Harshavardhan Shetty, Birva Shah, Joseph Thomas, Sushma Berlukar, Tanvi Rao, Swathi Prabhu, Carlsen Bernard Pereira
{"title":"入院时的血液学生物标志物作为严重烧伤预后的预测指标:来自南印度三级医院的经验","authors":"Harshavardhan Shetty, Birva Shah, Joseph Thomas, Sushma Berlukar, Tanvi Rao, Swathi Prabhu, Carlsen Bernard Pereira","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burns are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with several factors determining mortality. Identifying reliable early predictors of mortality is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and improving outcomes. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in predicting mortality in patients with severe burns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 91 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with severe burns (TBSA ≥20%) admitted within 48 hours of injury. Clinical, etiological, and laboratory parameters were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the predictive value of NLR, PLR, and total body surface area (TBSA) for mortality, with the area under the curve (AUC) indicating their discriminative ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 47.6 years (range: 18-89 years), with a male predominance (57.1%). Thermal burns were the most common etiology (86.8%), followed by electrical burns (11%) and chemical burns (2.2%). The median TBSA of the entire cohort was 42%, of which nonsurvivors had significantly higher median TBSA involvement (52% vs 30%, P = 0.0005) and median duration of hospitalization (DOH) (4 vs 23 days, P = 0.0005). The mean NLR was significantly higher in nonsurvivors (15.2 vs 8.4, P = 0.005). ROC curve analysis identified an optimal NLR cutoff value of 8.19 (AUC = 0.614, 95% CI: 0.497-0.731, P = 0.061) with 56.5% sensitivity and 55.6% specificity. The optimal PLR cutoff value was 186.57 (AUC = 0.461, 95% CI: 0.341-0.581, P = 0.520) with 50% sensitivity and 51% specificity. TBSA cutoff value of 41% was strongly associated with mortality (AUC = 0.86, 95% C.I: 0.781-0.940, P = 0.0005), with 82.6% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher TBSA involvement and elevated NLR are significant predictors of mortality in severe burn patients. Although TBSA >41% is the most reliable prognostic indicator, PLR did not show significant predictive value. Early assessment of these parameters may aid in risk stratification and management of burn patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"95 3S Suppl 1","pages":"S70-S74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hematological Biomarkers at Admission as Predictors of Outcome in Severe Burns: Experience From a South Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Harshavardhan Shetty, Birva Shah, Joseph Thomas, Sushma Berlukar, Tanvi Rao, Swathi Prabhu, Carlsen Bernard Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burns are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with several factors determining mortality. Identifying reliable early predictors of mortality is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and improving outcomes. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in predicting mortality in patients with severe burns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 91 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with severe burns (TBSA ≥20%) admitted within 48 hours of injury. Clinical, etiological, and laboratory parameters were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the predictive value of NLR, PLR, and total body surface area (TBSA) for mortality, with the area under the curve (AUC) indicating their discriminative ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 47.6 years (range: 18-89 years), with a male predominance (57.1%). Thermal burns were the most common etiology (86.8%), followed by electrical burns (11%) and chemical burns (2.2%). The median TBSA of the entire cohort was 42%, of which nonsurvivors had significantly higher median TBSA involvement (52% vs 30%, P = 0.0005) and median duration of hospitalization (DOH) (4 vs 23 days, P = 0.0005). The mean NLR was significantly higher in nonsurvivors (15.2 vs 8.4, P = 0.005). ROC