McKenna M Halverson, Evyn Y Appel, Valerie A Earnshaw, Grace Sands, Raquelle Powell, Maya Rozin, Tania Cruz Cordero, Nithila Chrisostam, Nicole Kennedy, Sarah E Katz, Shreela V Sharma, Allison Karpyn
{"title":"美国成年人中与食品不安全相关的耻辱:范围审查。","authors":"McKenna M Halverson, Evyn Y Appel, Valerie A Earnshaw, Grace Sands, Raquelle Powell, Maya Rozin, Tania Cruz Cordero, Nithila Chrisostam, Nicole Kennedy, Sarah E Katz, Shreela V Sharma, Allison Karpyn","doi":"10.1177/08901171251375977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo characterize individual- and structural-level stigma associated with government (ie, SNAP, WIC) and emergency food program (ie, food banks, pantries, cupboards, soup kitchens) utilization in the US.Data Source5 databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts) were searched in June 2024.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaIncluded peer-reviewed articles (January 2004 - June 2024), in the US, in English, original research or systematic reviews, and report on data closely related to general food insecurity, government and emergency food program participation, and stigma manifestations among adults.Data ExtractionData on study characteristics and stigma were extracted using a structured template.Data SynthesisDescriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used.ResultsOur search yielded 99 articles. A majority studied individual-level stigma (57.4%) and used qualitative designs (62.6%). Among the 9 identified populations, food insecure adults were the most frequently studied (25.2%). Anticipated stigma (29.8%) was the most commonly reported stigma manifestation, deterring program participation.ConclusionThis review underscores the significance of addressing food insecurity-related stigma to enhance the effectiveness of food assistance programs. Given the extensive evidence of the impact of stigma on program participation, policymakers and program administrators should design, implement and test strategies to address stigma. Future research should explore intersectional stigma, develop a food insecurity-related stigma measure, and evaluate stigma-reduction interventions longitudinally and across program settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251375977"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Insecurity-Related Stigma Among Adults in the United States: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"McKenna M Halverson, Evyn Y Appel, Valerie A Earnshaw, Grace Sands, Raquelle Powell, Maya Rozin, Tania Cruz Cordero, Nithila Chrisostam, Nicole Kennedy, Sarah E Katz, Shreela V Sharma, Allison Karpyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171251375977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo characterize individual- and structural-level stigma associated with government (ie, SNAP, WIC) and emergency food program (ie, food banks, pantries, cupboards, soup kitchens) utilization in the US.Data Source5 databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts) were searched in June 2024.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaIncluded peer-reviewed articles (January 2004 - June 2024), in the US, in English, original research or systematic reviews, and report on data closely related to general food insecurity, government and emergency food program participation, and stigma manifestations among adults.Data ExtractionData on study characteristics and stigma were extracted using a structured template.Data SynthesisDescriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used.ResultsOur search yielded 99 articles. A majority studied individual-level stigma (57.4%) and used qualitative designs (62.6%). Among the 9 identified populations, food insecure adults were the most frequently studied (25.2%). Anticipated stigma (29.8%) was the most commonly reported stigma manifestation, deterring program participation.ConclusionThis review underscores the significance of addressing food insecurity-related stigma to enhance the effectiveness of food assistance programs. Given the extensive evidence of the impact of stigma on program participation, policymakers and program administrators should design, implement and test strategies to address stigma. Future research should explore intersectional stigma, develop a food insecurity-related stigma measure, and evaluate stigma-reduction interventions longitudinally and across program settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171251375977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251375977\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251375977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的描述美国与政府(即SNAP、WIC)和紧急食品计划(即食品银行、食品储藏室、橱柜、施粥所)利用相关的个人和结构层面的耻辱。数据源5数据库(PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts)于2024年6月检索。研究纳入和排除标准纳入同行评议的文章(2004年1月- 2024年6月),美国,英文,原始研究或系统综述,以及与一般食品不安全,政府和紧急食品计划参与以及成人中耻辱表现密切相关的数据报告。数据提取使用结构化模板提取研究特征和柱头的数据。数据综合采用描述性统计和专题分析。我们检索了99篇文章。大多数研究的是个体层面的病耻感(57.4%),采用定性设计(62.6%)。在确定的9个人群中,粮食不安全的成年人是最常被研究的(25.2%)。预期的病耻感(29.8%)是最常见的病耻感表现,阻碍了项目的参与。结论本综述强调了解决与粮食不安全相关的污名对于提高粮食援助计划的有效性的重要性。鉴于耻辱对项目参与的影响的广泛证据,政策制定者和项目管理者应该设计、实施和测试解决耻辱的策略。未来的研究应该探索交叉病耻感,开发与粮食不安全相关的病耻感测量,并纵向和跨项目设置评估减少病耻感的干预措施。
Food Insecurity-Related Stigma Among Adults in the United States: A Scoping Review.
ObjectiveTo characterize individual- and structural-level stigma associated with government (ie, SNAP, WIC) and emergency food program (ie, food banks, pantries, cupboards, soup kitchens) utilization in the US.Data Source5 databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts) were searched in June 2024.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaIncluded peer-reviewed articles (January 2004 - June 2024), in the US, in English, original research or systematic reviews, and report on data closely related to general food insecurity, government and emergency food program participation, and stigma manifestations among adults.Data ExtractionData on study characteristics and stigma were extracted using a structured template.Data SynthesisDescriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used.ResultsOur search yielded 99 articles. A majority studied individual-level stigma (57.4%) and used qualitative designs (62.6%). Among the 9 identified populations, food insecure adults were the most frequently studied (25.2%). Anticipated stigma (29.8%) was the most commonly reported stigma manifestation, deterring program participation.ConclusionThis review underscores the significance of addressing food insecurity-related stigma to enhance the effectiveness of food assistance programs. Given the extensive evidence of the impact of stigma on program participation, policymakers and program administrators should design, implement and test strategies to address stigma. Future research should explore intersectional stigma, develop a food insecurity-related stigma measure, and evaluate stigma-reduction interventions longitudinally and across program settings.
期刊介绍:
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.