{"title":"行政负担是社区精神卫生中心和联邦合格健康中心获得精神卫生服务的明显障碍:混合方法评估。","authors":"Danielle R Adams","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01506-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasingly, adolescents are struggling with poor mental health outcomes, making it essential to improve access to high-quality mental health services. Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) act as key \"safety-net\" health centers for low-income youth seeking mental health services, as the majority accept Medicaid. This study examines how administrative burdens, i.e., challenges citizens face when interacting with a government agency, may act as barriers to accessing mental health services, especially for adolescents and their caregivers. This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study uses data from semi-structured interviews with hospital- and community-based social workers, and from a mystery shopper study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic with CMHCs and FQHCs in a large metropolitan county in the United States. It addresses three questions: (1) what kinds of administrative burdens exist in accessing mental health care for adolescents and their families at FQHCs and CMHCs? (2) how do these burdens convey potential learning, compliance, and psychological costs to prospective clients? (3) how do these burdens act as distinct barriers to accessing mental health services for adolescents and their families within safety-net health centers? Moreso than CMHCs, FQHCs implemented a variety of administrative burdens on prospective clients, such as a requirement to designate their primary care physician into the FQHCs network through their insurance prior to scheduling, difficult-to-navigate phone trees, unanswered voicemails, rude or discriminatory interactions with schedulers, and complex referral processes. This study finds that administrative burdens may act as distinct barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Recommendations to reduce administrative burdens at the organizational- and system-levels are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administrative Burdens as Distinct Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Services in Community Mental Health Centers and Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mixed-Methods Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle R Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10597-025-01506-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increasingly, adolescents are struggling with poor mental health outcomes, making it essential to improve access to high-quality mental health services. Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) act as key \\\"safety-net\\\" health centers for low-income youth seeking mental health services, as the majority accept Medicaid. This study examines how administrative burdens, i.e., challenges citizens face when interacting with a government agency, may act as barriers to accessing mental health services, especially for adolescents and their caregivers. This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study uses data from semi-structured interviews with hospital- and community-based social workers, and from a mystery shopper study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic with CMHCs and FQHCs in a large metropolitan county in the United States. It addresses three questions: (1) what kinds of administrative burdens exist in accessing mental health care for adolescents and their families at FQHCs and CMHCs? (2) how do these burdens convey potential learning, compliance, and psychological costs to prospective clients? (3) how do these burdens act as distinct barriers to accessing mental health services for adolescents and their families within safety-net health centers? Moreso than CMHCs, FQHCs implemented a variety of administrative burdens on prospective clients, such as a requirement to designate their primary care physician into the FQHCs network through their insurance prior to scheduling, difficult-to-navigate phone trees, unanswered voicemails, rude or discriminatory interactions with schedulers, and complex referral processes. This study finds that administrative burdens may act as distinct barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Recommendations to reduce administrative burdens at the organizational- and system-levels are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01506-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01506-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Administrative Burdens as Distinct Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Services in Community Mental Health Centers and Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mixed-Methods Assessment.
Increasingly, adolescents are struggling with poor mental health outcomes, making it essential to improve access to high-quality mental health services. Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) act as key "safety-net" health centers for low-income youth seeking mental health services, as the majority accept Medicaid. This study examines how administrative burdens, i.e., challenges citizens face when interacting with a government agency, may act as barriers to accessing mental health services, especially for adolescents and their caregivers. This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study uses data from semi-structured interviews with hospital- and community-based social workers, and from a mystery shopper study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic with CMHCs and FQHCs in a large metropolitan county in the United States. It addresses three questions: (1) what kinds of administrative burdens exist in accessing mental health care for adolescents and their families at FQHCs and CMHCs? (2) how do these burdens convey potential learning, compliance, and psychological costs to prospective clients? (3) how do these burdens act as distinct barriers to accessing mental health services for adolescents and their families within safety-net health centers? Moreso than CMHCs, FQHCs implemented a variety of administrative burdens on prospective clients, such as a requirement to designate their primary care physician into the FQHCs network through their insurance prior to scheduling, difficult-to-navigate phone trees, unanswered voicemails, rude or discriminatory interactions with schedulers, and complex referral processes. This study finds that administrative burdens may act as distinct barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Recommendations to reduce administrative burdens at the organizational- and system-levels are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.