{"title":"在碎片。","authors":"Jô Gondar","doi":"10.1057/s11231-025-09518-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are two ways to conceive of fragments in Ferenczi's work. They may result from a shock, or they may be related to an original multiplicity from which subjectivity itself derives. In this paper I take into consideration the two perspectives of fragments in Ferenczian texts, focusing more on one of them-the fragment as irreducible to a unity. It is a contemporary issue, since subjectivities, and their affective, aesthetic and political relations work predominantly in fragmentary mode today. So we are, as psychoanalysts, summoned to respond to a fundamental ethical problem: are we going to take a nostalgic attitude, regretting that fragmented forms have prevailed over more systematic and identitarian ones, or are we going to refine our sensibilities and our perceptions to apprehend what is new, worthy and creative in these subjective and aesthetic forms? Once more, Ferenczi can help us to deal with new phenomena in clinical work.</p>","PeriodicalId":52458,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychoanalysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In pieces.\",\"authors\":\"Jô Gondar\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s11231-025-09518-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are two ways to conceive of fragments in Ferenczi's work. They may result from a shock, or they may be related to an original multiplicity from which subjectivity itself derives. In this paper I take into consideration the two perspectives of fragments in Ferenczian texts, focusing more on one of them-the fragment as irreducible to a unity. It is a contemporary issue, since subjectivities, and their affective, aesthetic and political relations work predominantly in fragmentary mode today. So we are, as psychoanalysts, summoned to respond to a fundamental ethical problem: are we going to take a nostalgic attitude, regretting that fragmented forms have prevailed over more systematic and identitarian ones, or are we going to refine our sensibilities and our perceptions to apprehend what is new, worthy and creative in these subjective and aesthetic forms? Once more, Ferenczi can help us to deal with new phenomena in clinical work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-025-09518-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-025-09518-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
There are two ways to conceive of fragments in Ferenczi's work. They may result from a shock, or they may be related to an original multiplicity from which subjectivity itself derives. In this paper I take into consideration the two perspectives of fragments in Ferenczian texts, focusing more on one of them-the fragment as irreducible to a unity. It is a contemporary issue, since subjectivities, and their affective, aesthetic and political relations work predominantly in fragmentary mode today. So we are, as psychoanalysts, summoned to respond to a fundamental ethical problem: are we going to take a nostalgic attitude, regretting that fragmented forms have prevailed over more systematic and identitarian ones, or are we going to refine our sensibilities and our perceptions to apprehend what is new, worthy and creative in these subjective and aesthetic forms? Once more, Ferenczi can help us to deal with new phenomena in clinical work.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis is an international psychoanalytic quarterly founded in 1941 by Karen Horney. The journal''s purpose is to be an international forum for communicating a broad range of contemporary theoretical, clinical, professional and cultural concepts of psychoanalysis and for presenting related investigations in allied fields. It is a fully peer-reviewed journal, which welcomes psychoanalytic papers from all schools of thought that address the interests and concerns of scholars and practitioners of psychoanalysis and contribute meaningfully to the understanding of human experience. The journal publishes original papers, special issues devoted to a single topic, book reviews, film reviews, reports on the activities of the Karen Horney Psychoanalytic Center, and comments.