尿石症腔内治疗后临床无关紧要的残留碎片的影响:并发症和再干预率的系统回顾。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alberto Quarà, Letizia M Jannello, Alejandra Bravo-Balado, Stefano Moretto, Federico Zorzi, Ugo Gradilone, Hubert Werth, Mariela Corrales, Marie-Lou Letouche, Luigi Candela, Steeve Doizi, Frederic Panthier, Cristian Fiori, Olivier Traxer
{"title":"尿石症腔内治疗后临床无关紧要的残留碎片的影响:并发症和再干预率的系统回顾。","authors":"Alberto Quarà, Letizia M Jannello, Alejandra Bravo-Balado, Stefano Moretto, Federico Zorzi, Ugo Gradilone, Hubert Werth, Mariela Corrales, Marie-Lou Letouche, Luigi Candela, Steeve Doizi, Frederic Panthier, Cristian Fiori, Olivier Traxer","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06456-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving stone-free status (SFS) is a key goal of endourological treatment, yet definitions of SFS and clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) remain controversial. While CIRF is frequently defined as residual fragments ≤4 mm, there is no consensus on its clinical significance regarding complications and re-intervention needs. We evaluate the risk of complications and the need for re-intervention associated with the presence of CIRF following endourological treatment for urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web Of Science, and Embase databases were searched for articles relating to SFS and CIRF definitions and outcomes, in February 2025, using keyword combinations: \"stone-free rate,\" \"residual fragments,\" \"clinically insignificant residual fragments,\" \"urinary calculi,\" \"urolithiasis,\" \"complications,\" and \"outcome\". Inclusion criteria were all studies with SFS/CIRF definition and complications associated with residual fragments following treatment (shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria. From the pooled analysis the probability of spontaneous expulsion of CIRF≤4 mm was 33% (95% CI: 12-50%; P<0.001), while regrowth occurred in 32% (95% CI: 23-40%; P<0.001). CIRF-related complications were observed in 27% (95% CI: 21-34%; P<0.001), and the re-intervention rate was 21% (95% CI: 16-26%; P<0.001). Within a variable mean follow-up ranging from 3 to 59 months. The risk of bias was moderate overall, with single-arm studies exhibiting the highest bias risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CIRF≤4 mm should be monitored closely and informed about the non-neglectable likelihood of complications and of re-intervention. On the other hand, they have one probability out of three of spontaneous passage. Endourologist and patients should be aware of these outcomes to better plan the management, follow-up, and the \"insignificant\" nature of residual fragments. Hence, the aim of surgeries should be achieving the complete SFS, especially in high-risk stone former patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of clinically insignificant residual fragments following endourological management of urolithiasis: a systematic review of complications and re-intervention rates.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Quarà, Letizia M Jannello, Alejandra Bravo-Balado, Stefano Moretto, Federico Zorzi, Ugo Gradilone, Hubert Werth, Mariela Corrales, Marie-Lou Letouche, Luigi Candela, Steeve Doizi, Frederic Panthier, Cristian Fiori, Olivier Traxer\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06456-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving stone-free status (SFS) is a key goal of endourological treatment, yet definitions of SFS and clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) remain controversial. While CIRF is frequently defined as residual fragments ≤4 mm, there is no consensus on its clinical significance regarding complications and re-intervention needs. We evaluate the risk of complications and the need for re-intervention associated with the presence of CIRF following endourological treatment for urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web Of Science, and Embase databases were searched for articles relating to SFS and CIRF definitions and outcomes, in February 2025, using keyword combinations: \\\"stone-free rate,\\\" \\\"residual fragments,\\\" \\\"clinically insignificant residual fragments,\\\" \\\"urinary calculi,\\\" \\\"urolithiasis,\\\" \\\"complications,\\\" and \\\"outcome\\\". Inclusion criteria were all studies with SFS/CIRF definition and complications associated with residual fragments following treatment (shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria. From the pooled analysis the probability of spontaneous expulsion of CIRF≤4 mm was 33% (95% CI: 12-50%; P<0.001), while regrowth occurred in 32% (95% CI: 23-40%; P<0.001). CIRF-related complications were observed in 27% (95% CI: 21-34%; P<0.001), and the re-intervention rate was 21% (95% CI: 16-26%; P<0.001). Within a variable mean follow-up ranging from 3 to 59 months. The risk of bias was moderate overall, with single-arm studies exhibiting the highest bias risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CIRF≤4 mm should be monitored closely and informed about the non-neglectable likelihood of complications and of re-intervention. On the other hand, they have one probability out of three of spontaneous passage. Endourologist and patients should be aware of these outcomes to better plan the management, follow-up, and the \\\"insignificant\\\" nature of residual fragments. Hence, the aim of surgeries should be achieving the complete SFS, especially in high-risk stone former patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06456-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06456-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现无结石状态(SFS)是泌尿系统治疗的一个关键目标,然而SFS和临床无关紧要的残留碎片(CIRF)的定义仍然存在争议。虽然CIRF通常被定义为残余碎片≤4mm,但其在并发症和再干预需求方面的临床意义尚无共识。我们评估了尿石症腔内治疗后与CIRF存在相关的并发症风险和再次干预的必要性。证据获取:我们于2025年2月在PubMed/Medline、Scopus、Web Of Science和Embase数据库中检索与SFS和CIRF定义和结果相关的文章,关键词组合为:“无结石率”、“残留碎片”、“临床不显著残留碎片”、“尿路结石”、“尿石症”、“并发症”和“结果”。纳入标准是所有具有SFS/CIRF定义和治疗后残余碎片相关并发症的研究(冲击波碎石、输尿管镜检查或经皮肾镜取石术)。证据综合:52项研究符合纳入标准。从合并分析来看,自发排出CIRF≤4 mm的概率为33% (95% CI: 12-50%);结论:应密切监测CIRF≤4 mm的患者,并告知其并发症和再干预的不可忽视的可能性。另一方面,它们有三分之一的概率自发通过。泌尿科医生和患者应该意识到这些结果,以便更好地计划管理、随访和残余碎片的“无关紧要”性质。因此,手术的目的应是实现完全的SFS,特别是对高危结石患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of clinically insignificant residual fragments following endourological management of urolithiasis: a systematic review of complications and re-intervention rates.

