质量问题:高质量早期姑息治疗对晚期癌症的影响。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
EunKyo Kang, Su-Jin Koh, Jung Hun Kang, Yu Jung Kim, Seyoung Seo, Jung Hoon Kim, Jaekyung Cheon, Eun Joo Kang, Eun-Kee Song, Eun Mi Nam, Ho-Suk Oh, Hye Jin Choi, Jung Hye Kwon, Woo Kyun Bae, Jeong Eun Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, Young Ho Yun
{"title":"质量问题:高质量早期姑息治疗对晚期癌症的影响。","authors":"EunKyo Kang, Su-Jin Koh, Jung Hun Kang, Yu Jung Kim, Seyoung Seo, Jung Hoon Kim, Jaekyung Cheon, Eun Joo Kang, Eun-Kee Song, Eun Mi Nam, Ho-Suk Oh, Hye Jin Choi, Jung Hye Kwon, Woo Kyun Bae, Jeong Eun Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, Young Ho Yun","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Early palliative care (EPC) is an integral treatment for advanced cancer patients, improving quality of life and symptom management, but the impact of its quality on outcomes is less understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to quantify the quality of EPC and analyze its longitudinal association with depression levels, quality of life (QoL), patient survival, and self-management strategies in patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis included 144 advanced cancer patients from a randomized controlled trial in South Korea. Participants were stratified into high-quality (N = 76) and low-quality (N = 68) EPC groups based on Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care scores. Outcomes including QoL (McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), depression (PHQ-9), and self-management strategies (SMASH Assessment Tool Short Form) were assessed at baseline, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Two-year overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, while repeated measures used generalized estimating equations and linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high-quality EPC group demonstrated a significantly lower prevalence of depression at 24 weeks (14.7% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.036) and a higher 2-year survival rate (P = 0.006) compared to the low-quality group. Significant improvements were observed in existential and social burden (MQOL) and self-management preparation and implementation strategies (SAT-SF) at 18 and 24 weeks in the high-quality EPC group. Overall QoL measured by EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL showed minimal group differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of EPC services significantly impacts depression, patient survival, aspects of QoL, and self-management capabilities. These findings emphasize the importance of high-quality EPC beyond mere provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Matters: Effect of High-Quality Early Palliative Care in Advanced Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"EunKyo Kang, Su-Jin Koh, Jung Hun Kang, Yu Jung Kim, Seyoung Seo, Jung Hoon Kim, Jaekyung Cheon, Eun Joo Kang, Eun-Kee Song, Eun Mi Nam, Ho-Suk Oh, Hye Jin Choi, Jung Hye Kwon, Woo Kyun Bae, Jeong Eun Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, Young Ho Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Early palliative care (EPC) is an integral treatment for advanced cancer patients, improving quality of life and symptom management, but the impact of its quality on outcomes is less understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to quantify the quality of EPC and analyze its longitudinal association with depression levels, quality of life (QoL), patient survival, and self-management strategies in patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis included 144 advanced cancer patients from a randomized controlled trial in South Korea. Participants were stratified into high-quality (N = 76) and low-quality (N = 68) EPC groups based on Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care scores. Outcomes including QoL (McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), depression (PHQ-9), and self-management strategies (SMASH Assessment Tool Short Form) were assessed at baseline, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Two-year overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, while repeated measures used generalized estimating equations and linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high-quality EPC group demonstrated a significantly lower prevalence of depression at 24 weeks (14.7% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.036) and a higher 2-year survival rate (P = 0.006) compared to the low-quality group. Significant improvements were observed in existential and social burden (MQOL) and self-management preparation and implementation strategies (SAT-SF) at 18 and 24 weeks in the high-quality EPC group. Overall QoL measured by EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL showed minimal group differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of EPC services significantly impacts depression, patient survival, aspects of QoL, and self-management capabilities. These findings emphasize the importance of high-quality EPC beyond mere provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期姑息治疗(EPC)是晚期癌症患者的一种整体治疗方法,可改善生活质量和症状管理,但其质量对预后的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在量化EPC质量,并分析其与晚期癌症患者抑郁水平、生活质量(QoL)、患者生存和自我管理策略的纵向关联。方法:这项二次分析纳入了144名来自韩国随机对照试验的晚期癌症患者。根据质量护理问卷-姑息治疗评分将参与者分为高质量(N=76)和低质量(N=68) EPC组。结果包括QoL (McGill生活质量问卷,EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL),抑郁(PHQ-9)和自我管理策略(SMASH评估工具短表)在基线,12,18和24周进行评估。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线和log-rank检验分析两年总生存率,而重复测量使用广义估计方程和线性混合效应模型。结果:与低质量EPC组相比,高质量EPC组在24周时抑郁症患病率明显降低(14.7% vs. 39.1%, p=0.036), 2年生存率更高(p=0.006)。在18周和24周,高质量EPC组在存在和社会负担(MQOL)和自我管理准备和实施策略(SAT-SF)方面观察到显著改善。EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL测量的总体生活质量组间差异极小。结论:EPC服务质量对抑郁、患者生存、生活质量和自我管理能力有显著影响。这些发现强调了高质量EPC的重要性,而不仅仅是提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Matters: Effect of High-Quality Early Palliative Care in Advanced Cancer.

Context: Early palliative care (EPC) is an integral treatment for advanced cancer patients, improving quality of life and symptom management, but the impact of its quality on outcomes is less understood.

Objectives: This study aimed to quantify the quality of EPC and analyze its longitudinal association with depression levels, quality of life (QoL), patient survival, and self-management strategies in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: This secondary analysis included 144 advanced cancer patients from a randomized controlled trial in South Korea. Participants were stratified into high-quality (N = 76) and low-quality (N = 68) EPC groups based on Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care scores. Outcomes including QoL (McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), depression (PHQ-9), and self-management strategies (SMASH Assessment Tool Short Form) were assessed at baseline, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Two-year overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, while repeated measures used generalized estimating equations and linear mixed-effects models.

Results: The high-quality EPC group demonstrated a significantly lower prevalence of depression at 24 weeks (14.7% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.036) and a higher 2-year survival rate (P = 0.006) compared to the low-quality group. Significant improvements were observed in existential and social burden (MQOL) and self-management preparation and implementation strategies (SAT-SF) at 18 and 24 weeks in the high-quality EPC group. Overall QoL measured by EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL showed minimal group differences.

Conclusion: The quality of EPC services significantly impacts depression, patient survival, aspects of QoL, and self-management capabilities. These findings emphasize the importance of high-quality EPC beyond mere provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信