{"title":"环境心理学的价值类型学研究","authors":"Désirée F. Schmid , Tobias Brosch , Nadja Contzen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global environmental challenges existentially threaten not only the environment but also human health. To initiate the individual and societal changes needed to address these challenges effectively, change strategies need to be guided by an in-depth understanding of the psychological factors that influence environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors. In environmental psychology, personal values have been identified as key antecedents of pro-environmental perceptions and behaviors. However, the dominant value approach in the field has three shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the dominant value typologies appear to consider a limited number and conceptual range of value orientations. Second, the value orientations vary significantly in their conceptual distinctness and the range of specific goals they include. Third, some value orientations may have limited construct validity due to a mismatch between their operationalization and definitions. Our study addresses the first two shortcomings by developing a refined typology of environmentally relevant values based on a systematic literature review. We included 773 academic records and applied qualitative thematic analysis to synthesize the data. We identified 131 distinct values, which form 38 motivational types, referred to as value orientations. These were grouped into 12 higher-order value orientations that reflect overarching motivations: nature welfare, animal welfare, human welfare, temperance, conservatism, societal stability, in-group welfare, personal welfare, superiority, sensualism, flourishment and enlightenment. The proposed typology of environmentally relevant values extends the dominant value typologies in environmental psychology. Our work lays the foundation for a refined value approach, whose value orientations are expected to have greater explanatory power and provide more precise insights into the value underpinnings of environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102740"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a refined value typology for environmental psychology\",\"authors\":\"Désirée F. Schmid , Tobias Brosch , Nadja Contzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Global environmental challenges existentially threaten not only the environment but also human health. To initiate the individual and societal changes needed to address these challenges effectively, change strategies need to be guided by an in-depth understanding of the psychological factors that influence environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors. In environmental psychology, personal values have been identified as key antecedents of pro-environmental perceptions and behaviors. However, the dominant value approach in the field has three shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the dominant value typologies appear to consider a limited number and conceptual range of value orientations. Second, the value orientations vary significantly in their conceptual distinctness and the range of specific goals they include. Third, some value orientations may have limited construct validity due to a mismatch between their operationalization and definitions. Our study addresses the first two shortcomings by developing a refined typology of environmentally relevant values based on a systematic literature review. We included 773 academic records and applied qualitative thematic analysis to synthesize the data. We identified 131 distinct values, which form 38 motivational types, referred to as value orientations. These were grouped into 12 higher-order value orientations that reflect overarching motivations: nature welfare, animal welfare, human welfare, temperance, conservatism, societal stability, in-group welfare, personal welfare, superiority, sensualism, flourishment and enlightenment. The proposed typology of environmentally relevant values extends the dominant value typologies in environmental psychology. Our work lays the foundation for a refined value approach, whose value orientations are expected to have greater explanatory power and provide more precise insights into the value underpinnings of environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards a refined value typology for environmental psychology
Global environmental challenges existentially threaten not only the environment but also human health. To initiate the individual and societal changes needed to address these challenges effectively, change strategies need to be guided by an in-depth understanding of the psychological factors that influence environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors. In environmental psychology, personal values have been identified as key antecedents of pro-environmental perceptions and behaviors. However, the dominant value approach in the field has three shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the dominant value typologies appear to consider a limited number and conceptual range of value orientations. Second, the value orientations vary significantly in their conceptual distinctness and the range of specific goals they include. Third, some value orientations may have limited construct validity due to a mismatch between their operationalization and definitions. Our study addresses the first two shortcomings by developing a refined typology of environmentally relevant values based on a systematic literature review. We included 773 academic records and applied qualitative thematic analysis to synthesize the data. We identified 131 distinct values, which form 38 motivational types, referred to as value orientations. These were grouped into 12 higher-order value orientations that reflect overarching motivations: nature welfare, animal welfare, human welfare, temperance, conservatism, societal stability, in-group welfare, personal welfare, superiority, sensualism, flourishment and enlightenment. The proposed typology of environmentally relevant values extends the dominant value typologies in environmental psychology. Our work lays the foundation for a refined value approach, whose value orientations are expected to have greater explanatory power and provide more precise insights into the value underpinnings of environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space