{"title":"页岩油层水基介质吸吸和CO2驱油协同提高采收率机理","authors":"Anlun Wang, Jianguang Wei, Rui Wang, Ying Yang, Xiaofeng Zhou, Dong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/nag.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both surfactant solution imbibition and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding are widely applied oil recovery techniques in shale oil reservoirs. However, the synergistic oil recovery effect of water‐based medium imbibition and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding for shale oil reservoirs is rarely explored, and the mechanisms of synergistic enhanced oil recovery by water‐based medium imbibition and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding are still not clear. In this paper, core flooding experiments combined with NMR tests are conducted to explore the synergy between slick water imbibition and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding in enhancing shale oil recovery and the governing mechanisms. The results show that (a) the average oil recovery rate of slick water imbibition is 38.86%, and after subsequent CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding, the oil recovery rate is further increased by 21.93%. (b) Compared with slick water imbibition combined with subsequent slick water flooding, slick water imbibition combined with subsequent CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding can improve the total oil recovery rate by about 10%. (c) During slick water imbibition combined with subsequent CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding, slick water primarily mobilizes oil from clay interlayer pores (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> < 10 nm), whereas CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> preferentially displaces oil trapped in pores with radii >10 nm, and the large pore (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 150 nm) oil recovery rate can reach almost 100% when the miscibility is obtained. (d) During subsequent flooding, compared with slick water, CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> can improve oil recovery rates in pores with radii >10 nm by more than 10%. Additionally, it enhances imbibition recovery of slick water by improving the hydrophilicity of shale core samples.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms of Synergistically Enhanced Oil Recovery by Water‐Based Medium Imbibition and CO2 Flooding in Shale Oil Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Anlun Wang, Jianguang Wei, Rui Wang, Ying Yang, Xiaofeng Zhou, Dong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nag.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both surfactant solution imbibition and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding are widely applied oil recovery techniques in shale oil reservoirs. However, the synergistic oil recovery effect of water‐based medium imbibition and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding for shale oil reservoirs is rarely explored, and the mechanisms of synergistic enhanced oil recovery by water‐based medium imbibition and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding are still not clear. In this paper, core flooding experiments combined with NMR tests are conducted to explore the synergy between slick water imbibition and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding in enhancing shale oil recovery and the governing mechanisms. The results show that (a) the average oil recovery rate of slick water imbibition is 38.86%, and after subsequent CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding, the oil recovery rate is further increased by 21.93%. (b) Compared with slick water imbibition combined with subsequent slick water flooding, slick water imbibition combined with subsequent CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding can improve the total oil recovery rate by about 10%. (c) During slick water imbibition combined with subsequent CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flooding, slick water primarily mobilizes oil from clay interlayer pores (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> < 10 nm), whereas CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> preferentially displaces oil trapped in pores with radii >10 nm, and the large pore (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 150 nm) oil recovery rate can reach almost 100% when the miscibility is obtained. (d) During subsequent flooding, compared with slick water, CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> can improve oil recovery rates in pores with radii >10 nm by more than 10%. Additionally, it enhances imbibition recovery of slick water by improving the hydrophilicity of shale core samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70061\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mechanisms of Synergistically Enhanced Oil Recovery by Water‐Based Medium Imbibition and CO2 Flooding in Shale Oil Reservoirs
Both surfactant solution imbibition and CO2 flooding are widely applied oil recovery techniques in shale oil reservoirs. However, the synergistic oil recovery effect of water‐based medium imbibition and CO2 flooding for shale oil reservoirs is rarely explored, and the mechanisms of synergistic enhanced oil recovery by water‐based medium imbibition and CO2 flooding are still not clear. In this paper, core flooding experiments combined with NMR tests are conducted to explore the synergy between slick water imbibition and CO2 flooding in enhancing shale oil recovery and the governing mechanisms. The results show that (a) the average oil recovery rate of slick water imbibition is 38.86%, and after subsequent CO2 flooding, the oil recovery rate is further increased by 21.93%. (b) Compared with slick water imbibition combined with subsequent slick water flooding, slick water imbibition combined with subsequent CO2 flooding can improve the total oil recovery rate by about 10%. (c) During slick water imbibition combined with subsequent CO2 flooding, slick water primarily mobilizes oil from clay interlayer pores (r < 10 nm), whereas CO2 preferentially displaces oil trapped in pores with radii >10 nm, and the large pore (r > 150 nm) oil recovery rate can reach almost 100% when the miscibility is obtained. (d) During subsequent flooding, compared with slick water, CO2 can improve oil recovery rates in pores with radii >10 nm by more than 10%. Additionally, it enhances imbibition recovery of slick water by improving the hydrophilicity of shale core samples.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.