[他汀类药物治疗勃起功能障碍:综述]。

Q4 Medicine
中华男科学杂志 Pub Date : 2025-07-01
Ze Li, Pei-Hai Zhang, Mei-Jun Liu, Tao Zhang
{"title":"[他汀类药物治疗勃起功能障碍:综述]。","authors":"Ze Li, Pei-Hai Zhang, Mei-Jun Liu, Tao Zhang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to re-evaluate the systematic reviews and meta-analyses on statins for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and construct an umbrella review, thereby providing robust evidence-based for the clinical application of statins in ED treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, WOS, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to September 12, 2024, for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing statin interventions in ED. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of the included studies were assessed and summarized using PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 2, and GRADE systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. According to the AMSTAR 2 evaluation, one paper was rated as low quality, while the remaining three were classified as very low quality. PRISMA 2020 evaluation results indicated that the average score of the four included studies was 29, with all being of medium quality but exhibiting partial deficiencies. The proportion of fully consistent items across the four studies ranged from 52.38% to 80.95%. GRADE system tool evaluation revealed 11 outcome indicators, of which only one was rated as intermediate evidence. The remainders were categorized as low or very low evidence, with no high-quality evidence identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Statins demonstrate efficacy in treating ED. However, the current quality of relevant systematic reviews is suboptimal, with notable deficiencies in methodological, reporting, and evidential quality. Further high-quality studies are warranted to provide more reliable evidence-based medical guidance for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":24012,"journal":{"name":"中华男科学杂志","volume":"31 7","pages":"637-644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Statin drugs for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: An umbrella review].\",\"authors\":\"Ze Li, Pei-Hai Zhang, Mei-Jun Liu, Tao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to re-evaluate the systematic reviews and meta-analyses on statins for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and construct an umbrella review, thereby providing robust evidence-based for the clinical application of statins in ED treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, WOS, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to September 12, 2024, for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing statin interventions in ED. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of the included studies were assessed and summarized using PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 2, and GRADE systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. According to the AMSTAR 2 evaluation, one paper was rated as low quality, while the remaining three were classified as very low quality. PRISMA 2020 evaluation results indicated that the average score of the four included studies was 29, with all being of medium quality but exhibiting partial deficiencies. The proportion of fully consistent items across the four studies ranged from 52.38% to 80.95%. GRADE system tool evaluation revealed 11 outcome indicators, of which only one was rated as intermediate evidence. The remainders were categorized as low or very low evidence, with no high-quality evidence identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Statins demonstrate efficacy in treating ED. However, the current quality of relevant systematic reviews is suboptimal, with notable deficiencies in methodological, reporting, and evidential quality. Further high-quality studies are warranted to provide more reliable evidence-based medical guidance for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华男科学杂志\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"637-644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华男科学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华男科学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在重新评价他汀类药物治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的系统评价和荟萃分析,构建一个总括性综述,从而为他汀类药物在ED治疗中的临床应用提供有力的循证证据。方法:全面计算机检索中国知网、万方数据库、VIP、WOS、Embase、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆数据库,从数据库建立到2024年9月12日,检索所有涉及他汀类药物干预ED的系统综述和荟萃分析。使用PRISMA 2020、AMSTAR 2和GRADE系统评估和总结纳入研究的方学质量、报告质量和证据质量。结果:纳入了四项系统综述和荟萃分析。根据AMSTAR 2评估,1篇论文被评为低质量,其余3篇被评为非常低质量。PRISMA 2020评价结果显示,纳入的4项研究平均得分为29分,均为中等质量,但存在部分不足。四项研究中完全一致条目的比例为52.38% ~ 80.95%。GRADE系统工具评价显示了11个结果指标,其中只有一个被评为中间证据。其余的被归类为低证据或极低证据,没有发现高质量的证据。结论:他汀类药物治疗ED有效。然而,目前相关系统评价的质量并不理想,在方法学、报告和证据质量方面存在明显缺陷。有必要进一步开展高质量的研究,为临床实践提供更可靠的循证医学指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Statin drugs for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: An umbrella review].

Objective: The aim of this study is to re-evaluate the systematic reviews and meta-analyses on statins for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and construct an umbrella review, thereby providing robust evidence-based for the clinical application of statins in ED treatment.

Methods: A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, WOS, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to September 12, 2024, for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing statin interventions in ED. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of the included studies were assessed and summarized using PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 2, and GRADE systems.

Results: Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. According to the AMSTAR 2 evaluation, one paper was rated as low quality, while the remaining three were classified as very low quality. PRISMA 2020 evaluation results indicated that the average score of the four included studies was 29, with all being of medium quality but exhibiting partial deficiencies. The proportion of fully consistent items across the four studies ranged from 52.38% to 80.95%. GRADE system tool evaluation revealed 11 outcome indicators, of which only one was rated as intermediate evidence. The remainders were categorized as low or very low evidence, with no high-quality evidence identified.

Conclusion: Statins demonstrate efficacy in treating ED. However, the current quality of relevant systematic reviews is suboptimal, with notable deficiencies in methodological, reporting, and evidential quality. Further high-quality studies are warranted to provide more reliable evidence-based medical guidance for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华男科学杂志
中华男科学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5367
期刊介绍: National journal of andrology was founded in June 1995. It is a core journal of andrology and reproductive medicine, published monthly, and is publicly distributed at home and abroad. The main columns include expert talks, monographs (basic research, clinical research, evidence-based medicine, traditional Chinese medicine), reviews, clinical experience exchanges, case reports, etc. Priority is given to various fund-funded projects, especially the 12th Five-Year National Support Plan and the National Natural Science Foundation funded projects. This journal is included in about 20 domestic databases, including the National Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Journal (China Science and Technology Core Journal), the Source Journal of the China Science Citation Database, the Statistical Source Journal of the China Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database (CAJCED), the Full-text Collection Journal of the China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), the Overview of the Chinese Core Journals (2017 Edition), and the Source Journal of the Top Academic Papers of China's Fine Science and Technology Journals (F5000). It has been included in the full text of the American Chemical Abstracts, the American MEDLINE, the American EBSCO, and the database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信