在多站点农村卫生系统中实施虚拟重症监护模式后药物治疗方案复杂性- icu (MRC-ICU)评分变化的评估

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
David Mastro, Karen Williams, Joshua Campbell
{"title":"在多站点农村卫生系统中实施虚拟重症监护模式后药物治疗方案复杂性- icu (MRC-ICU)评分变化的评估","authors":"David Mastro, Karen Williams, Joshua Campbell","doi":"10.1177/08971900251370888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telehealth in the ICU (Tele-ICU) may improve patient outcomes and optimize utilization of high acuity intensive care unit (ICU) beds. However, the relationship between tele-ICU and medication regimen complexity-ICU (MRC-ICU) score is unexplored. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the effect of tele-ICU on MRC-ICU score and describe pharmacists' work. <b>Methods:</b> Adult ICU encounters lasting at least 24 h were retrospectively compared pre- and post- implementation of tele-ICU services in a rural, five-hospital system. The primary outcome was MRC-ICU score 24 h after ICU admission. Prospectively, pharmacist interventions during ICU encounters were captured. Encounters were categorized on exposure to clinical pharmacist review. <b>Results:</b> The difference in mean MRC-ICU score between pre- and post-intervention encounters was -0.2032 (95% CI,-0.8253, 0.4188, <i>P</i> = 0.5217). Post-intervention encounters had a higher rate of thromboembolism prophylaxis (64.5% vs 54.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.001), higher adherence to stress-ulcer prophylaxis (74.1% vs 60.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and a lower presence of glycemic control agent(s) (39.8% vs 46.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.017) 24 h after ICU admission. Tele-ICU services did not significantly change ICU LOS (3.261 vs 3.166 days, <i>P</i> = 0.536), nor ICU mortality (11.1% vs 12.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.377). In the prospective period (n = 196 encounters), 189 interventions were recorded on 80 encounters. There was no difference in median MRC-ICU score at 24 h in encounters with clinical pharmacist review and intervention vs without scheduled clinical pharmacist review (9 vs 8, <i>P</i> = 0.0596). <b>Conclusion:</b> Implementation of Tele-ICU did not change the MRC-ICU score at 24 h, although some ICU bundled care metrics improved. Many encounters lack opportunity for meaningful pharmacy interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900251370888"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Change in Medication Regimen Complexity-ICU (MRC-ICU) Score Following Implementation of a Virtual Intensive Care Model in a Multisite, Rural Health-System.\",\"authors\":\"David Mastro, Karen Williams, Joshua Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08971900251370888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telehealth in the ICU (Tele-ICU) may improve patient outcomes and optimize utilization of high acuity intensive care unit (ICU) beds. However, the relationship between tele-ICU and medication regimen complexity-ICU (MRC-ICU) score is unexplored. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the effect of tele-ICU on MRC-ICU score and describe pharmacists' work. <b>Methods:</b> Adult ICU encounters lasting at least 24 h were retrospectively compared pre- and post- implementation of tele-ICU services in a rural, five-hospital system. The primary outcome was MRC-ICU score 24 h after ICU admission. Prospectively, pharmacist interventions during ICU encounters were captured. Encounters were categorized on exposure to clinical pharmacist review. <b>Results:</b> The difference in mean MRC-ICU score between pre- and post-intervention encounters was -0.2032 (95% CI,-0.8253, 0.4188, <i>P</i> = 0.5217). Post-intervention encounters had a higher rate of thromboembolism prophylaxis (64.5% vs 54.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.001), higher adherence to stress-ulcer prophylaxis (74.1% vs 60.