在碎片。

Q3 Psychology
Jô Gondar
{"title":"在碎片。","authors":"Jô Gondar","doi":"10.1057/s11231-025-09518-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are two ways to conceive of fragments in Ferenczi's work. They may result from a shock, or they may be related to an original multiplicity from which subjectivity itself derives. In this paper I take into consideration the two perspectives of fragments in Ferenczian texts, focusing more on one of them-the fragment as irreducible to a unity. It is a contemporary issue, since subjectivities, and their affective, aesthetic and political relations work predominantly in fragmentary mode today. So we are, as psychoanalysts, summoned to respond to a fundamental ethical problem: are we going to take a nostalgic attitude, regretting that fragmented forms have prevailed over more systematic and identitarian ones, or are we going to refine our sensibilities and our perceptions to apprehend what is new, worthy and creative in these subjective and aesthetic forms? Once more, Ferenczi can help us to deal with new phenomena in clinical work.</p>","PeriodicalId":52458,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychoanalysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In pieces.\",\"authors\":\"Jô Gondar\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s11231-025-09518-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are two ways to conceive of fragments in Ferenczi's work. They may result from a shock, or they may be related to an original multiplicity from which subjectivity itself derives. In this paper I take into consideration the two perspectives of fragments in Ferenczian texts, focusing more on one of them-the fragment as irreducible to a unity. It is a contemporary issue, since subjectivities, and their affective, aesthetic and political relations work predominantly in fragmentary mode today. So we are, as psychoanalysts, summoned to respond to a fundamental ethical problem: are we going to take a nostalgic attitude, regretting that fragmented forms have prevailed over more systematic and identitarian ones, or are we going to refine our sensibilities and our perceptions to apprehend what is new, worthy and creative in these subjective and aesthetic forms? Once more, Ferenczi can help us to deal with new phenomena in clinical work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-025-09518-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-025-09518-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有两种方式来理解费伦齐作品中的片段。它们可能源于一种冲击,也可能与主体性本身所产生的原始多样性有关。在本文中,我考虑了两个角度的片段在费伦兹文本中,更侧重于其中一个-片段作为一个不可约的统一。这是一个当代问题,因为主体性及其情感、审美和政治关系在今天主要以碎片模式起作用。因此,作为精神分析学家,我们被召唤去回应一个基本的伦理问题:我们是要采取一种怀旧的态度,遗憾碎片化的形式已经压倒了更加系统化和同一性的形式,还是要完善我们的情感和感知,以理解在这些主观和审美形式中,什么是新的、有价值的和有创造性的?再次,Ferenczi可以帮助我们处理临床工作中的新现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In pieces.

There are two ways to conceive of fragments in Ferenczi's work. They may result from a shock, or they may be related to an original multiplicity from which subjectivity itself derives. In this paper I take into consideration the two perspectives of fragments in Ferenczian texts, focusing more on one of them-the fragment as irreducible to a unity. It is a contemporary issue, since subjectivities, and their affective, aesthetic and political relations work predominantly in fragmentary mode today. So we are, as psychoanalysts, summoned to respond to a fundamental ethical problem: are we going to take a nostalgic attitude, regretting that fragmented forms have prevailed over more systematic and identitarian ones, or are we going to refine our sensibilities and our perceptions to apprehend what is new, worthy and creative in these subjective and aesthetic forms? Once more, Ferenczi can help us to deal with new phenomena in clinical work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychoanalysis
American Journal of Psychoanalysis Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychoanalysis is an international psychoanalytic quarterly founded in 1941 by Karen Horney. The journal''s purpose is to be an international forum for communicating a broad range of contemporary theoretical, clinical, professional and cultural concepts of psychoanalysis and for presenting related investigations in allied fields. It is a fully peer-reviewed journal, which welcomes psychoanalytic papers from all schools of thought that address the interests and concerns of scholars and practitioners of psychoanalysis and contribute meaningfully to the understanding of human experience. The journal publishes original papers, special issues devoted to a single topic, book reviews, film reviews, reports on the activities of the Karen Horney Psychoanalytic Center, and comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信