在线,跨专业中风模拟的结果:混合方法分析。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Caleb Brown, Emory Latimer, Sol de Jesus, Kelly Karpa
{"title":"在线,跨专业中风模拟的结果:混合方法分析。","authors":"Caleb Brown, Emory Latimer, Sol de Jesus, Kelly Karpa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Educational approaches used in distance learning courses may be applicable to interprofessional education (IPE) simulation events to promote student engagement and learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Various strategies known to be effective when teaching online courses (real world applications, self-directed learning, reliance on previous life experiences, communities of practice, and emotional engagement) were incorporated into an interprofessional simulation event. Learning outcomes were captured quantitatively through student ratings of learning objective accomplishment and qualitatively through thematic analyses of learner reflections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cumulative Likert responses for 375 interprofessional students exceeded 4.15±0.57 (1=disagree strongly; 5=strongly agree) for each learning objective statement. Students collectively submit¬ted 1,044 reflection comments. Inductive thematic analysis of skills and knowledge reinforced from participation identified 84 codes corresponding to 10 thematic areas: collab¬oration, communication, efficiency, knowledge, leadership, patient-centeredness, personal growth, roles, teams, and values/ethics. Moreover, a separate theoretical thematic analysis using newly revised 2023 Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) subcompetencies as a framework revealed that each subcompetency was reflected by ≥1 student comment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distance-learning principles can be applied to IPE events to promote engagement, accomplish learning objectives, and facilitate professional identify formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"54 3","pages":"e265-e273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of an Online, Interprofessional Stroke Simulation: Mixed Methods Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Caleb Brown, Emory Latimer, Sol de Jesus, Kelly Karpa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Educational approaches used in distance learning courses may be applicable to interprofessional education (IPE) simulation events to promote student engagement and learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Various strategies known to be effective when teaching online courses (real world applications, self-directed learning, reliance on previous life experiences, communities of practice, and emotional engagement) were incorporated into an interprofessional simulation event. Learning outcomes were captured quantitatively through student ratings of learning objective accomplishment and qualitatively through thematic analyses of learner reflections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cumulative Likert responses for 375 interprofessional students exceeded 4.15±0.57 (1=disagree strongly; 5=strongly agree) for each learning objective statement. Students collectively submit¬ted 1,044 reflection comments. Inductive thematic analysis of skills and knowledge reinforced from participation identified 84 codes corresponding to 10 thematic areas: collab¬oration, communication, efficiency, knowledge, leadership, patient-centeredness, personal growth, roles, teams, and values/ethics. Moreover, a separate theoretical thematic analysis using newly revised 2023 Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) subcompetencies as a framework revealed that each subcompetency was reflected by ≥1 student comment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distance-learning principles can be applied to IPE events to promote engagement, accomplish learning objectives, and facilitate professional identify formation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"e265-e273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在远程学习课程中使用的教育方法可能适用于跨专业教育(IPE)模拟事件,以促进学生的参与和学习。方法:在教授在线课程(现实世界的应用、自主学习、依赖以前的生活经验、实践社区和情感参与)时,各种已知有效的策略被纳入一个跨专业的模拟事件中。学习成果通过学生对学习目标完成程度的评分来量化,通过学习者反思的专题分析来定性。结果:375名跨专业学生对每个学习目标陈述的累积Likert反应超过4.15±0.57(1=非常不同意;5=非常同意)。学生们总共提交了1044条反思意见。对参与增强的技能和知识进行归纳专题分析,确定了对应于10个专题领域的84条准则:协作、沟通、效率、知识、领导、以病人为中心、个人成长、角色、团队和价值观/道德。此外,使用新修订的2023跨专业教育协作(IPEC)子胜任力作为框架的单独理论专题分析显示,每个子胜任力由≥1个学生评论反映。结论:远程学习原则可以应用于IPE事件,以促进参与,完成学习目标,并促进专业认同的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of an Online, Interprofessional Stroke Simulation: Mixed Methods Analysis.

Introduction: Educational approaches used in distance learning courses may be applicable to interprofessional education (IPE) simulation events to promote student engagement and learning.

Methods: Various strategies known to be effective when teaching online courses (real world applications, self-directed learning, reliance on previous life experiences, communities of practice, and emotional engagement) were incorporated into an interprofessional simulation event. Learning outcomes were captured quantitatively through student ratings of learning objective accomplishment and qualitatively through thematic analyses of learner reflections.

Results: Cumulative Likert responses for 375 interprofessional students exceeded 4.15±0.57 (1=disagree strongly; 5=strongly agree) for each learning objective statement. Students collectively submit¬ted 1,044 reflection comments. Inductive thematic analysis of skills and knowledge reinforced from participation identified 84 codes corresponding to 10 thematic areas: collab¬oration, communication, efficiency, knowledge, leadership, patient-centeredness, personal growth, roles, teams, and values/ethics. Moreover, a separate theoretical thematic analysis using newly revised 2023 Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) subcompetencies as a framework revealed that each subcompetency was reflected by ≥1 student comment.

Conclusion: Distance-learning principles can be applied to IPE events to promote engagement, accomplish learning objectives, and facilitate professional identify formation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信