环境心理学的价值类型学研究

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Désirée F. Schmid , Tobias Brosch , Nadja Contzen
{"title":"环境心理学的价值类型学研究","authors":"Désirée F. Schmid ,&nbsp;Tobias Brosch ,&nbsp;Nadja Contzen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global environmental challenges existentially threaten not only the environment but also human health. To initiate the individual and societal changes needed to address these challenges effectively, change strategies need to be guided by an in-depth understanding of the psychological factors that influence environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors. In environmental psychology, personal values have been identified as key antecedents of pro-environmental perceptions and behaviors. However, the dominant value approach in the field has three shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the dominant value typologies appear to consider a limited number and conceptual range of value orientations. Second, the value orientations vary significantly in their conceptual distinctness and the range of specific goals they include. Third, some value orientations may have limited construct validity due to a mismatch between their operationalization and definitions. Our study addresses the first two shortcomings by developing a refined typology of environmentally relevant values based on a systematic literature review. We included 773 academic records and applied qualitative thematic analysis to synthesize the data. We identified 131 distinct values, which form 38 motivational types, referred to as value orientations. These were grouped into 12 higher-order value orientations that reflect overarching motivations: nature welfare, animal welfare, human welfare, temperance, conservatism, societal stability, in-group welfare, personal welfare, superiority, sensualism, flourishment and enlightenment. The proposed typology of environmentally relevant values extends the dominant value typologies in environmental psychology. Our work lays the foundation for a refined value approach, whose value orientations are expected to have greater explanatory power and provide more precise insights into the value underpinnings of environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102740"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a refined value typology for environmental psychology\",\"authors\":\"Désirée F. Schmid ,&nbsp;Tobias Brosch ,&nbsp;Nadja Contzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Global environmental challenges existentially threaten not only the environment but also human health. To initiate the individual and societal changes needed to address these challenges effectively, change strategies need to be guided by an in-depth understanding of the psychological factors that influence environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors. In environmental psychology, personal values have been identified as key antecedents of pro-environmental perceptions and behaviors. However, the dominant value approach in the field has three shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the dominant value typologies appear to consider a limited number and conceptual range of value orientations. Second, the value orientations vary significantly in their conceptual distinctness and the range of specific goals they include. Third, some value orientations may have limited construct validity due to a mismatch between their operationalization and definitions. Our study addresses the first two shortcomings by developing a refined typology of environmentally relevant values based on a systematic literature review. We included 773 academic records and applied qualitative thematic analysis to synthesize the data. We identified 131 distinct values, which form 38 motivational types, referred to as value orientations. These were grouped into 12 higher-order value orientations that reflect overarching motivations: nature welfare, animal welfare, human welfare, temperance, conservatism, societal stability, in-group welfare, personal welfare, superiority, sensualism, flourishment and enlightenment. The proposed typology of environmentally relevant values extends the dominant value typologies in environmental psychology. Our work lays the foundation for a refined value approach, whose value orientations are expected to have greater explanatory power and provide more precise insights into the value underpinnings of environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球环境挑战不仅威胁着环境,也威胁着人类健康。要发起有效应对这些挑战所需的个人和社会变革,变革战略必须以对影响与环境有关的观念和行为的心理因素的深入了解为指导。在环境心理学中,个人价值观被认为是亲环境观念和行为的关键前提。然而,在该领域占主导地位的价值方法有三个缺点需要解决。首先,占主导地位的价值类型学似乎只考虑有限数量和概念范围的价值取向。第二,价值取向在概念的明确性和具体目标的范围上存在显著差异。第三,一些价值取向由于其操作化和定义之间的不匹配,可能具有有限的构造有效性。我们的研究通过在系统文献回顾的基础上开发环境相关价值的精炼类型来解决前两个缺点。我们纳入了773份学术记录,并应用定性专题分析来综合数据。我们确定了131种不同的价值观,形成了38种激励类型,称为价值取向。这些价值取向被分为12个高阶价值取向,反映了总体动机:自然福利、动物福利、人类福利、节制、保守、社会稳定、群体福利、个人福利、优越感、感官享受、繁荣和启蒙。提出的环境相关价值类型学扩展了环境心理学中占主导地位的价值类型学。我们的工作为完善的价值方法奠定了基础,其价值取向有望具有更大的解释力,并为环境相关感知和行为的价值基础提供更精确的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a refined value typology for environmental psychology
Global environmental challenges existentially threaten not only the environment but also human health. To initiate the individual and societal changes needed to address these challenges effectively, change strategies need to be guided by an in-depth understanding of the psychological factors that influence environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors. In environmental psychology, personal values have been identified as key antecedents of pro-environmental perceptions and behaviors. However, the dominant value approach in the field has three shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the dominant value typologies appear to consider a limited number and conceptual range of value orientations. Second, the value orientations vary significantly in their conceptual distinctness and the range of specific goals they include. Third, some value orientations may have limited construct validity due to a mismatch between their operationalization and definitions. Our study addresses the first two shortcomings by developing a refined typology of environmentally relevant values based on a systematic literature review. We included 773 academic records and applied qualitative thematic analysis to synthesize the data. We identified 131 distinct values, which form 38 motivational types, referred to as value orientations. These were grouped into 12 higher-order value orientations that reflect overarching motivations: nature welfare, animal welfare, human welfare, temperance, conservatism, societal stability, in-group welfare, personal welfare, superiority, sensualism, flourishment and enlightenment. The proposed typology of environmentally relevant values extends the dominant value typologies in environmental psychology. Our work lays the foundation for a refined value approach, whose value orientations are expected to have greater explanatory power and provide more precise insights into the value underpinnings of environmentally relevant perceptions and behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信