识别胸痛患者急性主动脉夹层的可解释机器学习方法。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Shuangshuang Li, Kaiwen Zhao, Wen Li, Qingsheng Lu, Jian Zhou, Jia He
{"title":"识别胸痛患者急性主动脉夹层的可解释机器学习方法。","authors":"Shuangshuang Li, Kaiwen Zhao, Wen Li, Qingsheng Lu, Jian Zhou, Jia He","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is using interpretable machine learning methods to construct models by combing routine laboratory examination biomarkers and clinical characteristics to identify acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients from other sudden chest pain patients referring to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research encompassed a cohort of 832 individuals, with 515 of them diagnosed as acute aortic dissection patients. Patients were randomly assigned to training and test groups for model development and evaluation, with data collected from medical records and validated by study physicians. LASSO regression was used for variable selection in the study, which utilized nine machine learning algorithms for model development. The DeLong test compared AUC values among models. Optimal parameters were found through grid search on the training set with 5-fold cross validation. The SHAP method ranks input feature importance and explains model outcomes to address model opacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Utilizing the LASSO regression technique, eight variables were pinpointed for their nonlinear significance. Evaluation of these models using test set data yielded area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.72 and 0.77, suggesting promising utility in differential diagnosis. The Random Forest method demonstrated noteworthy sensitivity, specificity, and F1 Score. The internal validation set consistently yielded results with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.71 to 0.77. The SHAP method was utilized to assess the influence of features on the model, identifying N.L and age as the most significant variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this prognostic study, a machine learning model was created to assist in differentiating patients with aortic dissection from those presenting with chest pain. The use of interpretable machine learning techniques allows for the prioritization of key features, showcasing significant potential for application in supporting the prompt diagnosis and treatment of aortic dissection differentials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches for Identification Acute Aortic Dissection in Chest Pain Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Shuangshuang Li, Kaiwen Zhao, Wen Li, Qingsheng Lu, Jian Zhou, Jia He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is using interpretable machine learning methods to construct models by combing routine laboratory examination biomarkers and clinical characteristics to identify acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients from other sudden chest pain patients referring to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research encompassed a cohort of 832 individuals, with 515 of them diagnosed as acute aortic dissection patients. Patients were randomly assigned to training and test groups for model development and evaluation, with data collected from medical records and validated by study physicians. LASSO regression was used for variable selection in the study, which utilized nine machine learning algorithms for model development. The DeLong test compared AUC values among models. Optimal parameters were found through grid search on the training set with 5-fold cross validation. The SHAP method ranks input feature importance and explains model outcomes to address model opacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Utilizing the LASSO regression technique, eight variables were pinpointed for their nonlinear significance. Evaluation of these models using test set data yielded area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.72 and 0.77, suggesting promising utility in differential diagnosis. The Random Forest method demonstrated noteworthy sensitivity, specificity, and F1 Score. The internal validation set consistently yielded results with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.71 to 0.77. The SHAP method was utilized to assess the influence of features on the model, identifying N.L and age as the most significant variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this prognostic study, a machine learning model was created to assist in differentiating patients with aortic dissection from those presenting with chest pain. The use of interpretable machine learning techniques allows for the prioritization of key features, showcasing significant potential for application in supporting the prompt diagnosis and treatment of aortic dissection differentials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是利用可解释的机器学习方法,结合常规实验室检查生物标志物和临床特征,构建模型,从其他突发性胸痛患者(急性心肌梗死(AMI)、急性肺栓塞(APE)和腹主动脉瘤(AAA)中识别急性主动脉夹层(AAD)患者。方法:研究纳入了832例个体,其中515例诊断为急性主动脉夹层患者。患者被随机分配到训练组和测试组,用于模型开发和评估,数据从医疗记录中收集并由研究医生验证。本研究采用LASSO回归进行变量选择,利用9种机器学习算法进行模型开发。DeLong检验比较了不同模型的AUC值。通过5次交叉验证,在训练集上进行网格搜索,找到最优参数。SHAP方法对输入特征的重要性进行排序,并解释模型结果以解决模型不透明问题。结果:利用LASSO回归技术,确定了8个具有非线性显著性的变量。使用测试集数据对这些模型进行评估,得出曲线下面积(AUC)值在0.72至0.77之间,表明在鉴别诊断中有很好的应用前景。随机森林方法具有显著的敏感性、特异性和F1评分。内部验证集一致得出曲线下面积(AUC)范围为0.71至0.77的结果。利用SHAP方法评估特征对模型的影响,确定N.L和年龄是最显著的变量。结论:在这项预后研究中,建立了一个机器学习模型来帮助区分主动脉夹层患者和胸痛患者。使用可解释的机器学习技术可以对关键特征进行优先排序,在支持主动脉夹层鉴别诊断和治疗方面显示出巨大的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches for Identification Acute Aortic Dissection in Chest Pain Patients.

Background: The aim of this study is using interpretable machine learning methods to construct models by combing routine laboratory examination biomarkers and clinical characteristics to identify acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients from other sudden chest pain patients referring to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

Methods: The research encompassed a cohort of 832 individuals, with 515 of them diagnosed as acute aortic dissection patients. Patients were randomly assigned to training and test groups for model development and evaluation, with data collected from medical records and validated by study physicians. LASSO regression was used for variable selection in the study, which utilized nine machine learning algorithms for model development. The DeLong test compared AUC values among models. Optimal parameters were found through grid search on the training set with 5-fold cross validation. The SHAP method ranks input feature importance and explains model outcomes to address model opacity.

Results: Utilizing the LASSO regression technique, eight variables were pinpointed for their nonlinear significance. Evaluation of these models using test set data yielded area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.72 and 0.77, suggesting promising utility in differential diagnosis. The Random Forest method demonstrated noteworthy sensitivity, specificity, and F1 Score. The internal validation set consistently yielded results with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.71 to 0.77. The SHAP method was utilized to assess the influence of features on the model, identifying N.L and age as the most significant variables.

Conclusion: In this prognostic study, a machine learning model was created to assist in differentiating patients with aortic dissection from those presenting with chest pain. The use of interpretable machine learning techniques allows for the prioritization of key features, showcasing significant potential for application in supporting the prompt diagnosis and treatment of aortic dissection differentials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信