【3D腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术对前列腺癌患者尿控及性功能的影响】。

Q4 Medicine
中华男科学杂志 Pub Date : 2025-08-01
Jie Xie, Zhen-Jia Dong, Qiang-Dong Wang, Yao Yan, Xu Xiao
{"title":"【3D腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术对前列腺癌患者尿控及性功能的影响】。","authors":"Jie Xie, Zhen-Jia Dong, Qiang-Dong Wang, Yao Yan, Xu Xiao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: To investigate the effects of 3D laparoscopic radical resection prostatectomy(LRP) on urinary control and sexual function of patients with prostatic cancer. Methods: A total of 268 patients who were treated with LRP in the Fifth People's Hospital of Huai'an City from January 2019 to May 2022 were selected and divided into 2 groups according to surgical methods, with 134 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with traditional LRP, and the 3D LRP was used in the observation group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The patients in observation group had less blood loss ([135.62±13.58] mL vs [143.18±14.89] mL) and shorter indwelling catheter time ([8.26±1.47] d vs [9.78±1.73] d) compared with control group, but the operation time ([160.52±10.78] min vs [154.47±10.41] min) was longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The recovery of sexual function and urinary control in the observation group was better than that in the control group after 3, 6 and 12 months of the surgery(P<0.05). After one month of surgery, the scores of ICIQ-SF and 1h urine pad test were lower than those of the control group. The EPIC-UIN score([72.63±6.85] points vs [67.15±5.09] points)of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The patients in the observation group had lower level of residual urine volume([60.26±6.63]mL vs [76.89±7.89]mL), higher maximum urine flow rate([7.52±0.46]mL/s vs [6.17±0.43]mL/s) and detrusor pressure([85.19±7.18]mL vs [76.29±6.85]mL) at maximum urine flow rate compared with the control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the observation group and the control group (5.97% vs8.27%,P>0.05). The recurrence rate of tumor 3 years after operation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (11.94% vs 29.10%, χ2=12.102, P<0.05). Conclusion: 3D LRP has obvious advantages in surgical clarity and precision, which reduces the risk of postoperative complications and improves urinary control ability and sexual function of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":24012,"journal":{"name":"中华男科学杂志","volume":"31 8","pages":"703-708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary control and sexual function of patients with prostate cancer].\",\"authors\":\"Jie Xie, Zhen-Jia Dong, Qiang-Dong Wang, Yao Yan, Xu Xiao\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective: To investigate the effects of 3D laparoscopic radical resection prostatectomy(LRP) on urinary control and sexual function of patients with prostatic cancer. Methods: A total of 268 patients who were treated with LRP in the Fifth People's Hospital of Huai'an City from January 2019 to May 2022 were selected and divided into 2 groups according to surgical methods, with 134 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with traditional LRP, and the 3D LRP was used in the observation group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The patients in observation group had less blood loss ([135.62±13.58] mL vs [143.18±14.89] mL) and shorter indwelling catheter time ([8.26±1.47] d vs [9.78±1.73] d) compared with control group, but the operation time ([160.52±10.78] min vs [154.47±10.41] min) was longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The recovery of sexual function and urinary control in the observation group was better than that in the control group after 3, 6 and 12 months of the surgery(P<0.05). After one month of surgery, the scores of ICIQ-SF and 1h urine pad test were lower than those of the control group. The EPIC-UIN score([72.63±6.85] points vs [67.15±5.09] points)of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The patients in the observation group had lower level of residual urine volume([60.26±6.63]mL vs [76.89±7.89]mL), higher maximum urine flow rate([7.52±0.46]mL/s vs [6.17±0.43]mL/s) and detrusor pressure([85.19±7.18]mL vs [76.29±6.85]mL) at maximum urine flow rate compared with the control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the observation group and the control group (5.97% vs8.27%,P>0.05). The recurrence rate of tumor 3 years after operation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (11.94% vs 29.10%, χ2=12.102, P<0.05). Conclusion: 3D LRP has obvious advantages in surgical clarity and precision, which reduces the risk of postoperative complications and improves urinary control ability and sexual function of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华男科学杂志\",\"volume\":\"31 8\",\"pages\":\"703-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华男科学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华男科学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨三维腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)对前列腺癌患者泌尿控制及性功能的影响。方法:选取2019年1月~ 2022年5月淮安市第五人民医院行LRP手术的患者268例,按手术方式分为2组,每组134例。对照组采用传统LRP治疗,观察组采用3D LRP治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果:观察组患者失血量([135.62±13.58]mL vs[143.18±14.89]mL)少于对照组,留置导管时间([8.26±1.47]d vs[9.78±1.73]d)短于对照组,但手术时间([160.52±10.78]min vs[154.47±10.41]min)长于对照组(P0.05)。观察组术后3年肿瘤复发率低于对照组(11.94% vs 29.10%, χ2=12.102, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effect of 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary control and sexual function of patients with prostate cancer].

Objective: To investigate the effects of 3D laparoscopic radical resection prostatectomy(LRP) on urinary control and sexual function of patients with prostatic cancer. Methods: A total of 268 patients who were treated with LRP in the Fifth People's Hospital of Huai'an City from January 2019 to May 2022 were selected and divided into 2 groups according to surgical methods, with 134 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with traditional LRP, and the 3D LRP was used in the observation group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The patients in observation group had less blood loss ([135.62±13.58] mL vs [143.18±14.89] mL) and shorter indwelling catheter time ([8.26±1.47] d vs [9.78±1.73] d) compared with control group, but the operation time ([160.52±10.78] min vs [154.47±10.41] min) was longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The recovery of sexual function and urinary control in the observation group was better than that in the control group after 3, 6 and 12 months of the surgery(P<0.05). After one month of surgery, the scores of ICIQ-SF and 1h urine pad test were lower than those of the control group. The EPIC-UIN score([72.63±6.85] points vs [67.15±5.09] points)of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The patients in the observation group had lower level of residual urine volume([60.26±6.63]mL vs [76.89±7.89]mL), higher maximum urine flow rate([7.52±0.46]mL/s vs [6.17±0.43]mL/s) and detrusor pressure([85.19±7.18]mL vs [76.29±6.85]mL) at maximum urine flow rate compared with the control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the observation group and the control group (5.97% vs8.27%,P>0.05). The recurrence rate of tumor 3 years after operation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (11.94% vs 29.10%, χ2=12.102, P<0.05). Conclusion: 3D LRP has obvious advantages in surgical clarity and precision, which reduces the risk of postoperative complications and improves urinary control ability and sexual function of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华男科学杂志
中华男科学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5367
期刊介绍: National journal of andrology was founded in June 1995. It is a core journal of andrology and reproductive medicine, published monthly, and is publicly distributed at home and abroad. The main columns include expert talks, monographs (basic research, clinical research, evidence-based medicine, traditional Chinese medicine), reviews, clinical experience exchanges, case reports, etc. Priority is given to various fund-funded projects, especially the 12th Five-Year National Support Plan and the National Natural Science Foundation funded projects. This journal is included in about 20 domestic databases, including the National Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Journal (China Science and Technology Core Journal), the Source Journal of the China Science Citation Database, the Statistical Source Journal of the China Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database (CAJCED), the Full-text Collection Journal of the China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), the Overview of the Chinese Core Journals (2017 Edition), and the Source Journal of the Top Academic Papers of China's Fine Science and Technology Journals (F5000). It has been included in the full text of the American Chemical Abstracts, the American MEDLINE, the American EBSCO, and the database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信