Yanbing Fang, Yonghua Su, Jingxuan Zhang, Kun Feng, Chuan He
{"title":"考虑性能函数性质的隧道可靠性问题的有效概率方法","authors":"Yanbing Fang, Yonghua Su, Jingxuan Zhang, Kun Feng, Chuan He","doi":"10.1002/nag.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advancement of reliability‐based design in tunnelling engineering, tunnel reliability analysis is becoming increasingly important. The performance function is the cornerstone and pivotal element in reliability analysis. However, they are found to be predominantly cumbersome, implicit, or derived from numerical simulations in tunnel reliability problems, thereby presenting significant challenges. Focusing on the direct approach to these performance functions, an efficient probabilistic method with a recursion procedure based on a revised Hasofer–Lind–Rackwits–Fiessler (HLRF)‐Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shan (BFGS) algorithm and the finite difference method (FDM) is proposed, considering properties of performance functions in tunnel reliability problems and convergence problems of the direct approach itself. Numerical performance functions with diverse degrees of nonlinearity are presented and validated, and it is suggested that the value of the step length coefficient involved in the FDM should not exceed 0.2. Subsequently, tunnel reliability problems with different performance functions are illustrated and verified. For the first scenario involving a complicated power exponential function, the proposed approach could converge for some cases that the HLRF cannot, and the relative errors are less than 3.0% compared with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). For the second scenario concerning numerical simulations with a horseshoe‐shaped cross‐section, the required computational costs of the proposed approach could potentially be reduced by 50% compared to the HRLF method. For the third scenario involving the support capacity for tunnel reliability‐based design, the required computational costs of the proposed approach could be 72% less than those of some classical first‐order reliability methods, and the relative error is less than 0.5% compared with MCS.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Efficient Probabilistic Approach to Tunnel Reliability Problems Considering Properties of Performance Functions\",\"authors\":\"Yanbing Fang, Yonghua Su, Jingxuan Zhang, Kun Feng, Chuan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nag.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advancement of reliability‐based design in tunnelling engineering, tunnel reliability analysis is becoming increasingly important. The performance function is the cornerstone and pivotal element in reliability analysis. However, they are found to be predominantly cumbersome, implicit, or derived from numerical simulations in tunnel reliability problems, thereby presenting significant challenges. Focusing on the direct approach to these performance functions, an efficient probabilistic method with a recursion procedure based on a revised Hasofer–Lind–Rackwits–Fiessler (HLRF)‐Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shan (BFGS) algorithm and the finite difference method (FDM) is proposed, considering properties of performance functions in tunnel reliability problems and convergence problems of the direct approach itself. Numerical performance functions with diverse degrees of nonlinearity are presented and validated, and it is suggested that the value of the step length coefficient involved in the FDM should not exceed 0.2. Subsequently, tunnel reliability problems with different performance functions are illustrated and verified. For the first scenario involving a complicated power exponential function, the proposed approach could converge for some cases that the HLRF cannot, and the relative errors are less than 3.0% compared with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). For the second scenario concerning numerical simulations with a horseshoe‐shaped cross‐section, the required computational costs of the proposed approach could potentially be reduced by 50% compared to the HRLF method. For the third scenario involving the support capacity for tunnel reliability‐based design, the required computational costs of the proposed approach could be 72% less than those of some classical first‐order reliability methods, and the relative error is less than 0.5% compared with MCS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Efficient Probabilistic Approach to Tunnel Reliability Problems Considering Properties of Performance Functions
With the advancement of reliability‐based design in tunnelling engineering, tunnel reliability analysis is becoming increasingly important. The performance function is the cornerstone and pivotal element in reliability analysis. However, they are found to be predominantly cumbersome, implicit, or derived from numerical simulations in tunnel reliability problems, thereby presenting significant challenges. Focusing on the direct approach to these performance functions, an efficient probabilistic method with a recursion procedure based on a revised Hasofer–Lind–Rackwits–Fiessler (HLRF)‐Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shan (BFGS) algorithm and the finite difference method (FDM) is proposed, considering properties of performance functions in tunnel reliability problems and convergence problems of the direct approach itself. Numerical performance functions with diverse degrees of nonlinearity are presented and validated, and it is suggested that the value of the step length coefficient involved in the FDM should not exceed 0.2. Subsequently, tunnel reliability problems with different performance functions are illustrated and verified. For the first scenario involving a complicated power exponential function, the proposed approach could converge for some cases that the HLRF cannot, and the relative errors are less than 3.0% compared with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). For the second scenario concerning numerical simulations with a horseshoe‐shaped cross‐section, the required computational costs of the proposed approach could potentially be reduced by 50% compared to the HRLF method. For the third scenario involving the support capacity for tunnel reliability‐based design, the required computational costs of the proposed approach could be 72% less than those of some classical first‐order reliability methods, and the relative error is less than 0.5% compared with MCS.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.