免疫相关不良事件对联合免疫检查点/酪氨酸激酶抑制治疗转移性肾癌的预后影响

IF 3.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Bunpei Isoda, Masanobu Shiga, Shuya Kandori, Shota Takahashi, Akifumi Omiya, Tomoki Ishida, Kotoe Matsuda, Hiromichi Sakurai, Bryan J Mathis, Ken Tanaka, Manabu Komine, Masahiro Iinuma, Akira Joraku, Hiromitsu Negoro, Masakazu Tsutsumi, Takamitsu Inoue, Jun Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Nishiyama
{"title":"免疫相关不良事件对联合免疫检查点/酪氨酸激酶抑制治疗转移性肾癌的预后影响","authors":"Bunpei Isoda, Masanobu Shiga, Shuya Kandori, Shota Takahashi, Akifumi Omiya, Tomoki Ishida, Kotoe Matsuda, Hiromichi Sakurai, Bryan J Mathis, Ken Tanaka, Manabu Komine, Masahiro Iinuma, Akira Joraku, Hiromitsu Negoro, Masakazu Tsutsumi, Takamitsu Inoue, Jun Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Nishiyama","doi":"10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use are standard for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), leading to improved outcomes. However, due to a lack of predictive biomarkers, the presence or absence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) is currently used as a predictive factor in clinical practice. To elucidate the impact of irAEs on efficacy, a cohort of patients with mRCC who received ICI-based combination therapy as initial treatment was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received dual-ICI therapy (ICI-ICI, N = 55) or ICI and TKI therapy (ICI-TKI, N = 55). Subsequent to this initial categorization, each group was further subdivided based on the presence or absence of irAEs. In the ICI-ICI group, patients with irAEs exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [PFS; OS (median): not reached vs. 17.9 months, P = 0.03/PFS (median): 51.4 vs. 5.8 months, P < 0.01]. Conversely, no such correlation was observed between irAEs and OS/PFS in the ICI-TKI group. [OS (median): 26.3 months vs. not reached, P = 0.73/PFS (median): 16.8 months vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.38] Furthermore, treatment discontinuation due to AEs accounted for 65% (N = 32) in the ICI-ICI group and 57% (N = 24) in the ICI-TKI group, with a slightly higher tendency observed in the ICI-ICI group. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of irAEs may differ depending on the treatment combination, and further basic research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In patients with mRCC who received ICI-ICI, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with improved survival outcomes, whereas no such association was observed in patients who received ICI-TKI. This suggests that irAEs may reflect the favorable immune response specific to ICI-ICI therapy, whereas differences in the tumor microenvironment, particularly involving neutrophils, in ICI-TKI patients may influence treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":72516,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research communications","volume":" ","pages":"1681-1689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Bunpei Isoda, Masanobu Shiga, Shuya Kandori, Shota Takahashi, Akifumi Omiya, Tomoki Ishida, Kotoe Matsuda, Hiromichi Sakurai, Bryan J Mathis, Ken Tanaka, Manabu Komine, Masahiro Iinuma, Akira Joraku, Hiromitsu Negoro, Masakazu Tsutsumi, Takamitsu Inoue, Jun Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Nishiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use are standard for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), leading to improved outcomes. However, due to a lack of predictive biomarkers, the presence or absence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) is currently used as a predictive factor in clinical practice. To elucidate the impact of irAEs on efficacy, a cohort of patients with mRCC who received ICI-based combination therapy as initial treatment was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received dual-ICI therapy (ICI-ICI, N = 55) or ICI and TKI therapy (ICI-TKI, N = 55). Subsequent to this initial categorization, each group was further subdivided based on the presence or absence of irAEs. In the ICI-ICI group, patients with irAEs exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [PFS; OS (median): not reached vs. 17.9 months, P = 0.03/PFS (median): 51.4 vs. 5.8 months, P < 0.01]. Conversely, no such correlation was observed between irAEs and OS/PFS in the ICI-TKI group. [OS (median): 26.3 months vs. not reached, P = 0.73/PFS (median): 16.8 months vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.38] Furthermore, treatment discontinuation due to AEs accounted for 65% (N = 32) in the ICI-ICI group and 57% (N = 24) in the ICI-TKI group, with a slightly higher tendency observed in the ICI-ICI group. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of irAEs may differ depending on the treatment combination, and further basic research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In patients with mRCC who received ICI-ICI, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with improved survival outcomes, whereas no such association was observed in patients who received ICI-TKI. This suggests that irAEs may reflect the favorable immune response specific to ICI-ICI therapy, whereas differences in the tumor microenvironment, particularly involving neutrophils, in ICI-TKI patients may influence treatment response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer research communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1681-1689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)的联合使用是转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的标准,可改善预后。然而,由于缺乏预测性生物标志物,免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的存在与否目前被用作临床实践中的预测因素。为了阐明irAEs对疗效的影响,我们分析了一组接受以ici为基础的联合治疗作为初始治疗的mRCC患者。患者分为两组:双ICI治疗组(ICI-ICI, N=55)和ICI + TKI治疗组(ICI-TKI, N=55)。在最初的分类之后,每组根据是否存在irAE进一步细分。在ICI-ICI组中,irAE患者表现出显著延长的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS) (OS(中位数):未达到vs 17.9个月,p = 0.03 / PFS(中位数):51.4个月vs 5.8个月,p < 0.01)。相反,ICI-TKI组的irAE和OS/PFS之间没有这种相关性。(OS(中位数):26.3个月vs. Not Reached, p = 0.73 / PFS(中位数):16.8个月vs. 11.9个月,p = 0.38)此外,ICI-ICI组因ae而停药的比例为65% (N=32), ICI-TKI组为57% (N=24),其中ICI-ICI组的趋势略高。这些发现表明,irAEs的预后影响可能因治疗组合而异,需要进一步的基础研究来阐明其潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer.

Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer.

Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer.

Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use are standard for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), leading to improved outcomes. However, due to a lack of predictive biomarkers, the presence or absence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) is currently used as a predictive factor in clinical practice. To elucidate the impact of irAEs on efficacy, a cohort of patients with mRCC who received ICI-based combination therapy as initial treatment was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received dual-ICI therapy (ICI-ICI, N = 55) or ICI and TKI therapy (ICI-TKI, N = 55). Subsequent to this initial categorization, each group was further subdivided based on the presence or absence of irAEs. In the ICI-ICI group, patients with irAEs exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [PFS; OS (median): not reached vs. 17.9 months, P = 0.03/PFS (median): 51.4 vs. 5.8 months, P < 0.01]. Conversely, no such correlation was observed between irAEs and OS/PFS in the ICI-TKI group. [OS (median): 26.3 months vs. not reached, P = 0.73/PFS (median): 16.8 months vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.38] Furthermore, treatment discontinuation due to AEs accounted for 65% (N = 32) in the ICI-ICI group and 57% (N = 24) in the ICI-TKI group, with a slightly higher tendency observed in the ICI-ICI group. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of irAEs may differ depending on the treatment combination, and further basic research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Significance: In patients with mRCC who received ICI-ICI, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with improved survival outcomes, whereas no such association was observed in patients who received ICI-TKI. This suggests that irAEs may reflect the favorable immune response specific to ICI-ICI therapy, whereas differences in the tumor microenvironment, particularly involving neutrophils, in ICI-TKI patients may influence treatment response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信