系对性状的比较分析。

IF 5.7 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Sean A S Anderson, Sachin Kaushik, Daniel R Matute
{"title":"系对性状的比较分析。","authors":"Sean A S Anderson, Sachin Kaushik, Daniel R Matute","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syaf061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For many questions in ecology and evolution, the most relevant data to consider are attributes of lineage pairs. Comparative tests for causal relationships among traits like 'diet niche overlap', 'divergence time', and 'strength of reproductive isolation (RI)' - measured for pairwise combinations of related species or populations - have led to several groundbreaking insights, but the correct statistical approach for these analyses has never been clear. Lineage-pair traits are non-independent, but unlike the expected covariance among species' traits, which is captured by a phylogenetic covariance matrix arising from a given model, the expected covariance among lineage-pair traits has not been explicitly formulated. Analyses of pairwise-defined data have thus employed untested workarounds for non-independence rather than direct models of lineage-pair covariance, with consequences that are unexplored. Here, we consider how evolutionary relatedness among taxa translates into non-independence among taxonomic pairs. We develop models by which phylogenetic signal in an underlying character generates covariance among pairs in a lineage-pair trait. We incorporate the resulting lineage-pair covariance matrices into modified versions of phylogenetic generalized least squares and a new phylogenetic beta regression for bounded response variables. Both outperform previous approaches in simulation tests. We find that a common heuristic method, node averaging, imparts a greater cost to model performance than does the non-independence it was designed to correct. We re-analyze two empirical datasets to find dramatic improvements in model fit and, in the case of avian hybridization data, an even stronger relationship between pair age and RI than is revealed from uncorrected analysis. We finally present a new tool, the R package phylopairs, that allows empiricists to test relationships among pairwise-defined variables in a way that is statistically robust and more straightforward to implement.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparative analysis of lineage-pair traits.\",\"authors\":\"Sean A S Anderson, Sachin Kaushik, Daniel R Matute\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sysbio/syaf061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For many questions in ecology and evolution, the most relevant data to consider are attributes of lineage pairs. Comparative tests for causal relationships among traits like 'diet niche overlap', 'divergence time', and 'strength of reproductive isolation (RI)' - measured for pairwise combinations of related species or populations - have led to several groundbreaking insights, but the correct statistical approach for these analyses has never been clear. Lineage-pair traits are non-independent, but unlike the expected covariance among species' traits, which is captured by a phylogenetic covariance matrix arising from a given model, the expected covariance among lineage-pair traits has not been explicitly formulated. Analyses of pairwise-defined data have thus employed untested workarounds for non-independence rather than direct models of lineage-pair covariance, with consequences that are unexplored. Here, we consider how evolutionary relatedness among taxa translates into non-independence among taxonomic pairs. We develop models by which phylogenetic signal in an underlying character generates covariance among pairs in a lineage-pair trait. We incorporate the resulting lineage-pair covariance matrices into modified versions of phylogenetic generalized least squares and a new phylogenetic beta regression for bounded response variables. Both outperform previous approaches in simulation tests. We find that a common heuristic method, node averaging, imparts a greater cost to model performance than does the non-independence it was designed to correct. We re-analyze two empirical datasets to find dramatic improvements in model fit and, in the case of avian hybridization data, an even stronger relationship between pair age and RI than is revealed from uncorrected analysis. We finally present a new tool, the R package phylopairs, that allows empiricists to test relationships among pairwise-defined variables in a way that is statistically robust and more straightforward to implement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf061\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于生态学和进化中的许多问题,最需要考虑的相关数据是谱系对的属性。对“饮食生态位重叠”、“分化时间”和“生殖隔离强度(RI)”等性状之间因果关系的比较测试——对相关物种或种群的成对组合进行测量——已经产生了一些开创性的见解,但这些分析的正确统计方法从未明确过。谱系对性状是非独立的,但与物种性状之间的预期协方差不同,物种性状之间的预期协方差是由给定模型产生的系统发育协方差矩阵捕获的,谱系对性状之间的预期协方差尚未明确表示。因此,对双定义数据的分析采用了未经检验的非独立性的变通方法,而不是直接的谱系对协方差模型,其后果尚未探索。在这里,我们考虑类群之间的进化亲缘关系如何转化为分类对之间的非独立性。我们开发的模型,其中系统发育信号在一个潜在的性状产生协方差对谱系对性状之间。我们将所得到的谱系对协方差矩阵纳入改良版的系统发育广义最小二乘和针对有界响应变量的新的系统发育β回归。在模拟测试中,这两种方法都优于以前的方法。我们发现,一种常见的启发式方法,即节点平均,对模型性能的影响比它旨在纠正的非独立性更大。我们重新分析了两个经验数据集,发现模型拟合的显著改善,并且在鸟类杂交数据的情况下,配对年龄和RI之间的关系比未经校正的分析显示的更强。我们最后提出了一个新工具,R包系统对,它允许经验主义者以一种统计上稳健且更直接实现的方式测试成对定义变量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The comparative analysis of lineage-pair traits.

For many questions in ecology and evolution, the most relevant data to consider are attributes of lineage pairs. Comparative tests for causal relationships among traits like 'diet niche overlap', 'divergence time', and 'strength of reproductive isolation (RI)' - measured for pairwise combinations of related species or populations - have led to several groundbreaking insights, but the correct statistical approach for these analyses has never been clear. Lineage-pair traits are non-independent, but unlike the expected covariance among species' traits, which is captured by a phylogenetic covariance matrix arising from a given model, the expected covariance among lineage-pair traits has not been explicitly formulated. Analyses of pairwise-defined data have thus employed untested workarounds for non-independence rather than direct models of lineage-pair covariance, with consequences that are unexplored. Here, we consider how evolutionary relatedness among taxa translates into non-independence among taxonomic pairs. We develop models by which phylogenetic signal in an underlying character generates covariance among pairs in a lineage-pair trait. We incorporate the resulting lineage-pair covariance matrices into modified versions of phylogenetic generalized least squares and a new phylogenetic beta regression for bounded response variables. Both outperform previous approaches in simulation tests. We find that a common heuristic method, node averaging, imparts a greater cost to model performance than does the non-independence it was designed to correct. We re-analyze two empirical datasets to find dramatic improvements in model fit and, in the case of avian hybridization data, an even stronger relationship between pair age and RI than is revealed from uncorrected analysis. We finally present a new tool, the R package phylopairs, that allows empiricists to test relationships among pairwise-defined variables in a way that is statistically robust and more straightforward to implement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信