南非西开普省碰撞后护理基于共识的研究重点

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Naseef Abdullah , Tim Nutbeam , Colleen J. Saunders , Craig Wylie , Nigel Lang , Willem Stassen
{"title":"南非西开普省碰撞后护理基于共识的研究重点","authors":"Naseef Abdullah ,&nbsp;Tim Nutbeam ,&nbsp;Colleen J. Saunders ,&nbsp;Craig Wylie ,&nbsp;Nigel Lang ,&nbsp;Willem Stassen","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2025.100900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Road traffic injuries constitute a significant global health burden, causing 1.3 million deaths and 50 million injuries annually, with 92 % of fatalities occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite this disproportionate impact, research priorities in post-collision care often reflect high-income country contexts, creating a critical misalignment between evidence generation and contextual realities in LMICs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This mixed-methods study employed a three-phase approach to identify research priorities for post-collision care in the Western Cape, South Africa. Phase 1 consisted of a comprehensive literature review to identify preliminary thematic areas and research questions. Phase 2 involved a stakeholder engagement workshop using modified nominal group techniques (NGT) with purposively sampled participants representing emergency medical services, fire services, law enforcement, community members and academia. Phase 3 entailed systematic prioritisation, where participants independently scored each theme and associated research questions on a Likert scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight thematic domains were identified and ranked in order of priority. EMS safety (highest priority), communication and coordination, public awareness and prevention, transportation and access to care, first-responder capabilities, training implementation, resource optimisation, disaster and mass casualty management, and specialised care accessibility. The highest-ranked individual research question concerned the minimum set of practical skills and resources required by first responders to effectively provide immediate post-collision care. Technological integration emerged as a cross-cutting priority across multiple themes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study represents the first published systematic approach to identifying post-collision care research priorities in South Africa. Diverging from previous exercises that emphasise advanced interventions or system integration, this study highlights foundational challenges of EMS safety and communication as top priorities, reflecting the contextual realities of emergency service delivery in South Africa. The findings provide a strategic roadmap for researchers, funders, and policymakers to direct resources toward questions with maximal potential to improve post-collision care and strengthen health systems in similar LMIC contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"15 4","pages":"Article 100900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus-based research priorities for post-collision care in the Western Cape province of South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Naseef Abdullah ,&nbsp;Tim Nutbeam ,&nbsp;Colleen J. Saunders ,&nbsp;Craig Wylie ,&nbsp;Nigel Lang ,&nbsp;Willem Stassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.afjem.2025.100900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Road traffic injuries constitute a significant global health burden, causing 1.3 million deaths and 50 million injuries annually, with 92 % of fatalities occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite this disproportionate impact, research priorities in post-collision care often reflect high-income country contexts, creating a critical misalignment between evidence generation and contextual realities in LMICs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This mixed-methods study employed a three-phase approach to identify research priorities for post-collision care in the Western Cape, South Africa. Phase 1 consisted of a comprehensive literature review to identify preliminary thematic areas and research questions. Phase 2 involved a stakeholder engagement workshop using modified nominal group techniques (NGT) with purposively sampled participants representing emergency medical services, fire services, law enforcement, community members and academia. Phase 3 entailed systematic prioritisation, where participants independently scored each theme and associated research questions on a Likert scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight thematic domains were identified and ranked in order of priority. EMS safety (highest priority), communication and coordination, public awareness and prevention, transportation and access to care, first-responder capabilities, training implementation, resource optimisation, disaster and mass casualty management, and specialised care accessibility. The highest-ranked individual research question concerned the minimum set of practical skills and resources required by first responders to effectively provide immediate post-collision care. Technological integration emerged as a cross-cutting priority across multiple themes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study represents the first published systematic approach to identifying post-collision care research priorities in South Africa. Diverging from previous exercises that emphasise advanced interventions or system integration, this study highlights foundational challenges of EMS safety and communication as top priorities, reflecting the contextual realities of emergency service delivery in South Africa. The findings provide a strategic roadmap for researchers, funders, and policymakers to direct resources toward questions with maximal potential to improve post-collision care and strengthen health systems in similar LMIC contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100900\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X25000400\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X25000400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道路交通伤害是一个重大的全球健康负担,每年造成130万人死亡和5000万人受伤,其中92%的死亡发生在低收入和中等收入国家。尽管存在这种不成比例的影响,但碰撞后护理的研究重点往往反映高收入国家的情况,从而在中低收入国家的证据生成与背景现实之间造成严重不一致。方法这项混合方法研究采用三阶段方法来确定南非西开普省碰撞后护理的研究重点。第一阶段包括全面的文献综述,以确定初步的专题领域和研究问题。第二阶段涉及一个利益攸关方参与讲习班,使用改进的名义团体技术(NGT),有目的地抽样了代表紧急医疗服务、消防服务、执法部门、社区成员和学术界的参与者。第三阶段需要系统的优先排序,参与者在李克特量表上独立地对每个主题和相关研究问题进行评分。结果确定了8个专题领域,并对其进行了优先级排序。EMS安全(最高优先级)、沟通和协调、公众意识和预防、运输和获得护理、第一响应者能力、培训实施、资源优化、灾难和大规模伤亡管理,以及专业护理的可及性。排名最高的个人研究问题涉及第一响应者有效提供碰撞后立即护理所需的最低实用技能和资源。技术整合成为跨多个主题的跨领域优先事项。该研究代表了首次发表的确定南非碰撞后护理研究重点的系统方法。与以往强调先进干预措施或系统集成的演习不同,本研究强调了EMS安全和通信的基本挑战,将其作为首要任务,反映了南非紧急服务提供的背景现实。研究结果为研究人员、资助者和政策制定者提供了一个战略路线图,以便将资源用于最有可能改善碰撞后护理和加强类似低收入和中等收入国家卫生系统的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus-based research priorities for post-collision care in the Western Cape province of South Africa

Introduction

Road traffic injuries constitute a significant global health burden, causing 1.3 million deaths and 50 million injuries annually, with 92 % of fatalities occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite this disproportionate impact, research priorities in post-collision care often reflect high-income country contexts, creating a critical misalignment between evidence generation and contextual realities in LMICs.

Methods

This mixed-methods study employed a three-phase approach to identify research priorities for post-collision care in the Western Cape, South Africa. Phase 1 consisted of a comprehensive literature review to identify preliminary thematic areas and research questions. Phase 2 involved a stakeholder engagement workshop using modified nominal group techniques (NGT) with purposively sampled participants representing emergency medical services, fire services, law enforcement, community members and academia. Phase 3 entailed systematic prioritisation, where participants independently scored each theme and associated research questions on a Likert scale.

Results

Eight thematic domains were identified and ranked in order of priority. EMS safety (highest priority), communication and coordination, public awareness and prevention, transportation and access to care, first-responder capabilities, training implementation, resource optimisation, disaster and mass casualty management, and specialised care accessibility. The highest-ranked individual research question concerned the minimum set of practical skills and resources required by first responders to effectively provide immediate post-collision care. Technological integration emerged as a cross-cutting priority across multiple themes.

Conclusion

The study represents the first published systematic approach to identifying post-collision care research priorities in South Africa. Diverging from previous exercises that emphasise advanced interventions or system integration, this study highlights foundational challenges of EMS safety and communication as top priorities, reflecting the contextual realities of emergency service delivery in South Africa. The findings provide a strategic roadmap for researchers, funders, and policymakers to direct resources toward questions with maximal potential to improve post-collision care and strengthen health systems in similar LMIC contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信