Banff髌骨不稳定仪2.0患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值的估计。

IF 5
Per Arne Skarstein Waaler, Eivind Inderhaug, Thomas Birkenes, Asle Birkeland Kjellsen, Trine Hysing-Dahl
{"title":"Banff髌骨不稳定仪2.0患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值的估计。","authors":"Per Arne Skarstein Waaler, Eivind Inderhaug, Thomas Birkenes, Asle Birkeland Kjellsen, Trine Hysing-Dahl","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is a paucity of studies reporting patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for patient reported outcome measures validated for patellar instability. The aim of this study was to determine the PASS threshold for the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII) following surgery for recurrent patellar instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent patellar stabilisation surgery between 2013 and 2022 were included if they were ≥16 years of age and had ≥12 months of follow-up. The participants completed the BPII and a dichotomous PASS anchor question. The PASS threshold was then calculated using both the adjusted predictive modelling method and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete data were available for 218 knees of 182 patients, with a median follow-up time of 46 months. The PASS threshold was 62.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.8-65.9) using the adjusted predictive modelling method, and 66.3 (95% CI: 58.1-80.0) using ROC analysis. Overall, 173 patients (79.4%) reported satisfactory symptom states, while 72.9% and 70.6% achieved the respective PASS thresholds. The adjusted predictive modelling method yielded narrower 95% confidence intervals with minimal threshold variation across different approaches for handling bilateral cases compared to ROC analysis (1.3 vs. 8.1 points).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PASS threshold for BPII after patellar stabilisation surgery was 62.4 (out of 100 points). The adjusted predictive modelling method demonstrated superior precision and robustness in the PASS threshold calculation compared with the ROC analysis. This threshold provides a disease-specific reference for clinical decision making and research in patellofemoral instability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold for the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0.\",\"authors\":\"Per Arne Skarstein Waaler, Eivind Inderhaug, Thomas Birkenes, Asle Birkeland Kjellsen, Trine Hysing-Dahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is a paucity of studies reporting patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for patient reported outcome measures validated for patellar instability. The aim of this study was to determine the PASS threshold for the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII) following surgery for recurrent patellar instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent patellar stabilisation surgery between 2013 and 2022 were included if they were ≥16 years of age and had ≥12 months of follow-up. The participants completed the BPII and a dichotomous PASS anchor question. The PASS threshold was then calculated using both the adjusted predictive modelling method and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete data were available for 218 knees of 182 patients, with a median follow-up time of 46 months. The PASS threshold was 62.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.8-65.9) using the adjusted predictive modelling method, and 66.3 (95% CI: 58.1-80.0) using ROC analysis. Overall, 173 patients (79.4%) reported satisfactory symptom states, while 72.9% and 70.6% achieved the respective PASS thresholds. The adjusted predictive modelling method yielded narrower 95% confidence intervals with minimal threshold variation across different approaches for handling bilateral cases compared to ROC analysis (1.3 vs. 8.1 points).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PASS threshold for BPII after patellar stabilisation surgery was 62.4 (out of 100 points). The adjusted predictive modelling method demonstrated superior precision and robustness in the PASS threshold calculation compared with the ROC analysis. This threshold provides a disease-specific reference for clinical decision making and research in patellofemoral instability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:很少有研究报道患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值用于患者报告的髌骨不稳结果测量。本研究的目的是确定复发性髌骨不稳手术后Banff髌骨不稳仪2.0 (BPII)的PASS阈值。方法:纳入2013年至2022年间接受髌骨稳定手术的患者,年龄≥16岁,随访≥12个月。参与者完成了BPII和一个二分PASS锚题。然后使用调整后的预测建模方法和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析计算PASS阈值。结果:182例患者218个膝关节获得完整数据,中位随访时间为46个月。采用调整后的预测建模方法,PASS阈值为62.4(95%置信区间[CI]: 58.8-65.9),采用ROC分析,PASS阈值为66.3 (95% CI: 58.1-80.0)。总体而言,173名患者(79.4%)报告症状状态满意,而72.9%和70.6%分别达到了PASS阈值。与ROC分析相比,调整后的预测建模方法在处理双侧病例的不同方法中产生了更窄的95%置信区间和最小的阈值变化(1.3对8.1分)。结论:髌骨稳定手术后BPII的PASS阈值为62.4(满分100分)。与ROC分析相比,调整后的预测建模方法在PASS阈值计算中显示出更高的精度和稳健性。该阈值为临床决策和髌股不稳定的研究提供了疾病特异性参考。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold for the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0.

Purpose: There is a paucity of studies reporting patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for patient reported outcome measures validated for patellar instability. The aim of this study was to determine the PASS threshold for the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII) following surgery for recurrent patellar instability.

Methods: Patients who underwent patellar stabilisation surgery between 2013 and 2022 were included if they were ≥16 years of age and had ≥12 months of follow-up. The participants completed the BPII and a dichotomous PASS anchor question. The PASS threshold was then calculated using both the adjusted predictive modelling method and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: Complete data were available for 218 knees of 182 patients, with a median follow-up time of 46 months. The PASS threshold was 62.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.8-65.9) using the adjusted predictive modelling method, and 66.3 (95% CI: 58.1-80.0) using ROC analysis. Overall, 173 patients (79.4%) reported satisfactory symptom states, while 72.9% and 70.6% achieved the respective PASS thresholds. The adjusted predictive modelling method yielded narrower 95% confidence intervals with minimal threshold variation across different approaches for handling bilateral cases compared to ROC analysis (1.3 vs. 8.1 points).

Conclusion: The PASS threshold for BPII after patellar stabilisation surgery was 62.4 (out of 100 points). The adjusted predictive modelling method demonstrated superior precision and robustness in the PASS threshold calculation compared with the ROC analysis. This threshold provides a disease-specific reference for clinical decision making and research in patellofemoral instability.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信