何时改用皮下注射英夫利昔单抗?RE-WATCH多中心研究。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Lorenzo Bertani, Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone, Fabrizio Bossa, Maria Guerra, Monica Annese, Raffaele Manta, Angelo Armandi, Gian Paolo Caviglia, Alessia Todeschini, Angela Variola
{"title":"何时改用皮下注射英夫利昔单抗?RE-WATCH多中心研究。","authors":"Lorenzo Bertani, Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone, Fabrizio Bossa, Maria Guerra, Monica Annese, Raffaele Manta, Angelo Armandi, Gian Paolo Caviglia, Alessia Todeschini, Angela Variola","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izaf172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The infliximab (IFX) biosimilar, CT-P13, is available as an intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) formulation. Although current indications allow the transition from IV CT-P13 to SC CT-P13 after two IV administrations, some clinicians prefer to postpone switching until stable clinical remission has been achieved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluate the endoscopic response, treatment persistence, clinical remission, endoscopic remission, and safety profile after one year of treatment with IFX in patients switched from IV to SC after 6 weeks (early switch group) or after 6 months (late switch group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistical differences between the two groups after one year in terms of endoscopic response (71.4% vs 70.8%, P = .95), steroid-free clinical remission (62.5% vs 68.7%, P = .51), or IFX retention rate (75.0% vs 66.7%, P = .35). We observed higher endoscopic remission rates in early switch patients as compared to late switch patients; however, this trend was not significant (69.6% vs 52.1%, P = .07). A return to IV-IFX was required in 1 of 43 early switch patients and in 3 of 44 late switch patients (2.3% vs 6.8%, P = .31). Clinical indexes, fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels significantly decreased after one year regardless of group. Adverse events were also comparable between groups (4.5% vs 8.3%, P = .46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study has shown that early switch from IV-IFX to SC-IFX at 6 weeks is effective in terms of clinical and endoscopic remission at one year yielding similar results to late switch at 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When to Switch to Subcutaneous Infliximab? The RE-WATCH Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Bertani, Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone, Fabrizio Bossa, Maria Guerra, Monica Annese, Raffaele Manta, Angelo Armandi, Gian Paolo Caviglia, Alessia Todeschini, Angela Variola\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ibd/izaf172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The infliximab (IFX) biosimilar, CT-P13, is available as an intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) formulation. Although current indications allow the transition from IV CT-P13 to SC CT-P13 after two IV administrations, some clinicians prefer to postpone switching until stable clinical remission has been achieved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluate the endoscopic response, treatment persistence, clinical remission, endoscopic remission, and safety profile after one year of treatment with IFX in patients switched from IV to SC after 6 weeks (early switch group) or after 6 months (late switch group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistical differences between the two groups after one year in terms of endoscopic response (71.4% vs 70.8%, P = .95), steroid-free clinical remission (62.5% vs 68.7%, P = .51), or IFX retention rate (75.0% vs 66.7%, P = .35). We observed higher endoscopic remission rates in early switch patients as compared to late switch patients; however, this trend was not significant (69.6% vs 52.1%, P = .07). A return to IV-IFX was required in 1 of 43 early switch patients and in 3 of 44 late switch patients (2.3% vs 6.8%, P = .31). Clinical indexes, fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels significantly decreased after one year regardless of group. Adverse events were also comparable between groups (4.5% vs 8.3%, P = .46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study has shown that early switch from IV-IFX to SC-IFX at 6 weeks is effective in terms of clinical and endoscopic remission at one year yielding similar results to late switch at 6 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英夫利昔单抗(IFX)生物类似药CT-P13可作为静脉注射(IV)和皮下注射(SC)制剂。虽然目前的适应症允许在两次静脉注射后从IV CT-P13过渡到SC CT-P13,但一些临床医生倾向于推迟转换,直到达到稳定的临床缓解。方法:我们评估在静脉注射6周后(早期切换组)或6个月后(晚期切换组)从静脉注射切换到SC的患者在使用IFX治疗一年后的内镜下反应、治疗持久性、临床缓解、内镜下缓解和安全性。结果:两组患者1年后内镜下缓解率(71.4% vs 70.8%, P = 0.95)、无类固醇临床缓解率(62.5% vs 68.7%, P = 0.95)无统计学差异。51),或IFX留存率(75.0% vs 66.7%, P = 0.35)。我们观察到早期转换患者的内镜下缓解率高于晚期转换患者;然而,这一趋势并不显著(69.6% vs 52.1%, P = .07)。43例早期转换患者中有1例需要返回IV-IFX, 44例晚期转换患者中有3例需要返回IV-IFX (2.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.31)。临床指标显示,两组1年后粪便钙保护蛋白、c反应蛋白(CRP)水平均显著下降。两组间不良事件也具有可比性(4.5% vs 8.3%, P = 0.46)。结论:我们的研究表明,在临床和内镜缓解方面,早期从IV-IFX切换到SC-IFX在6周内是有效的,在一年内产生相似的结果在6个月后切换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When to Switch to Subcutaneous Infliximab? The RE-WATCH Multicenter Study.

Background: The infliximab (IFX) biosimilar, CT-P13, is available as an intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) formulation. Although current indications allow the transition from IV CT-P13 to SC CT-P13 after two IV administrations, some clinicians prefer to postpone switching until stable clinical remission has been achieved.

Methods: We evaluate the endoscopic response, treatment persistence, clinical remission, endoscopic remission, and safety profile after one year of treatment with IFX in patients switched from IV to SC after 6 weeks (early switch group) or after 6 months (late switch group).

Results: There were no statistical differences between the two groups after one year in terms of endoscopic response (71.4% vs 70.8%, P = .95), steroid-free clinical remission (62.5% vs 68.7%, P = .51), or IFX retention rate (75.0% vs 66.7%, P = .35). We observed higher endoscopic remission rates in early switch patients as compared to late switch patients; however, this trend was not significant (69.6% vs 52.1%, P = .07). A return to IV-IFX was required in 1 of 43 early switch patients and in 3 of 44 late switch patients (2.3% vs 6.8%, P = .31). Clinical indexes, fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels significantly decreased after one year regardless of group. Adverse events were also comparable between groups (4.5% vs 8.3%, P = .46).

Conclusions: Our study has shown that early switch from IV-IFX to SC-IFX at 6 weeks is effective in terms of clinical and endoscopic remission at one year yielding similar results to late switch at 6 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信