使用监督机器学习技术的工业过程报警预测和分类:阿尔及利亚天然气厂的案例研究

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Samir Sekiou , Ali Behloul , Rachid Nait-Said , Zakarya Chiremsel
{"title":"使用监督机器学习技术的工业过程报警预测和分类:阿尔及利亚天然气厂的案例研究","authors":"Samir Sekiou ,&nbsp;Ali Behloul ,&nbsp;Rachid Nait-Said ,&nbsp;Zakarya Chiremsel","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alarm systems are a crucial tool designed to enhance safety levels and ensure the normal functioning of industrial plants, maintaining safe and efficient operations. During industrial process upsets, numerous conflicting and false alarms may trigger simultaneously (alarm floods), leading to confusion and creating significant challenges for operators. These alarm floods affect operators' response time making their intervention extremely difficult. In such abnormal situations, alarm classification and prioritization become crucial, significantly aiding operators by allowing them to promptly and appropriately address safety-critical alarms first, rather than dealing with false or lower-priority alarms. Meanwhile, Machine Learning (ML) is a powerful tool for information extraction that has significantly contributed to knowledge discovery and decision-making. It has been successfully applied in various fields, including fault detection and diagnosis. ML can help address the issue of process alarms by classifying and prioritizing them. This paper presents a Machine Learning-based model (Random Forest) capable of classifying and predicting alarms in industrial processes. Then, it compares its performance to well-known classifiers, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and other supervised machine learning models such as Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Logistic Regression. The performance of these models was rigorously evaluated based on Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and prediction speed. The results from our final simulations show that the RF model achieved the highest Accuracy (98.32%) and F1-Score (0.988), along with a very high Recall (0.987) and precision (0.983). While the RF model demonstrated superior predictive performance in these metrics, it had a slower prediction speed (0.3477 ms per observation) comparing to other models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 109378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alarms prediction and classification in industrial processes using supervised machine learning techniques: A case study in an Algerian gas plant\",\"authors\":\"Samir Sekiou ,&nbsp;Ali Behloul ,&nbsp;Rachid Nait-Said ,&nbsp;Zakarya Chiremsel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Alarm systems are a crucial tool designed to enhance safety levels and ensure the normal functioning of industrial plants, maintaining safe and efficient operations. During industrial process upsets, numerous conflicting and false alarms may trigger simultaneously (alarm floods), leading to confusion and creating significant challenges for operators. These alarm floods affect operators' response time making their intervention extremely difficult. In such abnormal situations, alarm classification and prioritization become crucial, significantly aiding operators by allowing them to promptly and appropriately address safety-critical alarms first, rather than dealing with false or lower-priority alarms. Meanwhile, Machine Learning (ML) is a powerful tool for information extraction that has significantly contributed to knowledge discovery and decision-making. It has been successfully applied in various fields, including fault detection and diagnosis. ML can help address the issue of process alarms by classifying and prioritizing them. This paper presents a Machine Learning-based model (Random Forest) capable of classifying and predicting alarms in industrial processes. Then, it compares its performance to well-known classifiers, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and other supervised machine learning models such as Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Logistic Regression. The performance of these models was rigorously evaluated based on Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and prediction speed. The results from our final simulations show that the RF model achieved the highest Accuracy (98.32%) and F1-Score (0.988), along with a very high Recall (0.987) and precision (0.983). While the RF model demonstrated superior predictive performance in these metrics, it had a slower prediction speed (0.3477 ms per observation) comparing to other models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425003813\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425003813","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

警报系统是一个重要的工具,旨在提高安全水平,确保工业工厂的正常运作,保持安全和高效的运行。在工业过程中,可能会同时触发许多冲突和假警报(报警洪水),导致混乱并给运营商带来重大挑战。这些报警洪水影响了作业者的响应时间,使他们的干预变得极其困难。在这种异常情况下,报警分类和优先级排序变得至关重要,它可以帮助操作员及时、适当地优先处理安全关键报警,而不是处理虚假或低优先级报警。同时,机器学习(ML)是一种强大的信息提取工具,对知识发现和决策做出了重要贡献。它已经成功地应用于各个领域,包括故障检测和诊断。ML可以通过分类和确定优先级来帮助解决过程警报的问题。本文提出了一种基于机器学习的模型(随机森林),能够对工业过程中的报警进行分类和预测。然后,将其性能与知名分类器进行比较,包括支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)和其他监督机器学习模型,如决策树、k近邻和逻辑回归。这些模型的性能根据准确性、精度、召回率、F1-Score和预测速度进行了严格的评估。最后的仿真结果表明,RF模型达到了最高的准确率(98.32%)和F1-Score(0.988),以及非常高的召回率(0.987)和精度(0.983)。虽然RF模型在这些指标中表现出优越的预测性能,但与其他模型相比,它的预测速度较慢(每次观测0.3477 ms)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alarms prediction and classification in industrial processes using supervised machine learning techniques: A case study in an Algerian gas plant
Alarm systems are a crucial tool designed to enhance safety levels and ensure the normal functioning of industrial plants, maintaining safe and efficient operations. During industrial process upsets, numerous conflicting and false alarms may trigger simultaneously (alarm floods), leading to confusion and creating significant challenges for operators. These alarm floods affect operators' response time making their intervention extremely difficult. In such abnormal situations, alarm classification and prioritization become crucial, significantly aiding operators by allowing them to promptly and appropriately address safety-critical alarms first, rather than dealing with false or lower-priority alarms. Meanwhile, Machine Learning (ML) is a powerful tool for information extraction that has significantly contributed to knowledge discovery and decision-making. It has been successfully applied in various fields, including fault detection and diagnosis. ML can help address the issue of process alarms by classifying and prioritizing them. This paper presents a Machine Learning-based model (Random Forest) capable of classifying and predicting alarms in industrial processes. Then, it compares its performance to well-known classifiers, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and other supervised machine learning models such as Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Logistic Regression. The performance of these models was rigorously evaluated based on Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and prediction speed. The results from our final simulations show that the RF model achieved the highest Accuracy (98.32%) and F1-Score (0.988), along with a very high Recall (0.987) and precision (0.983). While the RF model demonstrated superior predictive performance in these metrics, it had a slower prediction speed (0.3477 ms per observation) comparing to other models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信