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and a lower presence of glycemic control agent(s) (39.8% vs 46.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.017) 24 h after ICU admission. Tele-ICU services did not significantly change ICU LOS (3.261 vs 3.166 days, <i>P</i> = 0.536), nor ICU mortality (11.1% vs 12.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.377). In the prospective period (n = 196 encounters), 189 interventions were recorded on 80 encounters. There was no difference in median MRC-ICU score at 24 h in encounters with clinical pharmacist review and intervention vs without scheduled clinical pharmacist review (9 vs 8, <i>P</i> = 0.0596). <b>Conclusion:</b> Implementation of Tele-ICU did not change the MRC-ICU score at 24 h, although some ICU bundled care metrics improved. Many encounters lack opportunity for meaningful pharmacy interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8971900251370888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251370888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251370888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程医疗在ICU(远程ICU)可以改善病人的结果和优化高急性重症监护病房(ICU)床位的利用。然而,远程icu与用药方案复杂性- icu (MRC-ICU)评分之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:评价远程icu对MRC-ICU评分的影响,描述药师的工作。方法:回顾性比较农村五医院系统远程ICU服务实施前后持续至少24小时的成人ICU就诊情况。主要观察指标为入院24 h后MRC-ICU评分。前瞻性地,在ICU遇到药剂师干预被捕获。根据接触临床药师的情况进行分类。结果:干预前与干预后MRC-ICU平均评分差异为-0.2032 (95% CI,-0.8253, 0.4188, P = 0.5217)。干预后就诊有较高的血栓栓塞预防率(64.5% vs 54.9%, P = 0.001),较高的应激性溃疡预防依从性(74.1% vs 60.9%, P < 0.001),以及较低的血糖控制药物(39.8% vs 46.2%, P = 0.017)。远程ICU服务对ICU LOS(3.261天vs 3.166天,P = 0.536)和ICU死亡率(11.1% vs 12.7%, P = 0.377)无显著影响。在预期期间(n = 196次就诊),在80次就诊中记录了189项干预措施。有临床药师复查和干预的患者与未安排临床药师复查的患者在24 h时MRC-ICU评分中位数无差异(9比8,P = 0.0596)。结论:远程ICU的实施并没有改变24小时MRC-ICU评分,尽管一些ICU捆绑护理指标有所改善。许多遭遇缺乏进行有意义的药学干预的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Change in Medication Regimen Complexity-ICU (MRC-ICU) Score Following Implementation of a Virtual Intensive Care Model in a Multisite, Rural Health-System.

Background: Telehealth in the ICU (Tele-ICU) may improve patient outcomes and optimize utilization of high acuity intensive care unit (ICU) beds. However, the relationship between tele-ICU and medication regimen complexity-ICU (MRC-ICU) score is unexplored. Objective: To assess the effect of tele-ICU on MRC-ICU score and describe pharmacists' work. Methods: Adult ICU encounters lasting at least 24 h were retrospectively compared pre- and post- implementation of tele-ICU services in a rural, five-hospital system. The primary outcome was MRC-ICU score 24 h after ICU admission. Prospectively, pharmacist interventions during ICU encounters were captured. Encounters were categorized on exposure to clinical pharmacist review. Results: The difference in mean MRC-ICU score between pre- and post-intervention encounters was -0.2032 (95% CI,-0.8253, 0.4188, P = 0.5217). Post-intervention encounters had a higher rate of thromboembolism prophylaxis (64.5% vs 54.9%, P = 0.001), higher adherence to stress-ulcer prophylaxis (74.1% vs 60.9%, P < 0.001), and a lower presence of glycemic control agent(s) (39.8% vs 46.2%, P = 0.017) 24 h after ICU admission. Tele-ICU services did not significantly change ICU LOS (3.261 vs 3.166 days, P = 0.536), nor ICU mortality (11.1% vs 12.7%, P = 0.377). In the prospective period (n = 196 encounters), 189 interventions were recorded on 80 encounters. There was no difference in median MRC-ICU score at 24 h in encounters with clinical pharmacist review and intervention vs without scheduled clinical pharmacist review (9 vs 8, P = 0.0596). Conclusion: Implementation of Tele-ICU did not change the MRC-ICU score at 24 h, although some ICU bundled care metrics improved. Many encounters lack opportunity for meaningful pharmacy interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信