父母的过程升级照顾他们的恶化儿童入院儿科病房:一个接地理论。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Catia Genna, Kiara Ros Thekkan, Immacolata Dall'oglio, Emanuela Tiozzo, Massimiliano Raponi, Corrado Cecchetti, Orsola Gawronski
{"title":"父母的过程升级照顾他们的恶化儿童入院儿科病房:一个接地理论。","authors":"Catia Genna, Kiara Ros Thekkan, Immacolata Dall'oglio, Emanuela Tiozzo, Massimiliano Raponi, Corrado Cecchetti, Orsola Gawronski","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Explore the care escalation process initiated by parents concerned about their hospitalised child's deterioration and healthcare providers' response to parental concerns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included healthcare providers, cultural mediators and parents of children hospitalized for ≥ 3 days, who had experienced previous urgent intensive care admission or parental concern during hospitalization, in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data were collected through focus groups, and analyzed using a grounded theory methodology with NVivo Software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 parents, 7 cultural mediators and 68 healthcare providers participated in 16 focus groups. Two main categories were identified: (1) Parents navigating the uncertainty of the escalation system to get a response; (2) Healthcare providers balancing parents' concerns, their own situation awareness, escalation processes and team relations. We developed a Grounded theory called 'Parents Supporting Timely Escalation Processes' (P-STEP). By monitoring their children, parents identify early signs of deterioration and advocate for escalation. Reasons for concern are their child's behaviour, communication failure and admission on an off-service ward. Parents escalate by contacting ward providers, their child's specialist or the most trusted staff and, only selected parents, the Rapid Response Team. Staff escalate parents' concern according to their own situation awareness, parent evaluation and ward escalation practices. Parent's emotions and trust are influenced by the timeliness and type of staff response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While some parents effectively advocate for their child, others face obstacles due to unclear and lack of formal care escalation systems. Understanding how parents escalate care and healthcare providers respond is essential to identify facilitators, barriers, key stakeholders, and implement a formal system for parent-initiated escalation of care.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Integrating parents into processes of escalation and rapid response systems could optimise early recognition and improve responsiveness in paediatric deterioration.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The study adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Parents and HCPs participated as interview respondents.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parent's Process of Escalation of Care for Their Deteriorating Children Admitted to Paediatric Wards: A Grounded Theory.\",\"authors\":\"Catia Genna, Kiara Ros Thekkan, Immacolata Dall'oglio, Emanuela Tiozzo, Massimiliano Raponi, Corrado Cecchetti, Orsola Gawronski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Explore the care escalation process initiated by parents concerned about their hospitalised child's deterioration and healthcare providers' response to parental concerns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included healthcare providers, cultural mediators and parents of children hospitalized for ≥ 3 days, who had experienced previous urgent intensive care admission or parental concern during hospitalization, in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data were collected through focus groups, and analyzed using a grounded theory methodology with NVivo Software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 parents, 7 cultural mediators and 68 healthcare providers participated in 16 focus groups. Two main categories were identified: (1) Parents navigating the uncertainty of the escalation system to get a response; (2) Healthcare providers balancing parents' concerns, their own situation awareness, escalation processes and team relations. We developed a Grounded theory called 'Parents Supporting Timely Escalation Processes' (P-STEP). By monitoring their children, parents identify early signs of deterioration and advocate for escalation. Reasons for concern are their child's behaviour, communication failure and admission on an off-service ward. Parents escalate by contacting ward providers, their child's specialist or the most trusted staff and, only selected parents, the Rapid Response Team. Staff escalate parents' concern according to their own situation awareness, parent evaluation and ward escalation practices. Parent's emotions and trust are influenced by the timeliness and type of staff response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While some parents effectively advocate for their child, others face obstacles due to unclear and lack of formal care escalation systems. Understanding how parents escalate care and healthcare providers respond is essential to identify facilitators, barriers, key stakeholders, and implement a formal system for parent-initiated escalation of care.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Integrating parents into processes of escalation and rapid response systems could optimise early recognition and improve responsiveness in paediatric deterioration.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The study adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Parents and HCPs participated as interview respondents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨由父母对其住院儿童病情恶化的担忧所引发的护理升级过程,以及医疗保健提供者对父母担忧的回应。设计:运用Charmaz的建构主义理论进行定性研究。方法:参与者包括三级儿科医院的医疗服务提供者、文化调解员和住院≥3天的儿童的父母,这些儿童在住院期间曾经历过紧急重症监护或父母的关注。通过焦点小组收集数据,并使用NVivo软件采用扎根理论方法进行分析。结果:共有13名家长、7名文化调解员和68名医护人员参加了16个焦点小组。研究确定了两个主要类别:(1)家长在不确定的升级系统中导航以获得回应;(2)医疗保健提供者平衡父母的担忧,他们自己的情况意识,升级过程和团队关系。我们发展了一个有根据的理论,叫做“父母支持及时升级过程”(P-STEP)。通过监控孩子,父母可以识别出病情恶化的早期迹象,并提倡升级。担心的原因是他们孩子的行为、沟通障碍和被送进非服务病房。家长通过联系病房提供者、孩子的专家或最值得信赖的工作人员,以及(只有选定的家长)快速反应小组来升级。工作人员根据自己的情况意识、家长评估和病房升级实践来升级家长的担忧。家长的情绪和信任受员工反应的及时性和类型的影响。结论:虽然一些家长有效地为他们的孩子进行了倡导,但由于不明确和缺乏正式的护理升级系统,其他家长面临障碍。了解父母如何升级护理和医疗保健提供者如何应对,对于确定促进因素、障碍、关键利益相关者和实施父母发起的升级护理的正式系统至关重要。对专业和患者护理的影响:将父母纳入升级和快速反应系统的过程可以优化早期识别并提高对儿科恶化的反应能力。报告方法:本研究遵循报告定性研究的综合标准(COREQ)指南。患者或公众贡献:家长和医护人员作为访谈对象参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parent's Process of Escalation of Care for Their Deteriorating Children Admitted to Paediatric Wards: A Grounded Theory.

