衡量公民对新兴能源技术——核微反应堆的偏好

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Mark Peterson , Shawn Enriques , Rob Godby , David Feldman
{"title":"衡量公民对新兴能源技术——核微反应堆的偏好","authors":"Mark Peterson ,&nbsp;Shawn Enriques ,&nbsp;Rob Godby ,&nbsp;David Feldman","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear microreactors (NMRs) are an emerging energy innovation designed for small-scale and transportable energy production. The long-range development of NMRs must account not only for technical functionality but also for social acceptance. Drawing on principles from technology assessment, this study advocates for including citizen survey research in the front end of new-product development (NPD) for nuclear microreactors when fielding a commercially viable version of an NMR remains “over the horizon” and years away. Citizen input gathered through discrete-choice methods, such as those used in this study, can reveal how trade-offs in cost to citizens, safety, employment, waste handling, and environmental impacts influence public support for NMRs. Such knowledge of citizen preferences can powerfully inform developers of technologies, such as NMRs, on how to make changes in these new technologies so that NMRs align with citizen preferences and thereby increase the social acceptability of NMRs. In the current study, citizens in Wyoming and Alaska gave the most importance to NMRs that can reduce their electric utility bills and minimize the storage and transportation of nuclear waste. Researchers used the importance weights for the dimensions used in the study to derive four segments of citizens using clustering analysis: 1) skeptics, 2) nuclear supporters, 3) nuclear waste concerned, and 4) jobs-focused. For policymakers, the results of the segmentation analysis suggest that those supporting NMRs in the development process account for 53 percent of the sample, while those opposed to or concerned about nuclear waste and its transportation account for 47 percent—comparable percentages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103046"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gauging citizen preferences for the emerging energy-technology of nuclear microreactors\",\"authors\":\"Mark Peterson ,&nbsp;Shawn Enriques ,&nbsp;Rob Godby ,&nbsp;David Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nuclear microreactors (NMRs) are an emerging energy innovation designed for small-scale and transportable energy production. The long-range development of NMRs must account not only for technical functionality but also for social acceptance. Drawing on principles from technology assessment, this study advocates for including citizen survey research in the front end of new-product development (NPD) for nuclear microreactors when fielding a commercially viable version of an NMR remains “over the horizon” and years away. Citizen input gathered through discrete-choice methods, such as those used in this study, can reveal how trade-offs in cost to citizens, safety, employment, waste handling, and environmental impacts influence public support for NMRs. Such knowledge of citizen preferences can powerfully inform developers of technologies, such as NMRs, on how to make changes in these new technologies so that NMRs align with citizen preferences and thereby increase the social acceptability of NMRs. In the current study, citizens in Wyoming and Alaska gave the most importance to NMRs that can reduce their electric utility bills and minimize the storage and transportation of nuclear waste. Researchers used the importance weights for the dimensions used in the study to derive four segments of citizens using clustering analysis: 1) skeptics, 2) nuclear supporters, 3) nuclear waste concerned, and 4) jobs-focused. For policymakers, the results of the segmentation analysis suggest that those supporting NMRs in the development process account for 53 percent of the sample, while those opposed to or concerned about nuclear waste and its transportation account for 47 percent—comparable percentages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002362\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002362","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核微反应堆(NMRs)是一种新兴的能源创新,旨在实现小规模和可运输的能源生产。核磁共振成像的长期发展不仅要考虑技术功能,还要考虑社会接受度。根据技术评估的原则,本研究主张在核微反应堆的新产品开发(NPD)的前端包括公民调查研究,因为商业上可行的核磁共振版本仍然是“地平线上”和多年以后的事情。通过离散选择方法(如本研究中使用的方法)收集的公民意见可以揭示公民成本、安全、就业、废物处理和环境影响之间的权衡如何影响公众对核磁共振的支持。这种对公民偏好的了解可以有力地告知nmr等技术的开发人员如何对这些新技术进行更改,使nmr与公民偏好保持一致,从而提高nmr的社会可接受性。在目前的研究中,怀俄明州和阿拉斯加州的公民最重视NMRs,因为它可以减少他们的电费账单,并最大限度地减少核废料的储存和运输。研究人员利用研究中使用的维度的重要性权重,通过聚类分析得出了四类公民:1)怀疑论者,2)核支持者,3)关注核废料,4)关注就业。对于政策制定者来说,分割分析的结果表明,在发展过程中支持核磁共振的人占样本的53%,而反对或关注核废料及其运输的人占47%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gauging citizen preferences for the emerging energy-technology of nuclear microreactors
Nuclear microreactors (NMRs) are an emerging energy innovation designed for small-scale and transportable energy production. The long-range development of NMRs must account not only for technical functionality but also for social acceptance. Drawing on principles from technology assessment, this study advocates for including citizen survey research in the front end of new-product development (NPD) for nuclear microreactors when fielding a commercially viable version of an NMR remains “over the horizon” and years away. Citizen input gathered through discrete-choice methods, such as those used in this study, can reveal how trade-offs in cost to citizens, safety, employment, waste handling, and environmental impacts influence public support for NMRs. Such knowledge of citizen preferences can powerfully inform developers of technologies, such as NMRs, on how to make changes in these new technologies so that NMRs align with citizen preferences and thereby increase the social acceptability of NMRs. In the current study, citizens in Wyoming and Alaska gave the most importance to NMRs that can reduce their electric utility bills and minimize the storage and transportation of nuclear waste. Researchers used the importance weights for the dimensions used in the study to derive four segments of citizens using clustering analysis: 1) skeptics, 2) nuclear supporters, 3) nuclear waste concerned, and 4) jobs-focused. For policymakers, the results of the segmentation analysis suggest that those supporting NMRs in the development process account for 53 percent of the sample, while those opposed to or concerned about nuclear waste and its transportation account for 47 percent—comparable percentages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信