curve analysis identified an optimal NLR cutoff value of 8.19 (AUC = 0.614, 95% CI: 0.497-0.731, P = 0.061) with 56.5% sensitivity and 55.6% specificity. The optimal PLR cutoff value was 186.57 (AUC = 0.461, 95% CI: 0.341-0.581, P = 0.520) with 50% sensitivity and 51% specificity. TBSA cutoff value of 41% was strongly associated with mortality (AUC = 0.86, 95% C.I: 0.781-0.940, P = 0.0005), with 82.6% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher TBSA involvement and elevated NLR are significant predictors of mortality in severe burn patients. Although TBSA >41% is the most reliable prognostic indicator, PLR did not show significant predictive value. Early assessment of these parameters may aid in risk stratification and management of burn patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"95 3S Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S70-S74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004470\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:烧伤与显著的发病率和死亡率相关,有几个因素决定死亡率。确定可靠的死亡率早期预测因子对于指导治疗决策和改善结果至关重要。本研究评估中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在预测严重烧伤患者死亡率中的预后意义。方法:对91例外伤后48小时内入院的严重烧伤(TBSA≥20%)患者(年龄≥18岁)进行回顾性研究。分析临床、病因学和实验室参数。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定NLR、PLR和总体表面积(TBSA)对死亡率的预测价值,曲线下面积(AUC)表示它们的判别能力。结果:队列患者平均年龄47.6岁(18-89岁),男性占57.1%。热烧伤是最常见的病因(86.8%),其次是电烧伤(11%)和化学烧伤(2.2%)。整个队列的中位TBSA为42%,其中非幸存者的中位TBSA受累(52% vs 30%, P = 0.0005)和中位住院时间(DOH) (4 vs 23天,P = 0.0005)显著高于其他患者。非幸存者的平均NLR明显更高(15.2 vs 8.4, P = 0.005)。ROC曲线分析发现,最佳NLR截断值为8.19 (AUC = 0.614, 95% CI: 0.497-0.731, P = 0.061),敏感性56.5%,特异性55.6%。最佳PLR临界值为186.57 (AUC = 0.461, 95% CI: 0.341 ~ 0.581, P = 0.520),敏感性50%,特异性51%。TBSA临界值为41%与死亡率密切相关(AUC = 0.86, 95% ci: 0.781-0.940, P = 0.0005),敏感性为82.6%,特异性为77.8%。结论:TBSA受累和NLR升高是严重烧伤患者死亡率的重要预测因素。虽然TBSA >41%是最可靠的预后指标,但PLR没有显着的预测价值。早期评估这些参数可能有助于烧伤患者的风险分层和管理。
Hematological Biomarkers at Admission as Predictors of Outcome in Severe Burns: Experience From a South Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.
Background: Burns are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with several factors determining mortality. Identifying reliable early predictors of mortality is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and improving outcomes. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in predicting mortality in patients with severe burns.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 91 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with severe burns (TBSA ≥20%) admitted within 48 hours of injury. Clinical, etiological, and laboratory parameters were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the predictive value of NLR, PLR, and total body surface area (TBSA) for mortality, with the area under the curve (AUC) indicating their discriminative ability.
Results: The mean age of the cohort was 47.6 years (range: 18-89 years), with a male predominance (57.1%). Thermal burns were the most common etiology (86.8%), followed by electrical burns (11%) and chemical burns (2.2%). The median TBSA of the entire cohort was 42%, of which nonsurvivors had significantly higher median TBSA involvement (52% vs 30%, P = 0.0005) and median duration of hospitalization (DOH) (4 vs 23 days, P = 0.0005). The mean NLR was significantly higher in nonsurvivors (15.2 vs 8.4, P = 0.005). ROC curve analysis identified an optimal NLR cutoff value of 8.19 (AUC = 0.614, 95% CI: 0.497-0.731, P = 0.061) with 56.5% sensitivity and 55.6% specificity. The optimal PLR cutoff value was 186.57 (AUC = 0.461, 95% CI: 0.341-0.581, P = 0.520) with 50% sensitivity and 51% specificity. TBSA cutoff value of 41% was strongly associated with mortality (AUC = 0.86, 95% C.I: 0.781-0.940, P = 0.0005), with 82.6% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity.
Conclusions: Higher TBSA involvement and elevated NLR are significant predictors of mortality in severe burn patients. Although TBSA >41% is the most reliable prognostic indicator, PLR did not show significant predictive value. Early assessment of these parameters may aid in risk stratification and management of burn patients.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.