{"title":"基于Gowin学习理论和Vee启发式的普通化学核心概念与能力的关联","authors":"Vijay S. Vyas*, and , Scott A. Reid*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The content in introductory science courses has often been criticized as “<i>miles wide and inches deep</i>”. In general chemistry, several revisions have focused on framing around a set of core or anchoring concepts, and we recently adapted the anchoring concepts content map (ACCM) of the American Chemical Society (ACS) to develop an anchoring concept-based curriculum for our general chemistry courses. In this article, we describe efforts to connect this curriculum with laboratory learning using Gowin’s theory of learning and the associated knowledge Vee heuristic. Within this framework, the laboratories themselves become events connecting the conceptual and methodological domains, with elements in the heuristic representing key epistemological components that are central to the generation of new knowledge and/or meaning. In carrying out this approach, our general chemistry course was redesigned into a set of three-week modules, each centered around a core learning objective and anchoring concept. In each module, students conducted 2 weeks of laboratory experiments closely connected to the module theme. In the third week, oral presentations were given in teams where, modeled on the format of a scientific article, one team each was assigned to present on: 1) <i>Introduction and Background</i>, 2) <i>Methods and Materials</i>, 3) <i>Results</i>, and 4) <i>Discussion</i>. These assignments rotated over the semester, and the discussion group for each module was tasked with writing a detailed (3–5 page) reflective written discussion, with opportunity given for revision. This article describes the initial implementations and outcomes of this approach in a majors general chemistry sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 9","pages":"3962–3971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking Core Concepts and Competencies in General Chemistry via Gowin’s Theory of Learning and Vee Heuristic\",\"authors\":\"Vijay S. Vyas*, and , Scott A. Reid*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The content in introductory science courses has often been criticized as “<i>miles wide and inches deep</i>”. In general chemistry, several revisions have focused on framing around a set of core or anchoring concepts, and we recently adapted the anchoring concepts content map (ACCM) of the American Chemical Society (ACS) to develop an anchoring concept-based curriculum for our general chemistry courses. In this article, we describe efforts to connect this curriculum with laboratory learning using Gowin’s theory of learning and the associated knowledge Vee heuristic. Within this framework, the laboratories themselves become events connecting the conceptual and methodological domains, with elements in the heuristic representing key epistemological components that are central to the generation of new knowledge and/or meaning. In carrying out this approach, our general chemistry course was redesigned into a set of three-week modules, each centered around a core learning objective and anchoring concept. In each module, students conducted 2 weeks of laboratory experiments closely connected to the module theme. In the third week, oral presentations were given in teams where, modeled on the format of a scientific article, one team each was assigned to present on: 1) <i>Introduction and Background</i>, 2) <i>Methods and Materials</i>, 3) <i>Results</i>, and 4) <i>Discussion</i>. These assignments rotated over the semester, and the discussion group for each module was tasked with writing a detailed (3–5 page) reflective written discussion, with opportunity given for revision. This article describes the initial implementations and outcomes of this approach in a majors general chemistry sequence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 9\",\"pages\":\"3962–3971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00549\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Linking Core Concepts and Competencies in General Chemistry via Gowin’s Theory of Learning and Vee Heuristic
The content in introductory science courses has often been criticized as “miles wide and inches deep”. In general chemistry, several revisions have focused on framing around a set of core or anchoring concepts, and we recently adapted the anchoring concepts content map (ACCM) of the American Chemical Society (ACS) to develop an anchoring concept-based curriculum for our general chemistry courses. In this article, we describe efforts to connect this curriculum with laboratory learning using Gowin’s theory of learning and the associated knowledge Vee heuristic. Within this framework, the laboratories themselves become events connecting the conceptual and methodological domains, with elements in the heuristic representing key epistemological components that are central to the generation of new knowledge and/or meaning. In carrying out this approach, our general chemistry course was redesigned into a set of three-week modules, each centered around a core learning objective and anchoring concept. In each module, students conducted 2 weeks of laboratory experiments closely connected to the module theme. In the third week, oral presentations were given in teams where, modeled on the format of a scientific article, one team each was assigned to present on: 1) Introduction and Background, 2) Methods and Materials, 3) Results, and 4) Discussion. These assignments rotated over the semester, and the discussion group for each module was tasked with writing a detailed (3–5 page) reflective written discussion, with opportunity given for revision. This article describes the initial implementations and outcomes of this approach in a majors general chemistry sequence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.