在初级保健中,即时超声对心力衰竭患者的诊断有重要作用。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jonathan Dos Santos, José Ribeiro, Francisco R Gonçalves, Alexandra Gonçalves
{"title":"在初级保健中,即时超声对心力衰竭患者的诊断有重要作用。","authors":"Jonathan Dos Santos, José Ribeiro, Francisco R Gonçalves, Alexandra Gonçalves","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare centers (PHC) play a pivotal role in the first-line management of patients with diabetes and hypertension, major risk factors for heart failure (HF) development. Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound (POCUS), integrated as an extension of the physical examination, holds significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in this setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the impact of POCUS on clinical decision-making in patients with HF and at risk of developing HF in PHC and compare POCUS findings with clinical assessment alone, conventional echocardiography, and electrocardiogram results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with diabetes, hypertension, or HF symptoms at a PHC underwent POCUS by a trained family physician. The findings were compared with traditional clinical practice. Decisions regarding referral for an echocardiogram or hospital consultation were contrasted with those of two clinicians who do not use POCUS, and the investigator's echocardiographic results were compared with those from conventional echocardiography and electrocardiogram. Data were analyzed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 196 patients (66 ± 15 years; 53.6% female), 36.2% had HF symptoms, 89.2% hypertension, and 29.7% diabetes. Investigator requested less echocardiograms (44 vs. 145 and 125) and made less hospital referral (15 vs. 16 and 24). Using POCUS, congestive patients were less than expected (18 vs. 43 cases), and stage B HF patients were more than clinically (44.9% vs. 19.4%). POCUS identified more cases with left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiograms (58 vs. 10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the value of integrating POCUS into routine family physician consultations, particularly for the management of HF and effective risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care ultrasound can make the difference in patients with heart failure at primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Dos Santos, José Ribeiro, Francisco R Gonçalves, Alexandra Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmaf068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare centers (PHC) play a pivotal role in the first-line management of patients with diabetes and hypertension, major risk factors for heart failure (HF) development. Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound (POCUS), integrated as an extension of the physical examination, holds significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in this setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the impact of POCUS on clinical decision-making in patients with HF and at risk of developing HF in PHC and compare POCUS findings with clinical assessment alone, conventional echocardiography, and electrocardiogram results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with diabetes, hypertension, or HF symptoms at a PHC underwent POCUS by a trained family physician. The findings were compared with traditional clinical practice. Decisions regarding referral for an echocardiogram or hospital consultation were contrasted with those of two clinicians who do not use POCUS, and the investigator's echocardiographic results were compared with those from conventional echocardiography and electrocardiogram. Data were analyzed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 196 patients (66 ± 15 years; 53.6% female), 36.2% had HF symptoms, 89.2% hypertension, and 29.7% diabetes. Investigator requested less echocardiograms (44 vs. 145 and 125) and made less hospital referral (15 vs. 16 and 24). Using POCUS, congestive patients were less than expected (18 vs. 43 cases), and stage B HF patients were more than clinically (44.9% vs. 19.4%). POCUS identified more cases with left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiograms (58 vs. 10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the value of integrating POCUS into routine family physician consultations, particularly for the management of HF and effective risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:初级卫生保健中心(PHC)在糖尿病和高血压患者的一线管理中起着关键作用,糖尿病和高血压是心力衰竭(HF)发展的主要危险因素。即时心脏超声(POCUS)作为身体检查的延伸,在这种情况下具有提高诊断准确性和临床管理的巨大潜力。目的:评估POCUS对心衰患者临床决策的影响,并将POCUS结果与单纯临床评估、常规超声心动图和心电图结果进行比较。方法:在PHC有糖尿病、高血压或心衰症状的患者由训练有素的家庭医生进行POCUS。结果与传统临床实践进行了比较。将两名不使用POCUS的临床医生关于转介超声心动图或医院会诊的决定进行对比,并将研究者的超声心动图结果与常规超声心动图和心电图结果进行比较。数据采用SPSS进行分析。结果:196例患者(66±15岁,女性53.6%)中有HF症状的占36.2%,高血压占89.2%,糖尿病占29.7%。研究者要求更少的超声心动图(44对145和125)和更少的医院转诊(15对16和24)。使用POCUS,充血性患者少于预期(18例对43例),B期HF患者多于临床(44.9%对19.4%)。POCUS发现的左心室肥厚病例多于心电图(58例对10例)。结论:这些发现强调了将POCUS纳入常规家庭医生咨询的价值,特别是对于HF的管理和有效的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Point-of-care ultrasound can make the difference in patients with heart failure at primary care.

Point-of-care ultrasound can make the difference in patients with heart failure at primary care.

Background: Primary healthcare centers (PHC) play a pivotal role in the first-line management of patients with diabetes and hypertension, major risk factors for heart failure (HF) development. Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound (POCUS), integrated as an extension of the physical examination, holds significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in this setting.

Objectives: Evaluate the impact of POCUS on clinical decision-making in patients with HF and at risk of developing HF in PHC and compare POCUS findings with clinical assessment alone, conventional echocardiography, and electrocardiogram results.

Methods: Patients with diabetes, hypertension, or HF symptoms at a PHC underwent POCUS by a trained family physician. The findings were compared with traditional clinical practice. Decisions regarding referral for an echocardiogram or hospital consultation were contrasted with those of two clinicians who do not use POCUS, and the investigator's echocardiographic results were compared with those from conventional echocardiography and electrocardiogram. Data were analyzed using SPSS.

Results: Among 196 patients (66 ± 15 years; 53.6% female), 36.2% had HF symptoms, 89.2% hypertension, and 29.7% diabetes. Investigator requested less echocardiograms (44 vs. 145 and 125) and made less hospital referral (15 vs. 16 and 24). Using POCUS, congestive patients were less than expected (18 vs. 43 cases), and stage B HF patients were more than clinically (44.9% vs. 19.4%). POCUS identified more cases with left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiograms (58 vs. 10).

Conclusion: These findings highlight the value of integrating POCUS into routine family physician consultations, particularly for the management of HF and effective risk stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信