Xinyuan Dang , Qingyuan Hong , Wanqin Liu , Yibo Wang
{"title":"中国遗产治理蓝图:重新审视演进轨迹,重构制度优先事项,绘制国家遗产名录","authors":"Xinyuan Dang , Qingyuan Hong , Wanqin Liu , Yibo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's heritage conservation system is at a pivotal moment, navigating the intersection of historical preservation and rapid socio-economic transformation. While UNESCO world heritage sites often dominate global discussions, China's extensive registry of over five thousand major cultural heritage sites under national-level protection remains comparatively underexplored. This paper introduces a comprehensive ‘heritage governance blueprint’, integrating elements such as historical evolution, stakeholder interactions, policy and practice shifts, research priorities and tempo-spatial-typological mapping of the national heritage registry. The proposed framework identifies a hybrid governance model, blending centralized regulation with localized experimentation and technocratic innovation. It not only documents the progression of regulatory policies and stakeholder interactions but also utilizes geocoded datasets and clustering algorithms to visualize heritage assets. Findings from diverse materials — policy documents, national research grant data and heritage registries — highlight the transition from traditional rescue-based restoration toward more advanced practices including environmental monitoring, preventive conservation, digital twin technologies and the heritage revitalization endeavors within broader development narratives. The study makes a dual contribution. Theoretically, it recontextualizes global heritage norms, such as authenticity and conservation, within China's developmentalist framework. Methodologically, it bridges qualitative and quantitative approaches, offering a new paradigm for heritage governance. This hybrid governance model holds significant relevance for development-intensive nations and opens the door for future comparative studies and more inclusive global discourse on cultural heritage conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 103541"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China's heritage governance blueprint: Revisiting evolutionary trajectories, reframing institutional priorities and mapping the national registry\",\"authors\":\"Xinyuan Dang , Qingyuan Hong , Wanqin Liu , Yibo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China's heritage conservation system is at a pivotal moment, navigating the intersection of historical preservation and rapid socio-economic transformation. While UNESCO world heritage sites often dominate global discussions, China's extensive registry of over five thousand major cultural heritage sites under national-level protection remains comparatively underexplored. This paper introduces a comprehensive ‘heritage governance blueprint’, integrating elements such as historical evolution, stakeholder interactions, policy and practice shifts, research priorities and tempo-spatial-typological mapping of the national heritage registry. The proposed framework identifies a hybrid governance model, blending centralized regulation with localized experimentation and technocratic innovation. It not only documents the progression of regulatory policies and stakeholder interactions but also utilizes geocoded datasets and clustering algorithms to visualize heritage assets. Findings from diverse materials — policy documents, national research grant data and heritage registries — highlight the transition from traditional rescue-based restoration toward more advanced practices including environmental monitoring, preventive conservation, digital twin technologies and the heritage revitalization endeavors within broader development narratives. The study makes a dual contribution. Theoretically, it recontextualizes global heritage norms, such as authenticity and conservation, within China's developmentalist framework. Methodologically, it bridges qualitative and quantitative approaches, offering a new paradigm for heritage governance. This hybrid governance model holds significant relevance for development-intensive nations and opens the door for future comparative studies and more inclusive global discourse on cultural heritage conservation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Habitat International\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Habitat International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525002577\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525002577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
China's heritage governance blueprint: Revisiting evolutionary trajectories, reframing institutional priorities and mapping the national registry
China's heritage conservation system is at a pivotal moment, navigating the intersection of historical preservation and rapid socio-economic transformation. While UNESCO world heritage sites often dominate global discussions, China's extensive registry of over five thousand major cultural heritage sites under national-level protection remains comparatively underexplored. This paper introduces a comprehensive ‘heritage governance blueprint’, integrating elements such as historical evolution, stakeholder interactions, policy and practice shifts, research priorities and tempo-spatial-typological mapping of the national heritage registry. The proposed framework identifies a hybrid governance model, blending centralized regulation with localized experimentation and technocratic innovation. It not only documents the progression of regulatory policies and stakeholder interactions but also utilizes geocoded datasets and clustering algorithms to visualize heritage assets. Findings from diverse materials — policy documents, national research grant data and heritage registries — highlight the transition from traditional rescue-based restoration toward more advanced practices including environmental monitoring, preventive conservation, digital twin technologies and the heritage revitalization endeavors within broader development narratives. The study makes a dual contribution. Theoretically, it recontextualizes global heritage norms, such as authenticity and conservation, within China's developmentalist framework. Methodologically, it bridges qualitative and quantitative approaches, offering a new paradigm for heritage governance. This hybrid governance model holds significant relevance for development-intensive nations and opens the door for future comparative studies and more inclusive global discourse on cultural heritage conservation.
期刊介绍:
Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.