半干旱牧场自由放养、泌乳肉牛的觅食行为与饲料质量和体重增加的关系

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
David J. Augustine , Monte J. Reed , Sean P. Kearney , Lauren M. Porensky , J. Derek Scasta , David W. Pellatz , Justin D. Derner
{"title":"半干旱牧场自由放养、泌乳肉牛的觅食行为与饲料质量和体重增加的关系","authors":"David J. Augustine ,&nbsp;Monte J. Reed ,&nbsp;Sean P. Kearney ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Porensky ,&nbsp;J. Derek Scasta ,&nbsp;David W. Pellatz ,&nbsp;Justin D. Derner","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring free-ranging livestock foraging behaviour and health with on-animal sensors has emerged as a potential means to enhance adaptive management for ranching operations. We evaluated the use of GPS collars collecting animal locations at 5-min intervals and estimating activity (grazing, walking, or stationary) via a 3-axis accelerometer to quantify foraging behaviour of lactating <em>Bos taurus</em> beef cows with calves on a ∼7600 ha working ranch in a sagebrush grassland ecotone in northeast Wyoming. We used this sensor data to quantify five metrics of foraging behaviour at a daily time step including (1) mean velocity while grazing (VG), (2) mean grazing bout duration (GBD), (3) mean turn angle while grazing (TAG), (4) total daily grazing time (TTG) and (5) total daily travel distance (TD), and related these metrics to measurements of cattle diet quality, weight gain, and stock density. While foraging behaviour metrics varied among individual cows, we found that daily estimates of VG, GBD, TAG and TD were all significantly related to stock density and variation in remotely-sensed estimates of dietary crude protein content. Over longer time periods of weeks to months, cattle diet quality and weight gain were significantly related to VG (positive correlation; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.42 – 0.87), and GBD (negative correlation; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58 – 0.78). These findings indicate that ranchers have the ability to influence diet quality and animal performance via (1) the rotation of herds among pastures of varying composition and quality, and (2) changes in herd size relative to pasture size (i.e., animal density). Furthermore, our results indicate there is substantial potential utility for near-real-time monitoring of foraging behaviour as an indicator of animal performance via the combination of GPS tracking, accelerometer data, and a method to wirelessly transmit data to the internet. However, operationalizing such a system will likely depend on continuing improvements in sensor durability and data management efficiency, and reductions in sensor and data transmission costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking foraging behaviour of free-ranging, lactating beef cows with diet quality and weight gain in semi-arid rangeland\",\"authors\":\"David J. Augustine ,&nbsp;Monte J. Reed ,&nbsp;Sean P. Kearney ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Porensky ,&nbsp;J. Derek Scasta ,&nbsp;David W. Pellatz ,&nbsp;Justin D. Derner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Monitoring free-ranging livestock foraging behaviour and health with on-animal sensors has emerged as a potential means to enhance adaptive management for ranching operations. We evaluated the use of GPS collars collecting animal locations at 5-min intervals and estimating activity (grazing, walking, or stationary) via a 3-axis accelerometer to quantify foraging behaviour of lactating <em>Bos taurus</em> beef cows with calves on a ∼7600 ha working ranch in a sagebrush grassland ecotone in northeast Wyoming. We used this sensor data to quantify five metrics of foraging behaviour at a daily time step including (1) mean velocity while grazing (VG), (2) mean grazing bout duration (GBD), (3) mean turn angle while grazing (TAG), (4) total daily grazing time (TTG) and (5) total daily travel distance (TD), and related these metrics to measurements of cattle diet quality, weight gain, and stock density. While foraging behaviour metrics varied among individual cows, we found that daily estimates of VG, GBD, TAG and TD were all significantly related to stock density and variation in remotely-sensed estimates