通过实践反馈,肌酐清除率、肾功能降低和优化处方安全性:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Su I Wood, Robbie Foy, Paul Carder, Stella Johnson, Duncan Petty, Sarah L Alderson
{"title":"通过实践反馈,肌酐清除率、肾功能降低和优化处方安全性:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Su I Wood, Robbie Foy, Paul Carder, Stella Johnson, Duncan Petty, Sarah L Alderson","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney function declines with age, increasing risk of harm from raised blood levels of many medicines. Prescribing is often inappropriate for older people with reduced creatinine clearance (CrCl).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the feasibility and acceptability of providing performance feedback to increase CrCl calculation and coding and reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We delivered evidence-based feedback on CrCl coding and prescribing for common medicines requiring dose adjustment in renal impairment. This mixed-methods study in seven UK general practices collected data at three time points for evidence-based feedback (October 2021, December 2021, February 2022) and additionally pre-/post-feedback intervention. An institutional ethnography explored responses. We observed and conducted semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians. We thematically analysed qualitative data, guided by Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean CrCl coding for ≥75s rose from 46% to 50.4% (difference 4.4%; range -10.5% to 14.7%). The number of patients with CrCl-associated inappropriate prescribing fell. We observed in 6 settings and interviewed 11 clinicians. Feedback engaged practices, was seen as important and allowed flexible action. All feedback cycle components were evident. Participants mentioned difficulties in remembering to consider kidney function, calculating and coding CrCl, recalling relevant medicines, and deciding appropriate dosing. Pharmacy teams were considered important facilitators in the response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feedback on prescribing in reduced kidney function can encourage improvement but is not sufficient alone. Systematized CrCl calculation and coding may improve patient safety by facilitating decision support for prescribing, review, and audit/research. A rigorous, larger-scale effectiveness evaluation is likely to be feasible and acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creatinine clearance, reduced kidney function, and optimizing prescribing safety through practice feedback: a mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Su I Wood, Robbie Foy, Paul Carder, Stella Johnson, Duncan Petty, Sarah L Alderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmaf062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney function declines with age, increasing risk of harm from raised blood levels of many medicines. Prescribing is often inappropriate for older people with reduced creatinine clearance (CrCl).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the feasibility and acceptability of providing performance feedback to increase CrCl calculation and coding and reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We delivered evidence-based feedback on CrCl coding and prescribing for common medicines requiring dose adjustment in renal impairment. This mixed-methods study in seven UK general practices collected data at three time points for evidence-based feedback (October 2021, December 2021, February 2022) and additionally pre-/post-feedback intervention. An institutional ethnography explored responses. We observed and conducted semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians. We thematically analysed qualitative data, guided by Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean CrCl coding for ≥75s rose from 46% to 50.4% (difference 4.4%; range -10.5% to 14.7%). The number of patients with CrCl-associated inappropriate prescribing fell. We observed in 6 settings and interviewed 11 clinicians. Feedback engaged practices, was seen as important and allowed flexible action. All feedback cycle components were evident. Participants mentioned difficulties in remembering to consider kidney function, calculating and coding CrCl, recalling relevant medicines, and deciding appropriate dosing. Pharmacy teams were considered important facilitators in the response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feedback on prescribing in reduced kidney function can encourage improvement but is not sufficient alone. Systematized CrCl calculation and coding may improve patient safety by facilitating decision support for prescribing, review, and audit/research. A rigorous, larger-scale effectiveness evaluation is likely to be feasible and acceptable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾功能随着年龄的增长而下降,许多药物的血药浓度升高会增加危害的风险。对于肌酐清除率(CrCl)降低的老年人,处方通常不合适。目的:探讨提供绩效反馈以增加CrCl计算和编码,减少潜在不当处方的可行性和可接受性。方法:对肾损害患者需要调整剂量的常用药物的CrCl编码和处方进行循证反馈。这项混合方法研究在七个英国全科实践中收集了三个时间点的数据,用于基于证据的反馈(2021年10月、2021年12月、2022年2月)和额外的反馈前/后干预。一种制度人种学探讨了这些反应。我们观察并对初级保健临床医生进行了半结构化访谈。在临床表现反馈干预理论的指导下,我们对定性数据进行了专题分析。结果:≥75s的平均CrCl编码从46%上升到50.4%(差异4.4%,范围-10.5% ~ 14.7%)。与crcl相关的不当处方患者数量下降。我们在6个环境中观察并采访了11名临床医生。反馈涉及实践,被认为是重要的,并允许灵活的行动。所有反馈循环的组成部分都很明显。参与者提到了记住考虑肾功能、计算和编码CrCl、召回相关药物和决定适当剂量的困难。药房工作队被认为是应对工作中的重要促进者。结论:对肾功能下降患者的处方反馈可促进肾功能的改善,但仅靠处方反馈是不够的。系统化的CrCl计算和编码可以通过促进处方、审查和审计/研究的决策支持来提高患者安全。一个严格的、更大规模的有效性评价可能是可行和可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creatinine clearance, reduced kidney function, and optimizing prescribing safety through practice feedback: a mixed methods study.

Background: Kidney function declines with age, increasing risk of harm from raised blood levels of many medicines. Prescribing is often inappropriate for older people with reduced creatinine clearance (CrCl).

Objective: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of providing performance feedback to increase CrCl calculation and coding and reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing.

Methods: We delivered evidence-based feedback on CrCl coding and prescribing for common medicines requiring dose adjustment in renal impairment. This mixed-methods study in seven UK general practices collected data at three time points for evidence-based feedback (October 2021, December 2021, February 2022) and additionally pre-/post-feedback intervention. An institutional ethnography explored responses. We observed and conducted semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians. We thematically analysed qualitative data, guided by Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory.

Results: Mean CrCl coding for ≥75s rose from 46% to 50.4% (difference 4.4%; range -10.5% to 14.7%). The number of patients with CrCl-associated inappropriate prescribing fell. We observed in 6 settings and interviewed 11 clinicians. Feedback engaged practices, was seen as important and allowed flexible action. All feedback cycle components were evident. Participants mentioned difficulties in remembering to consider kidney function, calculating and coding CrCl, recalling relevant medicines, and deciding appropriate dosing. Pharmacy teams were considered important facilitators in the response.

Conclusions: Feedback on prescribing in reduced kidney function can encourage improvement but is not sufficient alone. Systematized CrCl calculation and coding may improve patient safety by facilitating decision support for prescribing, review, and audit/research. A rigorous, larger-scale effectiveness evaluation is likely to be feasible and acceptable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信