Sarah C. Lotspeich , Sheetal Kedar , Rabeya Tahir , Aidan D. Keleghan , Amelia Miranda , Stephany N. Duda , Michael P. Bancks , Brian J. Wells , Ashish K. Khanna , Joseph Rigdon
{"title":"通过丰富的验证和有针对性的抽样来克服数据挑战,以测量电子健康记录中的整个人的健康。","authors":"Sarah C. Lotspeich , Sheetal Kedar , Rabeya Tahir , Aidan D. Keleghan , Amelia Miranda , Stephany N. Duda , Michael P. Bancks , Brian J. Wells , Ashish K. Khanna , Joseph Rigdon","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The allostatic load index (ALI) is a 10-component composite measure of whole-person health, which reflects the multiple interrelated physiological regulatory systems that underlie healthy functioning. Data from electronic health records (EHR) present a huge opportunity to operationalize the ALI in learning health systems; however, these data are prone to missingness and errors. Validation (e.g., through chart reviews) can provide better-quality data, but realistically, only a subset of patients’ data can be validated, and most protocols do not recover missing data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Using a representative sample of 1000 patients from the EHR at an extensive learning health system (100 of whom could be validated), we propose methods to design, conduct, and analyze statistically efficient and robust studies of ALI and healthcare utilization. Employing semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation, we robustly incorporate all available patient information into statistical models. Using targeted design strategies, we examine ways to select the most informative patients for validation. Incorporating clinical expertise, we devise a novel validation protocol to promote EHR data quality and completeness.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Chart reviews uncovered few errors (99% matched source documents) and recovered some missing data through auxiliary information in patients’ charts. On average, validation increased the number of non-missing ALI components per patient from 6 to 7. Through simulations based on preliminary data, residual sampling was identified as the most informative strategy for completing our validation study. Incorporating validation data, statistical models indicated that worse whole-person health (higher ALI) was associated with higher odds of engaging in the healthcare system, adjusting for age.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Targeted validation with an enriched protocol can ensure the quality and promote the completeness of EHR data. Findings from our validation study were incorporated into analyses as we operationalize the ALI as a scalable whole-person health measure that predicts healthcare utilization in the learning health system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 104904"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming data challenges through enriched validation and targeted sampling to measure whole-person health in electronic health records\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C. Lotspeich , Sheetal Kedar , Rabeya Tahir , Aidan D. Keleghan , Amelia Miranda , Stephany N. Duda , Michael P. Bancks , Brian J. Wells , Ashish K. Khanna , Joseph Rigdon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The allostatic load index (ALI) is a 10-component composite measure of whole-person health, which reflects the multiple interrelated physiological regulatory systems that underlie healthy functioning. Data from electronic health records (EHR) present a huge opportunity to operationalize the ALI in learning health systems; however, these data are prone to missingness and errors. Validation (e.g., through chart reviews) can provide better-quality data, but realistically, only a subset of patients’ data can be validated, and most protocols do not recover missing data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Using a representative sample of 1000 patients from the EHR at an extensive learning health system (100 of whom could be validated), we propose methods to design, conduct, and analyze statistically efficient and robust studies of ALI and healthcare utilization. Employing semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation, we robustly incorporate all available patient information into statistical models. Using targeted design strategies, we examine ways to select the most informative patients for validation. Incorporating clinical expertise, we devise a novel validation protocol to promote EHR data quality and completeness.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Chart reviews uncovered few errors (99% matched source documents) and recovered some missing data through auxiliary information in patients’ charts. On average, validation increased the number of non-missing ALI components per patient from 6 to 7. Through simulations based on preliminary data, residual sampling was identified as the most informative strategy for completing our validation study. Incorporating validation data, statistical models indicated that worse whole-person health (higher ALI) was associated with higher odds of engaging in the healthcare system, adjusting for age.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Targeted validation with an enriched protocol can ensure the quality and promote the completeness of EHR data. Findings from our validation study were incorporated into analyses as we operationalize the ALI as a scalable whole-person health measure that predicts healthcare utilization in the learning health system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001339\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Overcoming data challenges through enriched validation and targeted sampling to measure whole-person health in electronic health records
Objective:
The allostatic load index (ALI) is a 10-component composite measure of whole-person health, which reflects the multiple interrelated physiological regulatory systems that underlie healthy functioning. Data from electronic health records (EHR) present a huge opportunity to operationalize the ALI in learning health systems; however, these data are prone to missingness and errors. Validation (e.g., through chart reviews) can provide better-quality data, but realistically, only a subset of patients’ data can be validated, and most protocols do not recover missing data.
Methods:
Using a representative sample of 1000 patients from the EHR at an extensive learning health system (100 of whom could be validated), we propose methods to design, conduct, and analyze statistically efficient and robust studies of ALI and healthcare utilization. Employing semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation, we robustly incorporate all available patient information into statistical models. Using targeted design strategies, we examine ways to select the most informative patients for validation. Incorporating clinical expertise, we devise a novel validation protocol to promote EHR data quality and completeness.
Results:
Chart reviews uncovered few errors (99% matched source documents) and recovered some missing data through auxiliary information in patients’ charts. On average, validation increased the number of non-missing ALI components per patient from 6 to 7. Through simulations based on preliminary data, residual sampling was identified as the most informative strategy for completing our validation study. Incorporating validation data, statistical models indicated that worse whole-person health (higher ALI) was associated with higher odds of engaging in the healthcare system, adjusting for age.
Conclusion:
Targeted validation with an enriched protocol can ensure the quality and promote the completeness of EHR data. Findings from our validation study were incorporated into analyses as we operationalize the ALI as a scalable whole-person health measure that predicts healthcare utilization in the learning health system.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.