联合医疗项目的跨专业教育:机会还是多余的努力?

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Albert K Okrah, J Dustin Tracy, Jespher Onyango, Audrey Eubanks, Tiffany Coleman, Gianluca De Leo
{"title":"联合医疗项目的跨专业教育:机会还是多余的努力?","authors":"Albert K Okrah, J Dustin Tracy, Jespher Onyango, Audrey Eubanks, Tiffany Coleman, Gianluca De Leo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been growing recognition of the importance of interprofessional education (IPE) in preparing healthcare professionals for collaborative and patient-focused practices. While allied health professional programs have included IPE in their curricula for years, there is limited evidence of its impact on graduates' professional lives and its contribution to improved patient care. Faculty from eight accredited allied health programs were invited to complete a web-based survey. Most participants (n=190) reported already implementing IPE in their programs. Three-quarters of participants (n=143, 75%) reported they were not measuring the impact of IPE on graduates' professional lives. Among those that do measure it, one-third reported that IPE had \"a great deal\" or \"a lot\" of impact (n=17, 36.2%) on the professional lives of their graduates. Similarly, most participants (n=158, 84%) reported not assessing IPE's impact on overall patient care. Among those who did consider the effect on patient care, more than one-third (n=14, 45.2%) of the respondents indicated that IPE had \"a great deal\" or \"a lot\" of impact on patient care. Our results show that few programs measure IPE's effect on professional practice, with even fewer assessing its impact on patient care. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies evaluating IPE's effectiveness in clinical settings and its connection to interprofessional practice in health settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"54 3","pages":"e257-e263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional Education in Allied Health Programs: Opportunity or Superfluous Effort?\",\"authors\":\"Albert K Okrah, J Dustin Tracy, Jespher Onyango, Audrey Eubanks, Tiffany Coleman, Gianluca De Leo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There has been growing recognition of the importance of interprofessional education (IPE) in preparing healthcare professionals for collaborative and patient-focused practices. While allied health professional programs have included IPE in their curricula for years, there is limited evidence of its impact on graduates' professional lives and its contribution to improved patient care. Faculty from eight accredited allied health programs were invited to complete a web-based survey. Most participants (n=190) reported already implementing IPE in their programs. Three-quarters of participants (n=143, 75%) reported they were not measuring the impact of IPE on graduates' professional lives. Among those that do measure it, one-third reported that IPE had \\\"a great deal\\\" or \\\"a lot\\\" of impact (n=17, 36.2%) on the professional lives of their graduates. Similarly, most participants (n=158, 84%) reported not assessing IPE's impact on overall patient care. Among those who did consider the effect on patient care, more than one-third (n=14, 45.2%) of the respondents indicated that IPE had \\\"a great deal\\\" or \\\"a lot\\\" of impact on patient care. Our results show that few programs measure IPE's effect on professional practice, with even fewer assessing its impact on patient care. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies evaluating IPE's effectiveness in clinical settings and its connection to interprofessional practice in health settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"e257-e263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们越来越认识到跨专业教育(IPE)在为医疗保健专业人员准备协作和以患者为中心的实践方面的重要性。虽然联合医疗专业课程多年来一直将IPE纳入课程,但它对毕业生职业生涯的影响及其对改善患者护理的贡献的证据有限。来自八个认可的联合医疗项目的教师被邀请完成一项基于网络的调查。大多数参与者(n=190)报告已经在他们的项目中实施了IPE。四分之三的参与者(n= 143,75%)表示,他们没有衡量IPE对毕业生职业生涯的影响。在那些确实对其进行了测量的学校中,三分之一的学校表示IPE对其毕业生的职业生涯产生了“很大”或“很大”的影响(n= 17,36.2%)。同样,大多数参与者(n= 158,84%)报告没有评估IPE对整体患者护理的影响。在考虑对患者护理的影响的受访者中,超过三分之一(n= 14,45.2%)的受访者表示IPE对患者护理有“很大”或“很多”的影响。我们的研究结果表明,很少有项目衡量IPE对专业实践的影响,评估其对患者护理的影响的项目就更少了。未来的研究应优先考虑纵向研究,评估IPE在临床环境中的有效性及其与卫生环境中跨专业实践的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interprofessional Education in Allied Health Programs: Opportunity or Superfluous Effort?

There has been growing recognition of the importance of interprofessional education (IPE) in preparing healthcare professionals for collaborative and patient-focused practices. While allied health professional programs have included IPE in their curricula for years, there is limited evidence of its impact on graduates' professional lives and its contribution to improved patient care. Faculty from eight accredited allied health programs were invited to complete a web-based survey. Most participants (n=190) reported already implementing IPE in their programs. Three-quarters of participants (n=143, 75%) reported they were not measuring the impact of IPE on graduates' professional lives. Among those that do measure it, one-third reported that IPE had "a great deal" or "a lot" of impact (n=17, 36.2%) on the professional lives of their graduates. Similarly, most participants (n=158, 84%) reported not assessing IPE's impact on overall patient care. Among those who did consider the effect on patient care, more than one-third (n=14, 45.2%) of the respondents indicated that IPE had "a great deal" or "a lot" of impact on patient care. Our results show that few programs measure IPE's effect on professional practice, with even fewer assessing its impact on patient care. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies evaluating IPE's effectiveness in clinical settings and its connection to interprofessional practice in health settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信