在非肿瘤性乳房手术中使用抗生素预防手术部位感染:范围综述。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Erin N Abbott, Brittany G Lively, Andrew J James, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, Benjamin L Savitz, Anvith P Reddy, Ronald M Cornely, Barite Gutama, Galen Perdikis, William C Lineaweaver
{"title":"在非肿瘤性乳房手术中使用抗生素预防手术部位感染:范围综述。","authors":"Erin N Abbott, Brittany G Lively, Andrew J James, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, Benjamin L Savitz, Anvith P Reddy, Ronald M Cornely, Barite Gutama, Galen Perdikis, William C Lineaweaver","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The practice of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in breast surgery remains debated. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature evaluating the current evidence on the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in nononcologic breast surgery, including risk-reducing mastectomy, gender-affirming mastectomy, augmentation, and reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of PubMed and Cochrane databases of 1990-2025 was conducted to identify studies evaluating antibiotic prophylaxis and SSI outcomes in nononcologic breast surgery. Included studies were screened and analyzed by procedure type, study design, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The impact of antibiotic prophylaxis varied by procedure type. For risk-reducing mastectomy, the results were mixed. Multiple clinical trials indicated no significant reduction in SSI with antibiotic prophylaxis, while one meta-analysis and one cohort study suggested that antibiotics may decrease the risk of SSI. Additionally, one randomized controlled trial in overweight or obese patients indicated that antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased SSI in risk reducing mastectomy. In gender-affirming mastectomy, infection rates were low (approximately 3%-5%), and evidence supports single-dose preoperative prophylaxis. For breast reduction, multiple systematic reviews and clinical trials indicated a significant reduction in SSI with prophylactic treatment. Two randomized controlled trials indicated that extending antibiotic prophylaxis into the postoperative period had no significant impact on SSI. For breast augmentation, systematic reviews and clinical studies found no significant reduction in SSI with prophylactic antibiotic treatment. While one systematic review suggested SSI reduction in implant-based reconstruction, this was not observed in breast augmentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of antibiotic prophylaxis within nononcologic breast surgery remains poorly defined, with reported effectiveness varying depending on the type of surgery, duration of treatment, and risk factors of the patient. Further high-quality clinical trials are warranted to fully evaluate the role of prophylactic antibiotic use in nononcologic breast surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"95 3S Suppl 1","pages":"S6-S10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Nononcologic Breast Surgery: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Erin N Abbott, Brittany G Lively, Andrew J James, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, Benjamin L Savitz, Anvith P Reddy, Ronald M Cornely, Barite Gutama, Galen Perdikis, William C Lineaweaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The practice of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in breast surgery remains debated. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature evaluating the current evidence on the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in nononcologic breast surgery, including risk-reducing mastectomy, gender-affirming mastectomy, augmentation, and reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of PubMed and Cochrane databases of 1990-2025 was conducted to identify studies evaluating antibiotic prophylaxis and SSI outcomes in nononcologic breast surgery. Included studies were screened and analyzed by procedure type, study design, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The impact of antibiotic prophylaxis varied by procedure type. For risk-reducing mastectomy, the results were mixed. Multiple clinical trials indicated no significant reduction in SSI with antibiotic prophylaxis, while one meta-analysis and one cohort study suggested that antibiotics may decrease the risk of SSI. Additionally, one randomized controlled trial in overweight or obese patients indicated that antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased SSI in risk reducing mastectomy. In gender-affirming mastectomy, infection rates were low (approximately 3%-5%), and evidence supports single-dose preoperative prophylaxis. For breast reduction, multiple systematic reviews and clinical trials indicated a significant reduction in SSI with prophylactic treatment. Two randomized controlled trials indicated that extending antibiotic prophylaxis into the postoperative period had no significant impact on SSI. For breast augmentation, systematic reviews and clinical studies found no significant reduction in SSI with prophylactic antibiotic treatment. While one systematic review suggested SSI reduction in implant-based reconstruction, this was not observed in breast augmentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of antibiotic prophylaxis within nononcologic breast surgery remains poorly defined, with reported effectiveness varying depending on the type of surgery, duration of treatment, and risk factors of the patient. Further high-quality clinical trials are warranted to fully evaluate the role of prophylactic antibiotic use in nononcologic breast surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"95 3S Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S6-S10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004474\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳房手术中系统性抗生素预防手术部位感染(SSI)的实践仍存在争议。本综述的目的是提供一个全面的文献综述,评估非肿瘤性乳房手术中抗生素预防疗效的现有证据,包括降低风险的乳房切除术,性别确认乳房切除术,隆胸和缩小。方法:对PubMed和Cochrane数据库1990-2025年的文献进行检索,以确定评估非肿瘤性乳房手术中抗生素预防和SSI结果的研究。纳入的研究按程序类型、研究设计和结果进行筛选和分析。结果:抗生素预防的影响因手术类型而异。对于降低风险的乳房切除术,结果好坏参半。多项临床试验表明抗生素预防并没有显著降低SSI,而一项荟萃分析和一项队列研究表明抗生素可能降低SSI的风险。此外,一项针对超重或肥胖患者的随机对照试验表明,在降低风险的乳房切除术中,抗生素预防可显著降低SSI。在性别确认乳房切除术中,感染率很低(约3%-5%),证据支持术前单剂量预防。对于缩乳,多个系统评价和临床试验表明,预防性治疗可以显著减少SSI。两项随机对照试验表明,将抗生素预防延长至术后期对SSI没有显著影响。对于隆胸,系统评价和临床研究发现预防性抗生素治疗没有显著降低SSI。虽然一项系统综述表明,基于植入物的重建可以减少SSI,但在隆胸中没有观察到这一点。结论:在非肿瘤性乳房手术中使用抗生素预防仍然定义不清,报道的有效性取决于手术类型,治疗持续时间和患者的危险因素。需要进一步的高质量临床试验来充分评估预防性抗生素在非肿瘤性乳房手术中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Nononcologic Breast Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Background: The practice of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in breast surgery remains debated. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature evaluating the current evidence on the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in nononcologic breast surgery, including risk-reducing mastectomy, gender-affirming mastectomy, augmentation, and reduction.

Methods: A literature search of PubMed and Cochrane databases of 1990-2025 was conducted to identify studies evaluating antibiotic prophylaxis and SSI outcomes in nononcologic breast surgery. Included studies were screened and analyzed by procedure type, study design, and outcomes.

Results: The impact of antibiotic prophylaxis varied by procedure type. For risk-reducing mastectomy, the results were mixed. Multiple clinical trials indicated no significant reduction in SSI with antibiotic prophylaxis, while one meta-analysis and one cohort study suggested that antibiotics may decrease the risk of SSI. Additionally, one randomized controlled trial in overweight or obese patients indicated that antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased SSI in risk reducing mastectomy. In gender-affirming mastectomy, infection rates were low (approximately 3%-5%), and evidence supports single-dose preoperative prophylaxis. For breast reduction, multiple systematic reviews and clinical trials indicated a significant reduction in SSI with prophylactic treatment. Two randomized controlled trials indicated that extending antibiotic prophylaxis into the postoperative period had no significant impact on SSI. For breast augmentation, systematic reviews and clinical studies found no significant reduction in SSI with prophylactic antibiotic treatment. While one systematic review suggested SSI reduction in implant-based reconstruction, this was not observed in breast augmentation.

Conclusions: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis within nononcologic breast surgery remains poorly defined, with reported effectiveness varying depending on the type of surgery, duration of treatment, and risk factors of the patient. Further high-quality clinical trials are warranted to fully evaluate the role of prophylactic antibiotic use in nononcologic breast surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信