健康科学家的博士之旅:促进批判性思维技能的蓝图。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Natalie Neubauer, Genevieve Pinto Zipp
{"title":"健康科学家的博士之旅:促进批判性思维技能的蓝图。","authors":"Natalie Neubauer, Genevieve Pinto Zipp","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To advance evidence-based person-centered care, health professionals must see themselves as health scientists who possess the skills to administer healthcare and advance scholarship supporting healthcare practices. However, formal and objective assessment of critical thinking development along the doctoral journey is limited. This project sought to evaluate critical thinking development along a health science (HS) doctoral program using the Health Science Reasoning Test (HSRT). A cross-sectional study design was employed during Phase 1, for a snapshot of current students' critical thinking skills. All PhD in HS students at all points in their doctoral program in the University were invited to anonymously complete the HSRT survey. Total HSRT scores from 27 students were reviewed in relation to achieved program competencies to identify potential trends in the data. Administering the HSRT during that period enabled the researchers to link the HSRT scores to a specific point in the program and thus to assess the level of critical thinking at key points in the program. Phase 1 of this project supports the idea that academic programs can identify critical thinking skills of health sciences doctoral students and assess the doctoral journey success in meeting its mission to promote development of critical thinking using the HSRT. Based upon the study's findings, a blueprint is proposed for health science doctoral education to measure critical thinking development.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"54 3","pages":"e321-e326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Scientists' Doctoral Journey: A Blueprint for Promoting Critical Thinking Skills.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Neubauer, Genevieve Pinto Zipp\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To advance evidence-based person-centered care, health professionals must see themselves as health scientists who possess the skills to administer healthcare and advance scholarship supporting healthcare practices. However, formal and objective assessment of critical thinking development along the doctoral journey is limited. This project sought to evaluate critical thinking development along a health science (HS) doctoral program using the Health Science Reasoning Test (HSRT). A cross-sectional study design was employed during Phase 1, for a snapshot of current students' critical thinking skills. All PhD in HS students at all points in their doctoral program in the University were invited to anonymously complete the HSRT survey. Total HSRT scores from 27 students were reviewed in relation to achieved program competencies to identify potential trends in the data. Administering the HSRT during that period enabled the researchers to link the HSRT scores to a specific point in the program and thus to assess the level of critical thinking at key points in the program. Phase 1 of this project supports the idea that academic programs can identify critical thinking skills of health sciences doctoral students and assess the doctoral journey success in meeting its mission to promote development of critical thinking using the HSRT. Based upon the study's findings, a blueprint is proposed for health science doctoral education to measure critical thinking development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"e321-e326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了推进基于证据的以人为本的护理,卫生专业人员必须将自己视为拥有管理医疗保健技能的卫生科学家,并推进支持医疗保健实践的奖学金。然而,对博士生批判性思维发展的正式和客观的评估是有限的。本项目旨在利用健康科学推理测试(HSRT)来评估健康科学博士课程中批判性思维的发展。第一阶段采用了横断面研究设计,以了解当前学生的批判性思维技能。所有在哈佛大学攻读博士学位的博士生都被邀请匿名完成HSRT调查。对27名学生的HSRT总分进行了评估,以确定数据中的潜在趋势。在此期间进行HSRT使研究人员能够将HSRT分数与项目中的特定点联系起来,从而评估项目中关键点的批判性思维水平。该项目的第一阶段支持这样一种观点,即学术项目可以识别卫生科学博士生的批判性思维技能,并评估博士之旅是否成功,以实现其利用HSRT促进批判性思维发展的使命。在此基础上,提出了衡量批判性思维发展的健康科学博士教育蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Scientists' Doctoral Journey: A Blueprint for Promoting Critical Thinking Skills.

To advance evidence-based person-centered care, health professionals must see themselves as health scientists who possess the skills to administer healthcare and advance scholarship supporting healthcare practices. However, formal and objective assessment of critical thinking development along the doctoral journey is limited. This project sought to evaluate critical thinking development along a health science (HS) doctoral program using the Health Science Reasoning Test (HSRT). A cross-sectional study design was employed during Phase 1, for a snapshot of current students' critical thinking skills. All PhD in HS students at all points in their doctoral program in the University were invited to anonymously complete the HSRT survey. Total HSRT scores from 27 students were reviewed in relation to achieved program competencies to identify potential trends in the data. Administering the HSRT during that period enabled the researchers to link the HSRT scores to a specific point in the program and thus to assess the level of critical thinking at key points in the program. Phase 1 of this project supports the idea that academic programs can identify critical thinking skills of health sciences doctoral students and assess the doctoral journey success in meeting its mission to promote development of critical thinking using the HSRT. Based upon the study's findings, a blueprint is proposed for health science doctoral education to measure critical thinking development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信