线粒体基因组的全面采样证实了陆生植物的新元古代起源。

IF 11.6 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Shuai-Ya Hu, Gongle Shi, Cheng-Ao Yang, Yves Van de Peer, Zhen Li, Jia-Yu Xue
{"title":"线粒体基因组的全面采样证实了陆生植物的新元古代起源。","authors":"Shuai-Ya Hu, Gongle Shi, Cheng-Ao Yang, Yves Van de Peer, Zhen Li, Jia-Yu Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular phylogenetics illustrates the evolution and divergence of green plants by employing sequence data from various sources. Interestingly, phylogenetic reconstruction based on mitochondrial genes tends to exhibit incongruence with those derived from nuclear and chloroplast genes. Although the uniparental inheritance and conservatively retained protein-coding genes of mitochondrial genomes inherently exclude certain potential factors that affect phylogenetic reconstruction, such as hybridization and gene loss, the utilization of mitochondrial genomes for phylogeny and divergence time estimation remains limited. Here, we meticulously assembled a comprehensive dataset comprising 565 mitochondrial genomes spanning all major lineages of green plants. Using multiple partitions and phylogenetic models, our phylogenies based on mitochondrial genes support paraphyly for both bryophytes and charophytes, place hornworts (Anthocerotaceae) as sister to all tracheophytes, and recover stonewort (Charophyceae) as sister to land plants. We systematically assessed potential impact factors in mitochondrial coding sequences, such as GC-content heterogeneity and codon-usage bias. Further, by rigorously testing seven different dating strategies, we examined the impact of various confounding factors that may affect divergence time estimation, including various numbers and prior settings of fossil calibrations, and rate heterogeneity among sites and across lineages. Our dating results support a Neoproterozoic origin (i.e., Crown age) of land plants and a Triassic origin of angiosperms, as also supported by nuclear data. In conclusion, we particularly underscore the significance of exploring different partitioning strategies and addressing among-lineage heterogeneity in both phylogenetic and dating analyses by extending sampling combined with meticulous data pruning to mitigate the influence of systematic errors in phylogenetic inference.</p>","PeriodicalId":52373,"journal":{"name":"Plant Communications","volume":" ","pages":"101497"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive sampling from mitochondrial genomes substantiates the Neoproterozoic origin of land plants.\",\"authors\":\"Shuai-Ya Hu, Gongle Shi, Cheng-Ao Yang, Yves Van de Peer, Zhen Li, Jia-Yu Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Molecular phylogenetics illustrates the evolution and divergence of green plants by employing sequence data from various sources. Interestingly, phylogenetic reconstruction based on mitochondrial genes tends to exhibit incongruence with those derived from nuclear and chloroplast genes. Although the uniparental inheritance and conservatively retained protein-coding genes of mitochondrial genomes inherently exclude certain potential factors that affect phylogenetic reconstruction, such as hybridization and gene loss, the utilization of mitochondrial genomes for phylogeny and divergence time estimation remains limited. Here, we meticulously assembled a comprehensive dataset comprising 565 mitochondrial genomes spanning all major lineages of green plants. Using multiple partitions and phylogenetic models, our phylogenies based on mitochondrial genes support paraphyly for both bryophytes and charophytes, place hornworts (Anthocerotaceae) as sister to all tracheophytes, and recover stonewort (Charophyceae) as sister to land plants. We systematically assessed potential impact factors in mitochondrial coding sequences, such as GC-content heterogeneity and codon-usage bias. Further, by rigorously testing seven different dating strategies, we examined the impact of various confounding factors that may affect divergence time estimation, including various numbers and prior settings of fossil calibrations, and rate heterogeneity among sites and across lineages. Our dating results support a Neoproterozoic origin (i.e., Crown age) of land plants and a Triassic origin of angiosperms, as also supported by nuclear data. In conclusion, we particularly underscore the significance of exploring different partitioning strategies and addressing among-lineage heterogeneity in both phylogenetic and dating analyses by extending sampling combined with meticulous data pruning to mitigate the influence of systematic errors in phylogenetic inference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101497\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Communications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分子系统遗传学利用不同来源的序列数据说明了绿色植物的进化和分化。有趣的是,基于线粒体基因的系统发育重建往往与来自核和叶绿体基因的系统发育重建不一致。尽管线粒体基因组的单代遗传和保守保留的蛋白质编码基因固有地排除了某些影响系统发育重建的潜在因素,如杂交和基因丢失,但线粒体基因组用于系统发育和分化时间估计的利用仍然有限。在这里,我们精心组装了一个包含565个线粒体基因组的综合数据集,涵盖了绿色植物的所有主要谱系。利用多重划分和系统发育模型,我们基于线粒体基因的系统发育支持苔藓植物和蕨类植物的共生,将角苔(anthocerotacae)作为所有管生植物的姐妹植物,并恢复石苔(Charophyceae)作为陆地植物的姐妹植物。我们系统地评估了线粒体编码序列的潜在影响因素,如gc含量异质性和密码子使用偏差。此外,通过严格测试七种不同的测年策略,我们检查了各种可能影响分化时间估计的混杂因素的影响,包括不同数量和化石校准的先前设置,以及地点和谱系之间的速率异质性。我们的测年结果支持陆生植物的新元古代起源(即树冠年龄)和被子植物的三叠纪起源,核数据也支持这一点。总之,我们特别强调了在系统发育和年代分析中探索不同划分策略和解决谱系间异质性的重要性,通过扩大采样结合细致的数据修剪来减轻系统发育推断中的系统误差的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive sampling from mitochondrial genomes substantiates the Neoproterozoic origin of land plants.

Molecular phylogenetics illustrates the evolution and divergence of green plants by employing sequence data from various sources. Interestingly, phylogenetic reconstruction based on mitochondrial genes tends to exhibit incongruence with those derived from nuclear and chloroplast genes. Although the uniparental inheritance and conservatively retained protein-coding genes of mitochondrial genomes inherently exclude certain potential factors that affect phylogenetic reconstruction, such as hybridization and gene loss, the utilization of mitochondrial genomes for phylogeny and divergence time estimation remains limited. Here, we meticulously assembled a comprehensive dataset comprising 565 mitochondrial genomes spanning all major lineages of green plants. Using multiple partitions and phylogenetic models, our phylogenies based on mitochondrial genes support paraphyly for both bryophytes and charophytes, place hornworts (Anthocerotaceae) as sister to all tracheophytes, and recover stonewort (Charophyceae) as sister to land plants. We systematically assessed potential impact factors in mitochondrial coding sequences, such as GC-content heterogeneity and codon-usage bias. Further, by rigorously testing seven different dating strategies, we examined the impact of various confounding factors that may affect divergence time estimation, including various numbers and prior settings of fossil calibrations, and rate heterogeneity among sites and across lineages. Our dating results support a Neoproterozoic origin (i.e., Crown age) of land plants and a Triassic origin of angiosperms, as also supported by nuclear data. In conclusion, we particularly underscore the significance of exploring different partitioning strategies and addressing among-lineage heterogeneity in both phylogenetic and dating analyses by extending sampling combined with meticulous data pruning to mitigate the influence of systematic errors in phylogenetic inference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Communications
Plant Communications Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Communications is an open access publishing platform that supports the global plant science community. It publishes original research, review articles, technical advances, and research resources in various areas of plant sciences. The scope of topics includes evolution, ecology, physiology, biochemistry, development, reproduction, metabolism, molecular and cellular biology, genetics, genomics, environmental interactions, biotechnology, breeding of higher and lower plants, and their interactions with other organisms. The goal of Plant Communications is to provide a high-quality platform for the dissemination of plant science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信