生物活性玻璃治疗良性骨肿瘤64例临床及影像学结果回顾性分析。

IF 1
Sevan Sivacioglu, Melih Civan, Onur Cetin, Şafak Sayar, Ahmet Salduz, Levent Eralp
{"title":"生物活性玻璃治疗良性骨肿瘤64例临床及影像学结果回顾性分析。","authors":"Sevan Sivacioglu, Melih Civan, Onur Cetin, Şafak Sayar, Ahmet Salduz, Levent Eralp","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.89507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benign and benign-aggressive bone tumors, though non-metastatic, may require surgical intervention due to pain, fracture risk, or functional impairment. In many cases, bone grafting may be required in benign or benign-aggressive bone tumors. Although autografts remain the gold standard, they present disadvantages, especially in pediatric patients. Synthetic alternatives such as bioactive glass (BG) have emerged as viable options. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of BG in the treatment of benign bone tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study evaluated 64 patients (71 procedures) treated with curettage and BG grafting for benign bone tumors between 2004 and 2023. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, and radiological healing was evaluated using the Neer classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 25.0+-12.6 months. Significant improvement was observed in MSTS scores (from 17.6+-4.8 to 28.1+-2.0; p<0.05). Neer classification indicated high union rates. Complications included tumor recurrence in four patients (five procedures), fractures in nine patients, and superficial infections in four patients. No deep infections or any other material-related adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bioactive glass is a safe and effective bone substitute for managing benign bone defects, especially in pediatric populations where autograft options are limited. Its osteoconductive durability, infection resistance, and compatibility with bone remodeling make it a strong alternative to traditional grafting techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 9","pages":"920-924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and radiological outcomes of bioactive glass in the treatment of benign bone tumors: a retrospective study of 64 cases.\",\"authors\":\"Sevan Sivacioglu, Melih Civan, Onur Cetin, Şafak Sayar, Ahmet Salduz, Levent Eralp\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/tjtes.2025.89507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benign and benign-aggressive bone tumors, though non-metastatic, may require surgical intervention due to pain, fracture risk, or functional impairment. In many cases, bone grafting may be required in benign or benign-aggressive bone tumors. Although autografts remain the gold standard, they present disadvantages, especially in pediatric patients. Synthetic alternatives such as bioactive glass (BG) have emerged as viable options. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of BG in the treatment of benign bone tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study evaluated 64 patients (71 procedures) treated with curettage and BG grafting for benign bone tumors between 2004 and 2023. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, and radiological healing was evaluated using the Neer classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 25.0+-12.6 months. Significant improvement was observed in MSTS scores (from 17.6+-4.8 to 28.1+-2.0; p<0.05). Neer classification indicated high union rates. Complications included tumor recurrence in four patients (five procedures), fractures in nine patients, and superficial infections in four patients. No deep infections or any other material-related adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bioactive glass is a safe and effective bone substitute for managing benign bone defects, especially in pediatric populations where autograft options are limited. Its osteoconductive durability, infection resistance, and compatibility with bone remodeling make it a strong alternative to traditional grafting techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"920-924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460632/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.89507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.89507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:良性和良性侵袭性骨肿瘤虽然没有转移,但由于疼痛、骨折风险或功能损害可能需要手术干预。在许多情况下,骨移植可能需要在良性或良性侵袭性骨肿瘤。虽然自体移植物仍然是金标准,但它们存在缺点,特别是在儿科患者中。生物活性玻璃(BG)等合成替代品已成为可行的选择。本研究旨在评价BG治疗良性骨肿瘤的临床和影像学结果。方法:本回顾性单中心研究评估了2004年至2023年间64例(71种手术)行刮除和BG移植治疗的良性骨肿瘤。使用肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会(MSTS)评分评估功能结果,使用Neer分类评估放射学愈合。结果:平均随访25.0+-12.6个月。MSTS评分显著提高(从17.6+-4.8到28.1+-2.0)。结论:生物活性玻璃是一种安全有效的骨替代物,用于治疗良性骨缺损,特别是在自体移植物选择有限的儿童人群中。它的骨传导耐久性、抗感染性和与骨重塑的相容性使其成为传统移植技术的强大替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and radiological outcomes of bioactive glass in the treatment of benign bone tumors: a retrospective study of 64 cases.

Background: Benign and benign-aggressive bone tumors, though non-metastatic, may require surgical intervention due to pain, fracture risk, or functional impairment. In many cases, bone grafting may be required in benign or benign-aggressive bone tumors. Although autografts remain the gold standard, they present disadvantages, especially in pediatric patients. Synthetic alternatives such as bioactive glass (BG) have emerged as viable options. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of BG in the treatment of benign bone tumors.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study evaluated 64 patients (71 procedures) treated with curettage and BG grafting for benign bone tumors between 2004 and 2023. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, and radiological healing was evaluated using the Neer classification.

Results: The mean follow-up was 25.0+-12.6 months. Significant improvement was observed in MSTS scores (from 17.6+-4.8 to 28.1+-2.0; p<0.05). Neer classification indicated high union rates. Complications included tumor recurrence in four patients (five procedures), fractures in nine patients, and superficial infections in four patients. No deep infections or any other material-related adverse effects were reported.

Conclusion: Bioactive glass is a safe and effective bone substitute for managing benign bone defects, especially in pediatric populations where autograft options are limited. Its osteoconductive durability, infection resistance, and compatibility with bone remodeling make it a strong alternative to traditional grafting techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信