{"title":"数学模型表明,目前的car -巨噬细胞剂量对低输注前肿瘤负荷有效,但对高肿瘤负荷难以耐受。","authors":"Shilian Xu , Maoxuan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2025.112263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-macrophage therapy is a promising approach for tumour treatment due to antigen-specific phagocytosis and tumour clearance. However, the precise impact of tumour burden, dose and dosing regimens on therapeutic outcomes remains poorly understood. We developed ordinary differential equation (ODE) mathematical modelling and utilised parameter inference to analyse <em>in vitro</em> FACS-based phagocytosis assay data testing CD19-positive Raji tumour cell against CAR-macrophage, and revealed that phagocytosing efficiency of CAR-macrophage increases but saturates as both Raji cell and CAR-macrophage concentrations increase. This interaction resulted in bistable Raji cell kinetics; specifically, within a particular range of CAR-macrophage concentration, low tumour burdens are effectively inhibited, while high tumour burdens remain refractory. Furthermore, our model predicted that CAR-macrophage dosages typically suggested by current clinical trials yield favourable therapeutic outcomes only when tumour burden is low. For split CAR-macrophage infusion with fixed total dosage, the first infusion with high CAR-macrophage dose delivers superior treatment outcomes. Finally, we identified alternative infusion regimens: five billion cells administered monthly for three months, or seven billion cells every two months for six months, can efficiently suppress Raji cell replication irrespective of tumour burden. Our findings highlight CAR-macrophage therapeutic outcomes are strongly influenced by both tumour burden and different dosing regimens. This work underscores that reducing tumour burden, increasing CAR-macrophage dose in the first infusion and prolonging CAR-macrophage persistence are key strategies for achieving durable responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","volume":"616 ","pages":"Article 112263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical model suggests current CAR-macrophage dosage is efficient to low pre-infusion tumour burden but refractory to high tumour burden\",\"authors\":\"Shilian Xu , Maoxuan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtbi.2025.112263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-macrophage therapy is a promising approach for tumour treatment due to antigen-specific phagocytosis and tumour clearance. However, the precise impact of tumour burden, dose and dosing regimens on therapeutic outcomes remains poorly understood. We developed ordinary differential equation (ODE) mathematical modelling and utilised parameter inference to analyse <em>in vitro</em> FACS-based phagocytosis assay data testing CD19-positive Raji tumour cell against CAR-macrophage, and revealed that phagocytosing efficiency of CAR-macrophage increases but saturates as both Raji cell and CAR-macrophage concentrations increase. This interaction resulted in bistable Raji cell kinetics; specifically, within a particular range of CAR-macrophage concentration, low tumour burdens are effectively inhibited, while high tumour burdens remain refractory. Furthermore, our model predicted that CAR-macrophage dosages typically suggested by current clinical trials yield favourable therapeutic outcomes only when tumour burden is low. For split CAR-macrophage infusion with fixed total dosage, the first infusion with high CAR-macrophage dose delivers superior treatment outcomes. Finally, we identified alternative infusion regimens: five billion cells administered monthly for three months, or seven billion cells every two months for six months, can efficiently suppress Raji cell replication irrespective of tumour burden. Our findings highlight CAR-macrophage therapeutic outcomes are strongly influenced by both tumour burden and different dosing regimens. This work underscores that reducing tumour burden, increasing CAR-macrophage dose in the first infusion and prolonging CAR-macrophage persistence are key strategies for achieving durable responses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theoretical Biology\",\"volume\":\"616 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theoretical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519325002292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519325002292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mathematical model suggests current CAR-macrophage dosage is efficient to low pre-infusion tumour burden but refractory to high tumour burden
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-macrophage therapy is a promising approach for tumour treatment due to antigen-specific phagocytosis and tumour clearance. However, the precise impact of tumour burden, dose and dosing regimens on therapeutic outcomes remains poorly understood. We developed ordinary differential equation (ODE) mathematical modelling and utilised parameter inference to analyse in vitro FACS-based phagocytosis assay data testing CD19-positive Raji tumour cell against CAR-macrophage, and revealed that phagocytosing efficiency of CAR-macrophage increases but saturates as both Raji cell and CAR-macrophage concentrations increase. This interaction resulted in bistable Raji cell kinetics; specifically, within a particular range of CAR-macrophage concentration, low tumour burdens are effectively inhibited, while high tumour burdens remain refractory. Furthermore, our model predicted that CAR-macrophage dosages typically suggested by current clinical trials yield favourable therapeutic outcomes only when tumour burden is low. For split CAR-macrophage infusion with fixed total dosage, the first infusion with high CAR-macrophage dose delivers superior treatment outcomes. Finally, we identified alternative infusion regimens: five billion cells administered monthly for three months, or seven billion cells every two months for six months, can efficiently suppress Raji cell replication irrespective of tumour burden. Our findings highlight CAR-macrophage therapeutic outcomes are strongly influenced by both tumour burden and different dosing regimens. This work underscores that reducing tumour burden, increasing CAR-macrophage dose in the first infusion and prolonging CAR-macrophage persistence are key strategies for achieving durable responses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Theoretical Biology is the leading forum for theoretical perspectives that give insight into biological processes. It covers a very wide range of topics and is of interest to biologists in many areas of research, including:
• Brain and Neuroscience
• Cancer Growth and Treatment
• Cell Biology
• Developmental Biology
• Ecology
• Evolution
• Immunology,
• Infectious and non-infectious Diseases,
• Mathematical, Computational, Biophysical and Statistical Modeling
• Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry
• Networks and Complex Systems
• Physiology
• Pharmacodynamics
• Animal Behavior and Game Theory
Acceptable papers are those that bear significant importance on the biology per se being presented, and not on the mathematical analysis. Papers that include some data or experimental material bearing on theory will be considered, including those that contain comparative study, statistical data analysis, mathematical proof, computer simulations, experiments, field observations, or even philosophical arguments, which are all methods to support or reject theoretical ideas. However, there should be a concerted effort to make papers intelligible to biologists in the chosen field.