Aim: Explore the care escalation process initiated by parents concerned about their hospitalised child's deterioration and healthcare providers' response to parental concerns.

Design: A qualitative study using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory.

Methods: Participants included healthcare providers, cultural mediators and parents of children hospitalized for ≥ 3 days, who had experienced previous urgent intensive care admission or parental concern during hospitalization, in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data were collected through focus groups, and analyzed using a grounded theory methodology with NVivo Software.

Results: A total of 13 parents, 7 cultural mediators and 68 healthcare providers participated in 16 focus groups. Two main categories were identified: (1) Parents navigating the uncertainty of the escalation system to get a response; (2) Healthcare providers balancing parents' concerns, their own situation awareness, escalation processes and team relations. We developed a Grounded theory called 'Parents Supporting Timely Escalation Processes' (P-STEP). By monitoring their children, parents identify early signs of deterioration and advocate for escalation. Reasons for concern are their child's behaviour, communication failure and admission on an off-service ward. Parents escalate by contacting ward providers, their child's specialist or the most trusted staff and, only selected parents, the Rapid Response Team. Staff escalate parents' concern according to their own situation awareness, parent evaluation and ward escalation practices. Parent's emotions and trust are influenced by the timeliness and type of staff response.

Conclusion: While some parents effectively advocate for their child, others face obstacles due to unclear and lack of formal care escalation systems. Understanding how parents escalate care and healthcare providers respond is essential to identify facilitators, barriers, key stakeholders, and implement a formal system for parent-initiated escalation of care.

Implications for the profession and patient care: Integrating parents into processes of escalation and rapid response systems could optimise early recognition and improve responsiveness in paediatric deterioration.

Reporting method: The study adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.

Patient or public contribution: Parents and HCPs participated as interview respondents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信