{"title":"EDTA锁溶液在预防导管相关血流感染或中心静脉相关血流感染中的作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Sayan Chakraborty, Sanjay Bhattacharya, Abhinaba Ghosh, Soumyadip Chatterji","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) or central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) occur frequently with long-term indwelling catheters. EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and other catheter lock solutions can prevent CRBSI/CLABSI. This study aimed to identify the role of EDTA lock solution in preventing CRBSI/CLABSI compared to the non-EDTA lock solutions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eligible studies comparing the effectiveness of EDTA versus a control group on averting CRBSI or CLABSI were identified through searches across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The secondary outcomes were catheter colonization, catheter survival, and catheter thrombosis. The relative risk for all the outcomes was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included eight studies (403 EDTA vs 425 control patients) and demonstrated a significant reduction in CRBSI/CLABSI with EDTA (15 vs 71 events; RR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.10-0.33; <i>P</i> < 0.00001). Catheter colonization also decreased significantly (8 vs 38 events; OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.05-0.29). EDTA improved catheter survival in hemodialysis patients (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.23-11.61; <i>P</i> < 0.02) but showed no significant effect on thrombolytic treatment or all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses supported these findings, with no publication bias detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EDTA significantly reduces CRBSI/CLABSI and catheter colonization, improves catheter survival, but does not affect thrombolytic treatment or mortality. Evidence certainty varies across outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of EDTA lock solution in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections or central line-associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sayan Chakraborty, Sanjay Bhattacharya, Abhinaba Ghosh, Soumyadip Chatterji\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2025.10246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) or central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) occur frequently with long-term indwelling catheters. EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and other catheter lock solutions can prevent CRBSI/CLABSI. This study aimed to identify the role of EDTA lock solution in preventing CRBSI/CLABSI compared to the non-EDTA lock solutions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eligible studies comparing the effectiveness of EDTA versus a control group on averting CRBSI or CLABSI were identified through searches across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The secondary outcomes were catheter colonization, catheter survival, and catheter thrombosis. The relative risk for all the outcomes was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included eight studies (403 EDTA vs 425 control patients) and demonstrated a significant reduction in CRBSI/CLABSI with EDTA (15 vs 71 events; RR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.10-0.33; <i>P</i> < 0.00001). Catheter colonization also decreased significantly (8 vs 38 events; OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.05-0.29). EDTA improved catheter survival in hemodialysis patients (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.23-11.61; <i>P</i> < 0.02) but showed no significant effect on thrombolytic treatment or all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses supported these findings, with no publication bias detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EDTA significantly reduces CRBSI/CLABSI and catheter colonization, improves catheter survival, but does not affect thrombolytic treatment or mortality. Evidence certainty varies across outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10246\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)或中央线相关性血流感染(CLABSI)在长期留置导管中经常发生。EDTA(乙二胺四乙酸)等导管锁液可预防CRBSI/CLABSI。本研究旨在确定EDTA锁固溶液与非EDTA锁固溶液相比在预防CRBSI/CLABSI中的作用。材料和方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane CENTRAL、medRxiv、bioRxiv和ClinicalTrials.gov,确定了EDTA与对照组在避免CRBSI或CLABSI方面的有效性比较的合格研究。次要结果是导管定植、导管存活和导管血栓形成。计算所有结果的相对风险。结果:该荟萃分析包括8项研究(403例EDTA vs 425例对照患者),并显示EDTA显著降低CRBSI/CLABSI(15例vs 71例;RR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.10-0.33; P < 0.00001)。导管定植也显著减少(8 vs 38个事件;OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.05-0.29)。EDTA改善了血液透析患者的导管生存(OR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.23-11.61; P < 0.02),但对溶栓治疗或全因死亡率无显著影响。亚组分析支持这些发现,未发现发表偏倚。结论:EDTA可显著降低CRBSI/CLABSI和导管定殖,提高导管存活率,但不影响溶栓治疗或死亡率。证据确定性因结果而异。
Role of EDTA lock solution in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections or central line-associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) or central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) occur frequently with long-term indwelling catheters. EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and other catheter lock solutions can prevent CRBSI/CLABSI. This study aimed to identify the role of EDTA lock solution in preventing CRBSI/CLABSI compared to the non-EDTA lock solutions.
Materials and methods: Eligible studies comparing the effectiveness of EDTA versus a control group on averting CRBSI or CLABSI were identified through searches across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The secondary outcomes were catheter colonization, catheter survival, and catheter thrombosis. The relative risk for all the outcomes was calculated.
Results: This meta-analysis included eight studies (403 EDTA vs 425 control patients) and demonstrated a significant reduction in CRBSI/CLABSI with EDTA (15 vs 71 events; RR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.10-0.33; P < 0.00001). Catheter colonization also decreased significantly (8 vs 38 events; OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.05-0.29). EDTA improved catheter survival in hemodialysis patients (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.23-11.61; P < 0.02) but showed no significant effect on thrombolytic treatment or all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses supported these findings, with no publication bias detected.
Conclusion: EDTA significantly reduces CRBSI/CLABSI and catheter colonization, improves catheter survival, but does not affect thrombolytic treatment or mortality. Evidence certainty varies across outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.