Sarvapriya M. Tripathi;Himanshu Upadhyay;Jayesh Soni
{"title":"利用QNN和QLSTM分析Ansätze可表达性和复杂性及其对分类精度的影响","authors":"Sarvapriya M. Tripathi;Himanshu Upadhyay;Jayesh Soni","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3604721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) and Quantum Long Short-Term Memory (QLSTM) models are emerging as powerful tools in quantum machine learning. The effectiveness of these models is largely governed by the structure of their parameterized quantum circuits, also known as Ansätze. The Expressibility (measure of how well an ansätz can explore Hilbert space), Entanglement (which governs the correlation between states of multiple qubits), and Depth (a measure of how many layers of quantum gates a circuit has) are fundamental to a model’s capacity to learn complex patterns. In this paper, we analyze how varying these attributes for various ansätze influences classification cost and accuracy. We evaluated QNN and QLSTM models across three cybersecurity datasets using ten ansätze with varying expressibility and complexity. Results showed that ansätze with lower expressibility and complexity achieved accuracy and training stability comparable to the more complex ones. Additionally, we found that QNN models consistently offered a better trade-off between accuracy, training time, and computational efficiency compared to QLSTM models.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"152412-152429"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11145787","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Ansätze Expressibility and Complexity and Their Impact on Classification Accuracy Using QNN and QLSTM\",\"authors\":\"Sarvapriya M. Tripathi;Himanshu Upadhyay;Jayesh Soni\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3604721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) and Quantum Long Short-Term Memory (QLSTM) models are emerging as powerful tools in quantum machine learning. The effectiveness of these models is largely governed by the structure of their parameterized quantum circuits, also known as Ansätze. The Expressibility (measure of how well an ansätz can explore Hilbert space), Entanglement (which governs the correlation between states of multiple qubits), and Depth (a measure of how many layers of quantum gates a circuit has) are fundamental to a model’s capacity to learn complex patterns. In this paper, we analyze how varying these attributes for various ansätze influences classification cost and accuracy. We evaluated QNN and QLSTM models across three cybersecurity datasets using ten ansätze with varying expressibility and complexity. Results showed that ansätze with lower expressibility and complexity achieved accuracy and training stability comparable to the more complex ones. Additionally, we found that QNN models consistently offered a better trade-off between accuracy, training time, and computational efficiency compared to QLSTM models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Access\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"152412-152429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11145787\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11145787/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11145787/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of Ansätze Expressibility and Complexity and Their Impact on Classification Accuracy Using QNN and QLSTM
Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) and Quantum Long Short-Term Memory (QLSTM) models are emerging as powerful tools in quantum machine learning. The effectiveness of these models is largely governed by the structure of their parameterized quantum circuits, also known as Ansätze. The Expressibility (measure of how well an ansätz can explore Hilbert space), Entanglement (which governs the correlation between states of multiple qubits), and Depth (a measure of how many layers of quantum gates a circuit has) are fundamental to a model’s capacity to learn complex patterns. In this paper, we analyze how varying these attributes for various ansätze influences classification cost and accuracy. We evaluated QNN and QLSTM models across three cybersecurity datasets using ten ansätze with varying expressibility and complexity. Results showed that ansätze with lower expressibility and complexity achieved accuracy and training stability comparable to the more complex ones. Additionally, we found that QNN models consistently offered a better trade-off between accuracy, training time, and computational efficiency compared to QLSTM models.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.