of dietary crude protein content. Over longer time periods of weeks to months, cattle diet quality and weight gain were significantly related to VG (positive correlation; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.42 – 0.87), and GBD (negative correlation; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58 – 0.78). These findings indicate that ranchers have the ability to influence diet quality and animal performance via (1) the rotation of herds among pastures of varying composition and quality, and (2) changes in herd size relative to pasture size (i.e., animal density). Furthermore, our results indicate there is substantial potential utility for near-real-time monitoring of foraging behaviour as an indicator of animal performance via the combination of GPS tracking, accelerometer data, and a method to wirelessly transmit data to the internet. However, operationalizing such a system will likely depend on continuing improvements in sensor durability and data management efficiency, and reductions in sensor and data transmission costs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"292 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125003004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125003004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用非动物传感器监测自由放养牲畜的觅食行为和健康,已成为加强牧场经营适应性管理的一种潜在手段。我们评估了在怀俄明州东北部一个海拔约7600 公顷的山艾草草原过渡带工作牧场上,使用GPS颈圈每隔5分钟收集动物位置,并通过3轴加速度计估计活动(放牧、行走或静止)来量化育有小牛的泌乳期牛牛的觅食行为。我们利用这些传感器数据量化了5个每日时间步长的觅食行为指标,包括(1)平均放牧速度(VG)、(2)平均放牧持续时间(GBD)、(3)平均放牧转角(TAG)、(4)总日放牧时间(TTG)和(5)总日行程距离(TD),并将这些指标与牛的日粮质量、增重和种群密度测量相关联。尽管个体奶牛的觅食行为指标各不相同,但我们发现每日的VG、GBD、TAG和TD估计值都与种群密度和饲粮粗蛋白质含量遥感估计值的变化显著相关。在较长时间内(周~月),牛的日粮质量和增重与VG(正相关,R2 = 0.42 ~ 0.87)和GBD(负相关,R2 = 0.58 ~ 0.78)显著相关。这些结果表明,牧场主有能力通过(1)在不同组成和质量的牧场之间轮换畜群,以及(2)相对于牧场规模的畜群规模变化(即动物密度)来影响饲粮质量和动物生产性能。此外,我们的研究结果表明,通过结合GPS跟踪、加速度计数据和一种将数据无线传输到互联网的方法,对觅食行为进行近实时监测,作为动物生产性能的指标,具有巨大的潜在效用。然而,这种系统的操作可能取决于传感器耐用性和数据管理效率的持续改进,以及传感器和数据传输成本的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linking foraging behaviour of free-ranging, lactating beef cows with diet quality and weight gain in semi-arid rangeland
Monitoring free-ranging livestock foraging behaviour and health with on-animal sensors has emerged as a potential means to enhance adaptive management for ranching operations. We evaluated the use of GPS collars collecting animal locations at 5-min intervals and estimating activity (grazing, walking, or stationary) via a 3-axis accelerometer to quantify foraging behaviour of lactating Bos taurus beef cows with calves on a ∼7600 ha working ranch in a sagebrush grassland ecotone in northeast Wyoming. We used this sensor data to quantify five metrics of foraging behaviour at a daily time step including (1) mean velocity while grazing (VG), (2) mean grazing bout duration (GBD), (3) mean turn angle while grazing (TAG), (4) total daily grazing time (TTG) and (5) total daily travel distance (TD), and related these metrics to measurements of cattle diet quality, weight gain, and stock density. While foraging behaviour metrics varied among individual cows, we found that daily estimates of VG, GBD, TAG and TD were all significantly related to stock density and variation in remotely-sensed estimates of dietary crude protein content. Over longer time periods of weeks to months, cattle diet quality and weight gain were significantly related to VG (positive correlation; R2 = 0.42 – 0.87), and GBD (negative correlation; R2 = 0.58 – 0.78). These findings indicate that ranchers have the ability to influence diet quality and animal performance via (1) the rotation of herds among pastures of varying composition and quality, and (2) changes in herd size relative to pasture size (i.e., animal density). Furthermore, our results indicate there is substantial potential utility for near-real-time monitoring of foraging behaviour as an indicator of animal performance via the combination of GPS tracking, accelerometer data, and a method to wirelessly transmit data to the internet. However, operationalizing such a system will likely depend on continuing improvements in sensor durability and data management efficiency, and reductions in sensor and data transmission costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信