxidative stress and alterations in microbial community composition. The glyphosate NOAEL dose gave similar though less prominent gut inflammation and integrity outcomes but was also associated with oxidative stress. Histological analysis confirmed structural alterations and inflammation in large and small intestine. Effects were more pronounced in the large intestine but no major, significant differences were observed between sexes.

Discussion:

Our results indicate that exposure to a mixture of glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba at their respective EU ADI constitutes a potential health hazard with respect to gut structure and function. Our data also suggests that safety (ADI) limits for pesticides should be based on mixtures and not individual “active substances” as currently practised. Outcomes seen from treatment with the EU glyphosate NOAEL dose add to evidence that this value may be incorrect and thus the ADI too high.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicology letters
Toxicology letters 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
897
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: An international journal for the rapid publication of novel reports on a range of aspects of toxicology, especially mechanisms of toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信