Jonathan Dos Santos, José Ribeiro, Francisco R Gonçalves, Alexandra Gonçalves
{"title":"在初级保健中,即时超声对心力衰竭患者的诊断有重要作用。","authors":"Jonathan Dos Santos, José Ribeiro, Francisco R Gonçalves, Alexandra Gonçalves","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare centers (PHC) play a pivotal role in the first-line management of patients with diabetes and hypertension, major risk factors for heart failure (HF) development. Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound (POCUS), integrated as an extension of the physical examination, holds significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in this setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the impact of POCUS on clinical decision-making in patients with HF and at risk of developing HF in PHC and compare POCUS findings with clinical assessment alone, conventional echocardiography, and electrocardiogram results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with diabetes, hypertension, or HF symptoms at a PHC underwent POCUS by a trained family physician. The findings were compared with traditional clinical practice. Decisions regarding referral for an echocardiogram or hospital consultation were contrasted with those of two clinicians who do not use POCUS, and the investigator's echocardiographic results were compared with those from conventional echocardiography and electrocardiogram. Data were analyzed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 196 patients (66 ± 15 years; 53.6% female), 36.2% had HF symptoms, 89.2% hypertension, and 29.7% diabetes. Investigator requested less echocardiograms (44 vs. 145 and 125) and made less hospital referral (15 vs. 16 and 24). Using POCUS, congestive patients were less than expected (18 vs. 43 cases), and stage B HF patients were more than clinically (44.9% vs. 19.4%). POCUS identified more cases with left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiograms (58 vs. 10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the value of integrating POCUS into routine family physician consultations, particularly for the management of HF and effective risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care ultrasound can make the difference in patients with heart failure at primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Dos Santos, José Ribeiro, Francisco R Gonçalves, Alexandra Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmaf068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare centers (PHC) play a pivotal role in the first-line management of patients with diabetes and hypertension, major risk factors for heart failure (HF) development. Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound (POCUS), integrated as an extension of the physical examination, holds significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in this setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the impact of POCUS on clinical decision-making in patients with HF and at risk of developing HF in PHC and compare POCUS findings with clinical assessment alone, conventional echocardiography, and electrocardiogram results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with diabetes, hypertension, or HF symptoms at a PHC underwent POCUS by a trained family physician. The findings were compared with traditional clinical practice. Decisions regarding referral for an echocardiogram or hospital consultation were contrasted with those of two clinicians who do not use POCUS, and the investigator's echocardiographic results were compared with those from conventional echocardiography and electrocardiogram. Data were analyzed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 196 patients (66 ± 15 years; 53.6% female), 36.2% had HF symptoms, 89.2% hypertension, and 29.7% diabetes. Investigator requested less echocardiograms (44 vs. 145 and 125) and made less hospital referral (15 vs. 16 and 24). Using POCUS, congestive patients were less than expected (18 vs. 43 cases), and stage B HF patients were more than clinically (44.9% vs. 19.4%). POCUS identified more cases with left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiograms (58 vs. 10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the value of integrating POCUS into routine family physician consultations, particularly for the management of HF and effective risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Point-of-care ultrasound can make the difference in patients with heart failure at primary care.
Background: Primary healthcare centers (PHC) play a pivotal role in the first-line management of patients with diabetes and hypertension, major risk factors for heart failure (HF) development. Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound (POCUS), integrated as an extension of the physical examination, holds significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in this setting.
Objectives: Evaluate the impact of POCUS on clinical decision-making in patients with HF and at risk of developing HF in PHC and compare POCUS findings with clinical assessment alone, conventional echocardiography, and electrocardiogram results.
Methods: Patients with diabetes, hypertension, or HF symptoms at a PHC underwent POCUS by a trained family physician. The findings were compared with traditional clinical practice. Decisions regarding referral for an echocardiogram or hospital consultation were contrasted with those of two clinicians who do not use POCUS, and the investigator's echocardiographic results were compared with those from conventional echocardiography and electrocardiogram. Data were analyzed using SPSS.
Results: Among 196 patients (66 ± 15 years; 53.6% female), 36.2% had HF symptoms, 89.2% hypertension, and 29.7% diabetes. Investigator requested less echocardiograms (44 vs. 145 and 125) and made less hospital referral (15 vs. 16 and 24). Using POCUS, congestive patients were less than expected (18 vs. 43 cases), and stage B HF patients were more than clinically (44.9% vs. 19.4%). POCUS identified more cases with left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiograms (58 vs. 10).
Conclusion: These findings highlight the value of integrating POCUS into routine family physician consultations, particularly for the management of HF and effective risk stratification.
期刊介绍:
Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries.
Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration.
The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.