十年的互动式教育交流:影响专业间的姑息治疗教育。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Laura J Morrison, Shirley Otis-Green, Julie Bruno, Pamela N Fordham, Elise C Carey
{"title":"十年的互动式教育交流:影响专业间的姑息治疗教育。","authors":"Laura J Morrison, Shirley Otis-Green, Julie Bruno, Pamela N Fordham, Elise C Carey","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interprofessional clinical practice model is arguably the most impactful and generative aspect of hospice and palliative care (HPC) clinical practice. This article describes the innovative, shared interprofessional leadership model, andragogical infrastructure, program development, educational impact, and critical lessons from the Interactive Educational Exchange (IEE). In response to a deficit in interprofessional HPC educational opportunities for rapid scholarship dissemination and mentorship, interprofessional leaders from medicine, social work and nursing proposed and implemented the IEE at the Annual Assembly of Hospice and Palliative Care presented by the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association from 2010 to 2020. The reported outcome measures for interprofessional scholarship and engagement, session evaluations, and attendance demonstrate why this successful innovation was repeated annually for over a decade pre-COVID. Scholarship dissemination was rapid, with robust community engagement, inclusive of multiple professional disciplines over time. Indeed, the IEE became a step in the career trajectory of many interprofessional HPC clinician-educators during that decade. The highlighted lessons around vision, structure, and community leave us with an IEE model that can be flexibly adapted to other settings. In championing the interprofessional HPC clinical model forward to achieve the highest quality of care for our patients, we recommend prioritizing intentional models to promote and support interprofessional HPC educators in dissemination of scholarship, collaborative mentorship, and community building so all can thrive.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Decade of Interactive Educational Exchange: Impacting Interprofessional Palliative Care Education.\",\"authors\":\"Laura J Morrison, Shirley Otis-Green, Julie Bruno, Pamela N Fordham, Elise C Carey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The interprofessional clinical practice model is arguably the most impactful and generative aspect of hospice and palliative care (HPC) clinical practice. This article describes the innovative, shared interprofessional leadership model, andragogical infrastructure, program development, educational impact, and critical lessons from the Interactive Educational Exchange (IEE). In response to a deficit in interprofessional HPC educational opportunities for rapid scholarship dissemination and mentorship, interprofessional leaders from medicine, social work and nursing proposed and implemented the IEE at the Annual Assembly of Hospice and Palliative Care presented by the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association from 2010 to 2020. The reported outcome measures for interprofessional scholarship and engagement, session evaluations, and attendance demonstrate why this successful innovation was repeated annually for over a decade pre-COVID. Scholarship dissemination was rapid, with robust community engagement, inclusive of multiple professional disciplines over time. Indeed, the IEE became a step in the career trajectory of many interprofessional HPC clinician-educators during that decade. The highlighted lessons around vision, structure, and community leave us with an IEE model that can be flexibly adapted to other settings. In championing the interprofessional HPC clinical model forward to achieve the highest quality of care for our patients, we recommend prioritizing intentional models to promote and support interprofessional HPC educators in dissemination of scholarship, collaborative mentorship, and community building so all can thrive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨专业临床实践模式可以说是最具影响力和生成方面的临终关怀和姑息治疗(HPC)临床实践。本文描述了创新的共享跨专业领导模式、教学基础设施、项目开发、教育影响以及互动式教育交流(IEE)的重要经验教训。为了应对HPC跨专业教育机会的短缺,快速传播奖学金和指导,来自医学、社会工作和护理的跨专业领导在2010-2020年由美国临终关怀与姑息医学学会和临终关怀与姑息护士协会举办的临终关怀与姑息护理年会上提出并实施了IEE。报告的跨专业奖学金和参与、会议评估和出席率的结果衡量指标表明,为什么在covid之前的十多年里,这一成功的创新每年都在重复。随着时间的推移,奖学金传播迅速,社区参与活跃,包括多个专业学科。事实上,在那十年中,IEE成为许多跨专业HPC临床教育者职业轨迹中的一步。围绕愿景、结构和社区的突出教训给我们留下了一个可以灵活地适应其他环境的IEE模型。为了支持跨专业HPC临床模式,为患者提供最高质量的护理,我们建议优先考虑有意模式,以促进和支持跨专业HPC教育者传播奖学金,合作指导和社区建设,使所有人都能茁壮成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Decade of Interactive Educational Exchange: Impacting Interprofessional Palliative Care Education.

The interprofessional clinical practice model is arguably the most impactful and generative aspect of hospice and palliative care (HPC) clinical practice. This article describes the innovative, shared interprofessional leadership model, andragogical infrastructure, program development, educational impact, and critical lessons from the Interactive Educational Exchange (IEE). In response to a deficit in interprofessional HPC educational opportunities for rapid scholarship dissemination and mentorship, interprofessional leaders from medicine, social work and nursing proposed and implemented the IEE at the Annual Assembly of Hospice and Palliative Care presented by the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association from 2010 to 2020. The reported outcome measures for interprofessional scholarship and engagement, session evaluations, and attendance demonstrate why this successful innovation was repeated annually for over a decade pre-COVID. Scholarship dissemination was rapid, with robust community engagement, inclusive of multiple professional disciplines over time. Indeed, the IEE became a step in the career trajectory of many interprofessional HPC clinician-educators during that decade. The highlighted lessons around vision, structure, and community leave us with an IEE model that can be flexibly adapted to other settings. In championing the interprofessional HPC clinical model forward to achieve the highest quality of care for our patients, we recommend prioritizing intentional models to promote and support interprofessional HPC educators in dissemination of scholarship, collaborative mentorship, and community building so all can thrive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信