美国临床医生隐性种族偏见与避孕咨询。

Kathleen M Morrell, Jessica L Rosenblum, Sophia Joslin-Roher, Howard Minkoff
{"title":"美国临床医生隐性种族偏见与避孕咨询。","authors":"Kathleen M Morrell, Jessica L Rosenblum, Sophia Joslin-Roher, Howard Minkoff","doi":"10.1177/15409996251360908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Unequal treatment of patients based on race or ethnicity still exists in reproductive health. One possible reason is clinician bias. While explicit bias has been studied in relation to contraception, the influence of a clinician's implicit bias on contraceptive recommendations has not been examined. We sought to assess the degree of implicit racial bias among reproductive health clinicians and to determine whether bias correlates with recommendations for contraception. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Clinicians were approached in-person at multiple hospitals in New York City and one national conference over a 7-month period. The computer-based study included a demographic survey, clinical vignettes about contraception, and a racial Implicit Association Test. The clinical vignettes were randomized 1:1 to describe either all white patients or all Black patients for each provider. We assessed the likelihood that patient race would factor into contraceptive counseling, looking separately at white and Black clinicians. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 500 clinicians invited to participate, 426 completed the survey and were analyzed. They were mostly non-Hispanic, white female attending physicians working in urban areas. White clinicians showed a pro-white bias (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while Black clinicians did not show racial bias in either direction (<i>p</i> = 0.637). White clinicians with pro-white bias were significantly more likely to recommend sterilization to Black patients than to white patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Implicit racial bias differed based on clinician race, and contraceptive recommendations differed based on their level of bias. It is important for all reproductive health professionals to understand their own implicit bias and how it may affect their contraceptive counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Implicit Racial Bias and Contraceptive Counseling in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen M Morrell, Jessica L Rosenblum, Sophia Joslin-Roher, Howard Minkoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15409996251360908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Unequal treatment of patients based on race or ethnicity still exists in reproductive health. One possible reason is clinician bias. While explicit bias has been studied in relation to contraception, the influence of a clinician's implicit bias on contraceptive recommendations has not been examined. We sought to assess the degree of implicit racial bias among reproductive health clinicians and to determine whether bias correlates with recommendations for contraception. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Clinicians were approached in-person at multiple hospitals in New York City and one national conference over a 7-month period. The computer-based study included a demographic survey, clinical vignettes about contraception, and a racial Implicit Association Test. The clinical vignettes were randomized 1:1 to describe either all white patients or all Black patients for each provider. We assessed the likelihood that patient race would factor into contraceptive counseling, looking separately at white and Black clinicians. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 500 clinicians invited to participate, 426 completed the survey and were analyzed. They were mostly non-Hispanic, white female attending physicians working in urban areas. White clinicians showed a pro-white bias (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while Black clinicians did not show racial bias in either direction (<i>p</i> = 0.637). White clinicians with pro-white bias were significantly more likely to recommend sterilization to Black patients than to white patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Implicit racial bias differed based on clinician race, and contraceptive recommendations differed based on their level of bias. It is important for all reproductive health professionals to understand their own implicit bias and how it may affect their contraceptive counseling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251360908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251360908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在生殖健康领域仍然存在基于种族或民族的患者不平等待遇。一个可能的原因是临床医生的偏见。虽然已经研究了与避孕有关的显性偏见,但尚未研究临床医生的隐性偏见对避孕建议的影响。我们试图评估生殖健康临床医生中隐性种族偏见的程度,并确定偏见是否与避孕建议相关。方法:在为期7个月的时间里,在纽约市的多家医院和一次全国会议上与临床医生进行了面对面的接触。这项以计算机为基础的研究包括人口统计调查、关于避孕的临床小品和种族内隐联想测试。临床小插曲按1:1随机分配,描述每个提供者的所有白人患者或所有黑人患者。我们评估了患者种族影响避孕咨询的可能性,分别观察了白人和黑人临床医生。结果:500名临床医生受邀参与,其中426人完成调查并进行分析。他们大多是非西班牙裔的白人女性主治医生,在城市地区工作。白人临床医生表现出支持白人的偏见(p < 0.001),而黑人临床医生在任何方向上都没有表现出种族偏见(p = 0.637)。倾向于白人的白人临床医生比白人患者更倾向于推荐黑人患者绝育。结论:隐性种族偏见因临床医生的种族而异,避孕建议因其偏见水平而异。对于所有生殖健康专业人员来说,了解他们自己的隐性偏见以及它如何影响他们的避孕咨询是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician Implicit Racial Bias and Contraceptive Counseling in the United States.

Objective: Unequal treatment of patients based on race or ethnicity still exists in reproductive health. One possible reason is clinician bias. While explicit bias has been studied in relation to contraception, the influence of a clinician's implicit bias on contraceptive recommendations has not been examined. We sought to assess the degree of implicit racial bias among reproductive health clinicians and to determine whether bias correlates with recommendations for contraception. Methods: Clinicians were approached in-person at multiple hospitals in New York City and one national conference over a 7-month period. The computer-based study included a demographic survey, clinical vignettes about contraception, and a racial Implicit Association Test. The clinical vignettes were randomized 1:1 to describe either all white patients or all Black patients for each provider. We assessed the likelihood that patient race would factor into contraceptive counseling, looking separately at white and Black clinicians. Results: Of 500 clinicians invited to participate, 426 completed the survey and were analyzed. They were mostly non-Hispanic, white female attending physicians working in urban areas. White clinicians showed a pro-white bias (p < 0.001), while Black clinicians did not show racial bias in either direction (p = 0.637). White clinicians with pro-white bias were significantly more likely to recommend sterilization to Black patients than to white patients. Conclusions: Implicit racial bias differed based on clinician race, and contraceptive recommendations differed based on their level of bias. It is important for all reproductive health professionals to understand their own implicit bias and how it may affect their contraceptive counseling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信