Introduction: Achieving stone-free status (SFS) is a key goal of endourological treatment, yet definitions of SFS and clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) remain controversial. While CIRF is frequently defined as residual fragments ≤4 mm, there is no consensus on its clinical significance regarding complications and re-intervention needs. We evaluate the risk of complications and the need for re-intervention associated with the presence of CIRF following endourological treatment for urolithiasis.

Evidence acquisition: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web Of Science, and Embase databases were searched for articles relating to SFS and CIRF definitions and outcomes, in February 2025, using keyword combinations: "stone-free rate," "residual fragments," "clinically insignificant residual fragments," "urinary calculi," "urolithiasis," "complications," and "outcome". Inclusion criteria were all studies with SFS/CIRF definition and complications associated with residual fragments following treatment (shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy).

Evidence synthesis: Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria. From the pooled analysis the probability of spontaneous expulsion of CIRF≤4 mm was 33% (95% CI: 12-50%; P<0.001), while regrowth occurred in 32% (95% CI: 23-40%; P<0.001). CIRF-related complications were observed in 27% (95% CI: 21-34%; P<0.001), and the re-intervention rate was 21% (95% CI: 16-26%; P<0.001). Within a variable mean follow-up ranging from 3 to 59 months. The risk of bias was moderate overall, with single-arm studies exhibiting the highest bias risk.

Conclusions: Patients with CIRF≤4 mm should be monitored closely and informed about the non-neglectable likelihood of complications and of re-intervention. On the other hand, they have one probability out of three of spontaneous passage. Endourologist and patients should be aware of these outcomes to better plan the management, follow-up, and the "insignificant" nature of residual fragments. Hence, the aim of surgeries should be achieving the complete SFS, especially in high-risk stone former patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信