大麻的使用特点和产品选择的原因在患者获得治疗的物质使用障碍:一项混合方法的研究。

Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26828/cannabis/2025/000309
Justin Matheson, Harseerat Saini, Rebecca Haines-Saah, Marcos Sanches, Matthew E Sloan, Adam Zaweel, Ahmed Hassan, Leslie Buckley, Amy Porathl, James MacKillop, Christian S Hendershot, Stefan Kloiber, Bernard Le Foll
{"title":"大麻的使用特点和产品选择的原因在患者获得治疗的物质使用障碍:一项混合方法的研究。","authors":"Justin Matheson, Harseerat Saini, Rebecca Haines-Saah, Marcos Sanches, Matthew E Sloan, Adam Zaweel, Ahmed Hassan, Leslie Buckley, Amy Porathl, James MacKillop, Christian S Hendershot, Stefan Kloiber, Bernard Le Foll","doi":"10.26828/cannabis/2025/000309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The diversity and potency of cannabis products have increased in recent years, underscoring the importance of understanding which products are being used and why. Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) use have a high prevalence of risky cannabis use, making it especially important to understand use patterns in this group. We aimed to first describe cannabis product characteristics and then explore reasons for choosing products in our sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this mixed-methods study, 472 adults who self-reported accessing SUD treatment and lifetime cannabis use completed an online survey. A subset of 22 participants completed in-depth interviews. Quantitative results focused on describing cannabis use characteristics (e.g., product types) among participants reporting past-year cannabis use (current use group) or lifetime cannabis use but no use in past year (past use group), while qualitative descriptive analysis was used to describe reasons for choosing products among participants who were currently using cannabis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across medical and non-medical use of cannabis, dried flower and smoked cannabis formulations were most used (e.g., 89% of the current use group reported smoking cannabis for non-medical purposes), followed by edibles (e.g., 53% of the current use group used edible formulations of cannabis for non-medical purposes), though there was considerable use of higher-potency products such as concentrates and dabs (e.g., 11% of the current use group had used dabs for non-medical purposes). Our qualitative analysis found that almost all participants were motivated by THC content when purchasing products, yet sometimes perceived medical benefits or harm reduction were reasons for using certain products (especially CBD-dominant products), while sometimes other factors (e.g., convenience, familiarity) were influential.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cannabis use characteristics (including motives for choosing products) are complex and nuanced in patients accessing SUD treatment. More work is needed to understand longitudinal relationships between use of different cannabis products and both harms and potential benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":72520,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","volume":"8 2","pages":"67-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabis Use Characteristics and Reasons for Product Choices Among Patients Accessing Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Matheson, Harseerat Saini, Rebecca Haines-Saah, Marcos Sanches, Matthew E Sloan, Adam Zaweel, Ahmed Hassan, Leslie Buckley, Amy Porathl, James MacKillop, Christian S Hendershot, Stefan Kloiber, Bernard Le Foll\",\"doi\":\"10.26828/cannabis/2025/000309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The diversity and potency of cannabis products have increased in recent years, underscoring the importance of understanding which products are being used and why. Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) use have a high prevalence of risky cannabis use, making it especially important to understand use patterns in this group. We aimed to first describe cannabis product characteristics and then explore reasons for choosing products in our sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this mixed-methods study, 472 adults who self-reported accessing SUD treatment and lifetime cannabis use completed an online survey. A subset of 22 participants completed in-depth interviews. Quantitative results focused on describing cannabis use characteristics (e.g., product types) among participants reporting past-year cannabis use (current use group) or lifetime cannabis use but no use in past year (past use group), while qualitative descriptive analysis was used to describe reasons for choosing products among participants who were currently using cannabis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across medical and non-medical use of cannabis, dried flower and smoked cannabis formulations were most used (e.g., 89% of the current use group reported smoking cannabis for non-medical purposes), followed by edibles (e.g., 53% of the current use group used edible formulations of cannabis for non-medical purposes), though there was considerable use of higher-potency products such as concentrates and dabs (e.g., 11% of the current use group had used dabs for non-medical purposes). Our qualitative analysis found that almost all participants were motivated by THC content when purchasing products, yet sometimes perceived medical benefits or harm reduction were reasons for using certain products (especially CBD-dominant products), while sometimes other factors (e.g., convenience, familiarity) were influential.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cannabis use characteristics (including motives for choosing products) are complex and nuanced in patients accessing SUD treatment. More work is needed to understand longitudinal relationships between use of different cannabis products and both harms and potential benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"67-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2025/000309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2025/000309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来,大麻产品的多样性和效力有所增加,强调了了解正在使用哪些产品及其原因的重要性。物质使用障碍(sud)患者使用大麻的风险很高,因此了解这一群体的使用模式尤为重要。我们的目的是首先描述大麻产品的特点,然后探讨在我们的样本中选择产品的原因。方法:在这项混合方法的研究中,472名自我报告接受过SUD治疗和终身使用大麻的成年人完成了一项在线调查。22名参与者完成了深度访谈。定量结果侧重于描述报告过去一年使用大麻(当前使用组)或终生使用大麻但过去一年未使用大麻(过去使用组)的参与者的大麻使用特征(例如,产品类型),而定性描述性分析用于描述目前使用大麻的参与者选择产品的原因。结果:在大麻的医疗和非医疗用途中,使用最多的是干花大麻和烟熏大麻制剂(例如,89%的当前使用组报告称非医疗目的吸食大麻),其次是食用大麻制剂(例如,53%的当前使用组将可食用大麻制剂用于非医疗目的),不过也有相当多的人使用浓缩物和小片等效力更高的产品(例如,11%的当前使用组将小片用于非医疗目的)。我们的定性分析发现,几乎所有参与者在购买产品时都受到四氢大麻酚含量的激励,但有时认为医疗效益或减少危害是使用某些产品(特别是cbd主导产品)的原因,而有时其他因素(例如,便利,熟悉程度)也有影响。结论:在接受SUD治疗的患者中,大麻使用特征(包括选择产品的动机)是复杂而微妙的。需要做更多的工作来了解使用不同大麻产品与危害和潜在益处之间的纵向关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cannabis Use Characteristics and Reasons for Product Choices Among Patients Accessing Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Objective: The diversity and potency of cannabis products have increased in recent years, underscoring the importance of understanding which products are being used and why. Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) use have a high prevalence of risky cannabis use, making it especially important to understand use patterns in this group. We aimed to first describe cannabis product characteristics and then explore reasons for choosing products in our sample.

