实时肾内压监测的一次性输尿管镜与所有其他一次性输尿管镜术后感染对比。

IF 2.7
Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2025.2557403
Naeem Bhojani, Kathryn Morris, Jenifer White, Sirikan Rojanasarot, Emma D Tran, Manoj Monga
{"title":"实时肾内压监测的一次性输尿管镜与所有其他一次性输尿管镜术后感染对比。","authors":"Naeem Bhojani, Kathryn Morris, Jenifer White, Sirikan Rojanasarot, Emma D Tran, Manoj Monga","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2557403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence for LithoVue™ Elite Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope (LVE) with pressure monitoring vs. other single-use ureteroscopes is needed.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study using US electronic health records evaluated patients undergoing ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy between 1 January 2023 and 1 June 2025. The primary endpoint was post-operative infection, defined as urinary tract infection (UTI), sepsis, and other infections, assessed at 10- and 30-days post-index procedure. Propensity score matching controlled for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 208 patients with LVE with pressure monitoring (mean age 61.4; 48.1% female; 79.3% White) and 416 with other single-use ureteroscopes without pressure monitoring (mean age 61.8; 48.1% female; 78.1% White) were evaluated. Post-operative LVE with pressure monitoring infection was significantly lower at 30 days post-index (8.2% vs. 15.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.016). Multivariable analyses confirmed significantly higher odds of 30-day infection with other single-use ureteroscopes (odds ratio 2.09 [95% confidence interval 1.19-3.86]; <i>p</i> = 0.014). Post-operative sepsis and other infections did not statistically differ; however, post-operative 30-day UTI was significantly less with LVE with pressure monitoring (5.2% vs. 10.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LVE with pressure monitoring was associated with reduced 30-day post-URS infection. These findings support clinical improvement with LVE and suggest that intrarenal pressure monitoring may contribute to better short-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1135-1143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-operative infection with a single-use ureteroscope with real-time intrarenal pressure monitoring vs. all other single-use ureteroscopes.\",\"authors\":\"Naeem Bhojani, Kathryn Morris, Jenifer White, Sirikan Rojanasarot, Emma D Tran, Manoj Monga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2025.2557403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence for LithoVue™ Elite Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope (LVE) with pressure monitoring vs. other single-use ureteroscopes is needed.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study using US electronic health records evaluated patients undergoing ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy between 1 January 2023 and 1 June 2025. The primary endpoint was post-operative infection, defined as urinary tract infection (UTI), sepsis, and other infections, assessed at 10- and 30-days post-index procedure. Propensity score matching controlled for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 208 patients with LVE with pressure monitoring (mean age 61.4; 48.1% female; 79.3% White) and 416 with other single-use ureteroscopes without pressure monitoring (mean age 61.8; 48.1% female; 78.1% White) were evaluated. Post-operative LVE with pressure monitoring infection was significantly lower at 30 days post-index (8.2% vs. 15.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.016). Multivariable analyses confirmed significantly higher odds of 30-day infection with other single-use ureteroscopes (odds ratio 2.09 [95% confidence interval 1.19-3.86]; <i>p</i> = 0.014). Post-operative sepsis and other infections did not statistically differ; however, post-operative 30-day UTI was significantly less with LVE with pressure monitoring (5.2% vs. 10.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LVE with pressure monitoring was associated with reduced 30-day post-URS infection. These findings support clinical improvement with LVE and suggest that intrarenal pressure monitoring may contribute to better short-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1135-1143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2557403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2557403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有压力监测的LithoVue™Elite一次性数字柔性输尿管镜(LVE)与其他一次性输尿管镜的比较需要证据。研究设计和方法:本研究使用美国电子健康记录评估2023年1月1日至2025年6月1日期间接受输尿管镜(URS)激光碎石术的患者。主要终点是术后感染,定义为尿路感染、败血症和其他感染,在指数手术后10天和30天进行评估。倾向评分匹配控制基线差异。结果:匹配后,评估208例LVE伴压监测患者(平均年龄61.4岁,女性48.1%,白人85.1%)和416例其他一次性输尿管镜不伴压监测患者(平均年龄61.8岁,女性48.4%,白人85.1%)。术后有压力监测的LVE感染率明显低于术后30天(8.2% vs. 15.4%; p = 0.016)。多变量分析证实,使用其他单次输尿管镜30天感染的几率明显更高(优势比2.17[95%可信区间1.21-4.10];p = 0.012)。术后脓毒症及其他感染无统计学差异;然而,LVE合并压力监测术后30天UTI明显减少(5.2% vs. 10.8%; p = 0.033)。结论:LVE加压力监测可减少尿路感染后30天的感染。这些发现支持LVE相关的临床改善,并提示肾内压监测可能有助于改善短期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-operative infection with a single-use ureteroscope with real-time intrarenal pressure monitoring vs. all other single-use ureteroscopes.

Background: Evidence for LithoVue™ Elite Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope (LVE) with pressure monitoring vs. other single-use ureteroscopes is needed.

Research design and methods: This study using US electronic health records evaluated patients undergoing ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy between 1 January 2023 and 1 June 2025. The primary endpoint was post-operative infection, defined as urinary tract infection (UTI), sepsis, and other infections, assessed at 10- and 30-days post-index procedure. Propensity score matching controlled for baseline differences.

Results: After matching, 208 patients with LVE with pressure monitoring (mean age 61.4; 48.1% female; 79.3% White) and 416 with other single-use ureteroscopes without pressure monitoring (mean age 61.8; 48.1% female; 78.1% White) were evaluated. Post-operative LVE with pressure monitoring infection was significantly lower at 30 days post-index (8.2% vs. 15.4%; p = 0.016). Multivariable analyses confirmed significantly higher odds of 30-day infection with other single-use ureteroscopes (odds ratio 2.09 [95% confidence interval 1.19-3.86]; p = 0.014). Post-operative sepsis and other infections did not statistically differ; however, post-operative 30-day UTI was significantly less with LVE with pressure monitoring (5.2% vs. 10.8%; p = 0.033).

Conclusions: LVE with pressure monitoring was associated with reduced 30-day post-URS infection. These findings support clinical improvement with LVE and suggest that intrarenal pressure monitoring may contribute to better short-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信