闭合循环:报告偶发影像学发现的基于电子病历协议的9年结果

Rohan M Shah, Aniket Dehadrai, Ariz Keshwani, Brenda Schmitz, James C Carr
{"title":"闭合循环:报告偶发影像学发现的基于电子病历协议的9年结果","authors":"Rohan M Shah, Aniket Dehadrai, Ariz Keshwani, Brenda Schmitz, James C Carr","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Incidental findings in radiology are common, especially with rising imaging volumes. Early disease recognition can greatly improve clinical outcomes, but in low-risk cases, incidental findings often lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment, causing harm. Robust systems are critical to promote early identification without overburdening patients or healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of incidental findings reported through a novel electronic notification system from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. Adults undergoing CT, MRI, radiographs, or ultrasound were included. The protocol involved radiologists submitting findings via an EMR button, triggering a nursing-led follow-up algorithm that varied based on clinical setting (ED, inpatient, outpatient) and finding type (e.g., lung, kidney). Primary outcomes were utilization (total cases, compounded growth) and case resolution. Secondary outcomes included stratification by imaging modality and type of incidental finding. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 25,175 incidental findings were reported, averaging 2,797 cases per year and 233 per month, with an overall compounded annual growth rate of 21.44%. Resolution rates remained consistently >99% after initial tracking began, with only two months below this threshold. From 2019-2023, among 17,205 available cases, lung findings were the most common (19.31%), followed by brain (7.29%) and kidney (7.17%). CT imaging was the most frequent modality (53.99%), followed by MRI (20.34%), radiographs (18.17%), and ultrasound (7.49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We successfully implemented an incidental findings reporting protocol with strong provider uptake and case resolution. As imaging volumes continue to rise, structured follow-up systems are increasingly critical for hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closing the loop: nine-year outcomes of an electronic medical record-based protocol for reporting incidental imaging findings.\",\"authors\":\"Rohan M Shah, Aniket Dehadrai, Ariz Keshwani, Brenda Schmitz, James C Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Incidental findings in radiology are common, especially with rising imaging volumes. Early disease recognition can greatly improve clinical outcomes, but in low-risk cases, incidental findings often lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment, causing harm. Robust systems are critical to promote early identification without overburdening patients or healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of incidental findings reported through a novel electronic notification system from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. Adults undergoing CT, MRI, radiographs, or ultrasound were included. The protocol involved radiologists submitting findings via an EMR button, triggering a nursing-led follow-up algorithm that varied based on clinical setting (ED, inpatient, outpatient) and finding type (e.g., lung, kidney). Primary outcomes were utilization (total cases, compounded growth) and case resolution. Secondary outcomes included stratification by imaging modality and type of incidental finding. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 25,175 incidental findings were reported, averaging 2,797 cases per year and 233 per month, with an overall compounded annual growth rate of 21.44%. Resolution rates remained consistently >99% after initial tracking began, with only two months below this threshold. From 2019-2023, among 17,205 available cases, lung findings were the most common (19.31%), followed by brain (7.29%) and kidney (7.17%). CT imaging was the most frequent modality (53.99%), followed by MRI (20.34%), radiographs (18.17%), and ultrasound (7.49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We successfully implemented an incidental findings reporting protocol with strong provider uptake and case resolution. As imaging volumes continue to rise, structured follow-up systems are increasingly critical for hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.08.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:放射学中的意外发现是常见的,特别是随着成像体积的增加。疾病的早期识别可以极大地改善临床结果,但在低风险病例中,偶然发现往往导致过度诊断和过度治疗,造成伤害。健全的系统对于促进早期识别而不使患者或卫生保健系统负担过重至关重要。方法:对2015年1月1日至2023年12月31日通过新型电子通报系统报告的意外发现进行回顾性分析。接受CT、MRI、x线摄影或超声检查的成年人也包括在内。该方案涉及放射科医生通过电子病历按钮提交检查结果,触发护理主导的随访算法,该算法根据临床环境(急诊科、住院、门诊)和发现类型(如肺、肾)而变化。主要结果是使用率(总病例数,复合增长率)和病例解决率。次要结果包括影像学方式分层和偶然发现类型。采用描述性统计进行分析。结果:共报告意外发现25175例,平均每年2797例,每月233例,年复合增长率为21.44%。在最初的跟踪开始后,分辨率一直保持在99%左右,只有两个月低于这个阈值。2019-2023年,在17205例可用病例中,肺部最常见(19.31%),其次是脑部(7.29%)和肾脏(7.17%)。CT影像学检查最多(53.99%),其次为MRI(20.34%)、x线片(18.17%)和超声(7.49%)。结论:我们成功地实施了意外发现报告协议,具有强大的提供者吸收和病例解决方案。随着影像量的不断增加,结构化的随访系统对医院来说越来越重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Closing the loop: nine-year outcomes of an electronic medical record-based protocol for reporting incidental imaging findings.

Introduction: Incidental findings in radiology are common, especially with rising imaging volumes. Early disease recognition can greatly improve clinical outcomes, but in low-risk cases, incidental findings often lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment, causing harm. Robust systems are critical to promote early identification without overburdening patients or healthcare systems.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of incidental findings reported through a novel electronic notification system from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. Adults undergoing CT, MRI, radiographs, or ultrasound were included. The protocol involved radiologists submitting findings via an EMR button, triggering a nursing-led follow-up algorithm that varied based on clinical setting (ED, inpatient, outpatient) and finding type (e.g., lung, kidney). Primary outcomes were utilization (total cases, compounded growth) and case resolution. Secondary outcomes included stratification by imaging modality and type of incidental finding. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results: A total 25,175 incidental findings were reported, averaging 2,797 cases per year and 233 per month, with an overall compounded annual growth rate of 21.44%. Resolution rates remained consistently >99% after initial tracking began, with only two months below this threshold. From 2019-2023, among 17,205 available cases, lung findings were the most common (19.31%), followed by brain (7.29%) and kidney (7.17%). CT imaging was the most frequent modality (53.99%), followed by MRI (20.34%), radiographs (18.17%), and ultrasound (7.49%).

Conclusions: We successfully implemented an incidental findings reporting protocol with strong provider uptake and case resolution. As imaging volumes continue to rise, structured follow-up systems are increasingly critical for hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信