残疾评分系统对手部和前臂损伤患者重返工作的预测价值。

IF 1
Nilay Cankurt Ayar, Mustafa Selçuk Ayar, Berna Aydin, Ahmet Turla
{"title":"残疾评分系统对手部和前臂损伤患者重返工作的预测价值。","authors":"Nilay Cankurt Ayar, Mustafa Selçuk Ayar, Berna Aydin, Ahmet Turla","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.61475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting return-to-work (RTW) outcomes following upper extremity trauma is crucial for optimizing patient care, guiding rehabilitation, and reducing the socioeconomic burden. Although several disability scoring systems have been proposed to assess injury severity, their ability to estimate RTW status and duration remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Modified Hand Injury Severity Score (MHISS), Upper Extremity Disability Rate (UEDR), and Total Body Disability Rate (TBDR) for RTW outcomes in patients with hand, wrist, and forearm injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 69 patients who presented to the Forensic Medicine Department of Ondokuz Mayıs University between 2020 and 2024. Eligible participants were adults with documented hand, wrist, or forearm injuries and complete treatment records, including MHISS scoring. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and disability rates (UEDR, TBDR) were collected. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and logistic regression to assess associations between scoring systems and RTW status and duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median MHISS score was 20.0, with corresponding UEDR and TBDR values of 3.0% and 2.0%, respectively. Occupational injuries, observed in 37.7% of cases, were associated with significantly higher disability scores (p<0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated strong predictive ability for MHISS (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.886), UEDR (AUC: 0.903), and TBDR (AUC: 0.897) in identifying RTW status. While MHISS effectively predicted RTW status, it did not correlate with RTW duration (p=0.082). In contrast, UEDR and TBDR showed weak but statistically significant correlations with RTW duration (r=0.295 and r=0.296, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression did not identify any independent predictors of RTW.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disability scoring systems such as MHISS, UEDR, and TBDR are useful tools for predicting whether patients will return to work following hand and forearm injuries. However, their ability to estimate the duration of work absence is limited. Future research should integrate psychosocial, occupational, and rehabilitation-related variables to develop more comprehensive models for RTW prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 9","pages":"900-906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of disability scoring systems for return-to-work outcomes in hand and forearm injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Nilay Cankurt Ayar, Mustafa Selçuk Ayar, Berna Aydin, Ahmet Turla\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/tjtes.2025.61475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting return-to-work (RTW) outcomes following upper extremity trauma is crucial for optimizing patient care, guiding rehabilitation, and reducing the socioeconomic burden. Although several disability scoring systems have been proposed to assess injury severity, their ability to estimate RTW status and duration remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Modified Hand Injury Severity Score (MHISS), Upper Extremity Disability Rate (UEDR), and Total Body Disability Rate (TBDR) for RTW outcomes in patients with hand, wrist, and forearm injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 69 patients who presented to the Forensic Medicine Department of Ondokuz Mayıs University between 2020 and 2024. Eligible participants were adults with documented hand, wrist, or forearm injuries and complete treatment records, including MHISS scoring. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and disability rates (UEDR, TBDR) were collected. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and logistic regression to assess associations between scoring systems and RTW status and duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median MHISS score was 20.0, with corresponding UEDR and TBDR values of 3.0% and 2.0%, respectively. Occupational injuries, observed in 37.7% of cases, were associated with significantly higher disability scores (p<0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated strong predictive ability for MHISS (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.886), UEDR (AUC: 0.903), and TBDR (AUC: 0.897) in identifying RTW status. While MHISS effectively predicted RTW status, it did not correlate with RTW duration (p=0.082). In contrast, UEDR and TBDR showed weak but statistically significant correlations with RTW duration (r=0.295 and r=0.296, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression did not identify any independent predictors of RTW.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disability scoring systems such as MHISS, UEDR, and TBDR are useful tools for predicting whether patients will return to work following hand and forearm injuries. However, their ability to estimate the duration of work absence is limited. Future research should integrate psychosocial, occupational, and rehabilitation-related variables to develop more comprehensive models for RTW prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"900-906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.61475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.61475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预测上肢创伤后重返工作岗位(RTW)的结果对于优化患者护理、指导康复和减轻社会经济负担至关重要。虽然已经提出了几种残疾评分系统来评估损伤的严重程度,但它们估计RTW状态和持续时间的能力仍未得到充分的研究。本研究旨在评估修正手部损伤严重程度评分(miss)、上肢残疾率(UEDR)和全身残疾率(TBDR)对手、腕和前臂损伤患者RTW结局的预测价值。方法:对2020年至2024年在Ondokuz Mayıs大学法医学部门就诊的69例患者进行回顾性横断面研究。符合条件的参与者是有手部、手腕或前臂损伤记录和完整治疗记录的成年人,包括miss评分。收集人口统计数据、损伤特征和致残率(UEDR、TBDR)。统计分析包括Spearman相关、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和logistic回归来评估评分系统与RTW状态和持续时间之间的关系。结果:miss评分中位数为20.0,相应的UEDR和TBDR分别为3.0%和2.0%。在37.7%的病例中,职业性损伤与较高的残疾评分相关(结论:miss、UEDR和TBDR等残疾评分系统是预测手部和前臂损伤后患者是否会重返工作岗位的有用工具。然而,他们估计缺勤时间的能力是有限的。未来的研究应整合社会心理、职业和康复相关的变量,以建立更全面的RTW预后模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictive value of disability scoring systems for return-to-work outcomes in hand and forearm injuries.

Predictive value of disability scoring systems for return-to-work outcomes in hand and forearm injuries.

Background: Predicting return-to-work (RTW) outcomes following upper extremity trauma is crucial for optimizing patient care, guiding rehabilitation, and reducing the socioeconomic burden. Although several disability scoring systems have been proposed to assess injury severity, their ability to estimate RTW status and duration remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Modified Hand Injury Severity Score (MHISS), Upper Extremity Disability Rate (UEDR), and Total Body Disability Rate (TBDR) for RTW outcomes in patients with hand, wrist, and forearm injuries.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 69 patients who presented to the Forensic Medicine Department of Ondokuz Mayıs University between 2020 and 2024. Eligible participants were adults with documented hand, wrist, or forearm injuries and complete treatment records, including MHISS scoring. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and disability rates (UEDR, TBDR) were collected. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and logistic regression to assess associations between scoring systems and RTW status and duration.

Results: The median MHISS score was 20.0, with corresponding UEDR and TBDR values of 3.0% and 2.0%, respectively. Occupational injuries, observed in 37.7% of cases, were associated with significantly higher disability scores (p<0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated strong predictive ability for MHISS (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.886), UEDR (AUC: 0.903), and TBDR (AUC: 0.897) in identifying RTW status. While MHISS effectively predicted RTW status, it did not correlate with RTW duration (p=0.082). In contrast, UEDR and TBDR showed weak but statistically significant correlations with RTW duration (r=0.295 and r=0.296, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression did not identify any independent predictors of RTW.

Conclusion: Disability scoring systems such as MHISS, UEDR, and TBDR are useful tools for predicting whether patients will return to work following hand and forearm injuries. However, their ability to estimate the duration of work absence is limited. Future research should integrate psychosocial, occupational, and rehabilitation-related variables to develop more comprehensive models for RTW prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信