美国军事人员使用军事急性脑震荡评估2 (MACE 2)截止点进行前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)的假阳性率及相关因素

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karen H Lambert, Carrie W Hoppes, Aaron J Zynda, Anne Mucha, Katrina Monti, Michael W Collins, Shawn R Eagle, Anthony P Kontos
{"title":"美国军事人员使用军事急性脑震荡评估2 (MACE 2)截止点进行前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)的假阳性率及相关因素","authors":"Karen H Lambert, Carrie W Hoppes, Aaron J Zynda, Anne Mucha, Katrina Monti, Michael W Collins, Shawn R Eagle, Anthony P Kontos","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined false-positive rates and associated factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) in healthy US Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) personnel using the symptom provocation cutoff of ≥1 for any VOMS item as recommended in the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Military site.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Active-duty USASOC personnel aged 18 to 40 years with 20/20 vision, no duty limitations, and no recent concussion. Participants were excluded if they had a history of vestibular or neurologic disorder, only monocular vision capabilities, or previous moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Four hundred and sixteen USASOC personnel were enrolled; 402 were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of diagnostic accuracy. Trained research personnel administered the VOMS. Participants and research personnel were not blinded.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>False-positive rates and associated risk factors on the VOMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 402 healthy participants (mean age 28.5 ± 5.7 years), 35.1% had at least one false positive on the VOMS. Twenty-two percent had at least one false-positive change score, 12.2% had a near-point convergence (NPC) distance ≥5 cm, and 4.2% had both. VOMS false positives on each VOMS item ranged from 4.7% to 15.7%. Participants with ≥1 false positive on the VOMS were more likely to have a motion sickness history (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.35-4.12, P = .003) or a concussion history (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.27-3.05, P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MACE 2 cutoff resulted in a higher overall rate of at least one false positive across items (35.1%) in this sample of healthy USASOC personnel compared to prior total score cutoffs. Consistent with previous research, a history of motion sickness or concussion was associated with an increased likelihood of false positives. Multivariate predictors included motion sickness and a history of concussion. Military medical providers should consider motion sickness, history of concussion, and performance on individual VOMS items.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"False-Positive Rates and Associated Factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) Using the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2) Cutoffs in U.S. Military Personnel.\",\"authors\":\"Karen H Lambert, Carrie W Hoppes, Aaron J Zynda, Anne Mucha, Katrina Monti, Michael W Collins, Shawn R Eagle, Anthony P Kontos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined false-positive rates and associated factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) in healthy US Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) personnel using the symptom provocation cutoff of ≥1 for any VOMS item as recommended in the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Military site.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Active-duty USASOC personnel aged 18 to 40 years with 20/20 vision, no duty limitations, and no recent concussion. Participants were excluded if they had a history of vestibular or neurologic disorder, only monocular vision capabilities, or previous moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Four hundred and sixteen USASOC personnel were enrolled; 402 were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of diagnostic accuracy. Trained research personnel administered the VOMS. Participants and research personnel were not blinded.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>False-positive rates and associated risk factors on the VOMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 402 healthy participants (mean age 28.5 ± 5.7 years), 35.1% had at least one false positive on the VOMS. Twenty-two percent had at least one false-positive change score, 12.2% had a near-point convergence (NPC) distance ≥5 cm, and 4.2% had both. VOMS false positives on each VOMS item ranged from 4.7% to 15.7%. Participants with ≥1 false positive on the VOMS were more likely to have a motion sickness history (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.35-4.12, P = .003) or a concussion history (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.27-3.05, P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MACE 2 cutoff resulted in a higher overall rate of at least one false positive across items (35.1%) in this sample of healthy USASOC personnel compared to prior total score cutoffs. Consistent with previous research, a history of motion sickness or concussion was associated with an increased likelihood of false positives. Multivariate predictors included motion sickness and a history of concussion. Military medical providers should consider motion sickness, history of concussion, and performance on individual VOMS items.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究采用军事急性脑震荡评估2 (MACE 2)中建议的前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)任一项目的症状激发临界值≥1,检查美国陆军特种作战司令部(USASOC)健康人员前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)的假阳性率及其相关因素。背景:军事基地。参与者:美国奥委会现役人员,年龄18 - 40岁,视力20/20,无任务限制,近期无脑震荡。如果参与者有前庭或神经障碍病史,只有单眼视力,或以前有中度至重度创伤性脑损伤,则排除在外。416名美国奥委会人员被录取;402例进行分析。设计:这是一项诊断准确性的横断面研究。训练有素的研究人员管理VOMS。参与者和研究人员没有被蒙蔽。主要指标:VOMS的假阳性率及相关危险因素。结果:402名健康参与者(平均年龄28.5±5.7岁)中,有35.1%的人在VOMS上至少出现一次假阳性。22%的患者至少有一个假阳性变化评分,12.2%的患者近点收敛(NPC)距离≥5 cm, 4.2%的患者两者都有。VOMS各项目的假阳性值在4.7% ~ 15.7%之间。VOMS假阳性≥1的受试者更有可能有晕动病史(OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.35-4.12, P = 0.003)或脑震荡史(OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.27-3.05, P = 0.002)。结论:与之前的总分截止值相比,MACE 2截止值导致USASOC健康人员样本中至少一个假阳性的总体比率(35.1%)更高。与之前的研究一致,晕动病或脑震荡的病史与假阳性的可能性增加有关。多变量预测因素包括晕车和脑震荡史。军事医疗服务提供者应考虑晕动病、脑震荡史和个人VOMS项目的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
False-Positive Rates and Associated Factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) Using the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2) Cutoffs in U.S. Military Personnel.

Objective: This study examined false-positive rates and associated factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) in healthy US Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) personnel using the symptom provocation cutoff of ≥1 for any VOMS item as recommended in the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2).

Setting: Military site.

Participants: Active-duty USASOC personnel aged 18 to 40 years with 20/20 vision, no duty limitations, and no recent concussion. Participants were excluded if they had a history of vestibular or neurologic disorder, only monocular vision capabilities, or previous moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Four hundred and sixteen USASOC personnel were enrolled; 402 were analyzed.

Design: This was a cross-sectional study of diagnostic accuracy. Trained research personnel administered the VOMS. Participants and research personnel were not blinded.

Main measures: False-positive rates and associated risk factors on the VOMS.

Results: Among 402 healthy participants (mean age 28.5 ± 5.7 years), 35.1% had at least one false positive on the VOMS. Twenty-two percent had at least one false-positive change score, 12.2% had a near-point convergence (NPC) distance ≥5 cm, and 4.2% had both. VOMS false positives on each VOMS item ranged from 4.7% to 15.7%. Participants with ≥1 false positive on the VOMS were more likely to have a motion sickness history (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.35-4.12, P = .003) or a concussion history (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.27-3.05, P = .002).

Conclusion: The MACE 2 cutoff resulted in a higher overall rate of at least one false positive across items (35.1%) in this sample of healthy USASOC personnel compared to prior total score cutoffs. Consistent with previous research, a history of motion sickness or concussion was associated with an increased likelihood of false positives. Multivariate predictors included motion sickness and a history of concussion. Military medical providers should consider motion sickness, history of concussion, and performance on individual VOMS items.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信