{"title":"从发光中认识:荧光实验室关于可视化对有意义学习影响的证据","authors":"Mustafa Demirbuga, and , Donald. J. Wink*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Fluorescence experiments hold great potential to develop and deepen student understanding of fundamental chemical concepts because the phenomenon is engaging and also illustrates many different chemical concepts and applications, including in quantum mechanics, spectroscopy, kinetics, equilibrium, and stoichiometry, through easily observable effects. Thus, many fluorescence experiments have been published for higher education. However, less attention has been given to analyzing students’ actual learning and experiences in systematic ways. In this paper, we share findings from interviews with students who completed three different fluorescence laboratory experiments in general chemistry courses at an urban public commuter university, analyzed through the lens of meaningful learning. Interview data for the affective learning dimension of meaningful learning was done with Galloway et al.’s 18-word affective matrix with addition of a new category that emerged strongly in the interviews: “enjoyed”. Interview transcripts were also analyzed for elements corresponding to the psychomotor and cognitive domains of meaningful learning. Results documented how important the affective and psychomotor domains were to students’ experiences in this setting. In addition to the three domains of meaningful learning, we also documented the particular role of the process of “visualization” to the students and examined how students connected their observations to molecular-level processes and corresponding models using Johnstone’s triangle as a framework. Our findings indicate that students primarily engaged with and appreciated the psychomotor domain and the visualization at the macroscopic level of the fluorescence experiments, which contributed to their understanding of the submicroscopic level but not at the symbolic level. By engaging students in the affective domain, the visually compelling experiments support deeper connections between macroscopic observations and submicroscopic models. We hope that this research informs future directions in designing curriculum and supports the effective integration of fluorescence experiments into general chemistry instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 9","pages":"3828–3839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing from Glowing: Evidence from Fluorescence Laboratories on the Impact of Visualization on Meaningful Learning\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Demirbuga, and , Donald. J. Wink*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Fluorescence experiments hold great potential to develop and deepen student understanding of fundamental chemical concepts because the phenomenon is engaging and also illustrates many different chemical concepts and applications, including in quantum mechanics, spectroscopy, kinetics, equilibrium, and stoichiometry, through easily observable effects. Thus, many fluorescence experiments have been published for higher education. However, less attention has been given to analyzing students’ actual learning and experiences in systematic ways. In this paper, we share findings from interviews with students who completed three different fluorescence laboratory experiments in general chemistry courses at an urban public commuter university, analyzed through the lens of meaningful learning. Interview data for the affective learning dimension of meaningful learning was done with Galloway et al.’s 18-word affective matrix with addition of a new category that emerged strongly in the interviews: “enjoyed”. Interview transcripts were also analyzed for elements corresponding to the psychomotor and cognitive domains of meaningful learning. Results documented how important the affective and psychomotor domains were to students’ experiences in this setting. In addition to the three domains of meaningful learning, we also documented the particular role of the process of “visualization” to the students and examined how students connected their observations to molecular-level processes and corresponding models using Johnstone’s triangle as a framework. Our findings indicate that students primarily engaged with and appreciated the psychomotor domain and the visualization at the macroscopic level of the fluorescence experiments, which contributed to their understanding of the submicroscopic level but not at the symbolic level. By engaging students in the affective domain, the visually compelling experiments support deeper connections between macroscopic observations and submicroscopic models. We hope that this research informs future directions in designing curriculum and supports the effective integration of fluorescence experiments into general chemistry instruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 9\",\"pages\":\"3828–3839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00574\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowing from Glowing: Evidence from Fluorescence Laboratories on the Impact of Visualization on Meaningful Learning
Fluorescence experiments hold great potential to develop and deepen student understanding of fundamental chemical concepts because the phenomenon is engaging and also illustrates many different chemical concepts and applications, including in quantum mechanics, spectroscopy, kinetics, equilibrium, and stoichiometry, through easily observable effects. Thus, many fluorescence experiments have been published for higher education. However, less attention has been given to analyzing students’ actual learning and experiences in systematic ways. In this paper, we share findings from interviews with students who completed three different fluorescence laboratory experiments in general chemistry courses at an urban public commuter university, analyzed through the lens of meaningful learning. Interview data for the affective learning dimension of meaningful learning was done with Galloway et al.’s 18-word affective matrix with addition of a new category that emerged strongly in the interviews: “enjoyed”. Interview transcripts were also analyzed for elements corresponding to the psychomotor and cognitive domains of meaningful learning. Results documented how important the affective and psychomotor domains were to students’ experiences in this setting. In addition to the three domains of meaningful learning, we also documented the particular role of the process of “visualization” to the students and examined how students connected their observations to molecular-level processes and corresponding models using Johnstone’s triangle as a framework. Our findings indicate that students primarily engaged with and appreciated the psychomotor domain and the visualization at the macroscopic level of the fluorescence experiments, which contributed to their understanding of the submicroscopic level but not at the symbolic level. By engaging students in the affective domain, the visually compelling experiments support deeper connections between macroscopic observations and submicroscopic models. We hope that this research informs future directions in designing curriculum and supports the effective integration of fluorescence experiments into general chemistry instruction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.