Method: In this mixed-methods study, 472 adults who self-reported accessing SUD treatment and lifetime cannabis use completed an online survey. A subset of 22 participants completed in-depth interviews. Quantitative results focused on describing cannabis use characteristics (e.g., product types) among participants reporting past-year cannabis use (current use group) or lifetime cannabis use but no use in past year (past use group), while qualitative descriptive analysis was used to describe reasons for choosing products among participants who were currently using cannabis.

Results: Across medical and non-medical use of cannabis, dried flower and smoked cannabis formulations were most used (e.g., 89% of the current use group reported smoking cannabis for non-medical purposes), followed by edibles (e.g., 53% of the current use group used edible formulations of cannabis for non-medical purposes), though there was considerable use of higher-potency products such as concentrates and dabs (e.g., 11% of the current use group had used dabs for non-medical purposes). Our qualitative analysis found that almost all participants were motivated by THC content when purchasing products, yet sometimes perceived medical benefits or harm reduction were reasons for using certain products (especially CBD-dominant products), while sometimes other factors (e.g., convenience, familiarity) were influential.

Conclusions: Cannabis use characteristics (including motives for choosing products) are complex and nuanced in patients accessing SUD treatment. More work is needed to understand longitudinal relationships between use of different cannabis products and both harms and potential benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信