Baraa Ghani Abdulraheem, Ali Azeez Al-Jumaili, Safa Mohammed Shaukat Mohammed Khalid
{"title":"伊拉克血友病经济负担的综合衡量:一项实地研究。","authors":"Baraa Ghani Abdulraheem, Ali Azeez Al-Jumaili, Safa Mohammed Shaukat Mohammed Khalid","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2558090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the economic burden of hemophilia A, B, and A with inhibitors, including direct medical, non-medical, and indirect costs from both governmental and patient perspectives.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective cost-of-illness analysis was conducted at a public hospital in Baghdad, Iraq serving hemophilia patients. Government costs were derived from medical records, while patient out-of-pocket expenses were gathered via interviews. Data were collected from November 2024 to March 2025. One-way ANOVA tested cost differences across hemophilia types and severity levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Ministry of Health spent US$11.30 million annually on 446 hemophilia patients (average $25,312 per patient), with clotting-factor replacement comprising 70.6% of the costs. On-demand treatment accounted for 84.5% of the hospitalization expenses. Patients with hemophilia-A-with-inhibitors incurred the highest annual cost ($113,651), followed by hemophilia-B and hemophilia-A-without-inhibitors cases. Severe cases and comorbidities like hepatitis C further increased spending. Non-medical costs averaged $440.33, and indirect costs $281.42 per patient. School absenteeism totaled 1,753 days across 144 students, averaging 12.2 days each.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clotting-factor replacement remains the primary cost driver in hemophilia care, with inhibitors significantly increasing expenditures. Non-medical and indirect costs add to the overall burden, underscoring the need for prophylaxis and access to innovative therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive measurement of hemophilia economic burden in Iraq: a field-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Baraa Ghani Abdulraheem, Ali Azeez Al-Jumaili, Safa Mohammed Shaukat Mohammed Khalid\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2558090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the economic burden of hemophilia A, B, and A with inhibitors, including direct medical, non-medical, and indirect costs from both governmental and patient perspectives.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective cost-of-illness analysis was conducted at a public hospital in Baghdad, Iraq serving hemophilia patients. Government costs were derived from medical records, while patient out-of-pocket expenses were gathered via interviews. Data were collected from November 2024 to March 2025. One-way ANOVA tested cost differences across hemophilia types and severity levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Ministry of Health spent US$11.30 million annually on 446 hemophilia patients (average $25,312 per patient), with clotting-factor replacement comprising 70.6% of the costs. On-demand treatment accounted for 84.5% of the hospitalization expenses. Patients with hemophilia-A-with-inhibitors incurred the highest annual cost ($113,651), followed by hemophilia-B and hemophilia-A-without-inhibitors cases. Severe cases and comorbidities like hepatitis C further increased spending. Non-medical costs averaged $440.33, and indirect costs $281.42 per patient. School absenteeism totaled 1,753 days across 144 students, averaging 12.2 days each.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clotting-factor replacement remains the primary cost driver in hemophilia care, with inhibitors significantly increasing expenditures. Non-medical and indirect costs add to the overall burden, underscoring the need for prophylaxis and access to innovative therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2558090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2558090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comprehensive measurement of hemophilia economic burden in Iraq: a field-based study.
Background: This study assessed the economic burden of hemophilia A, B, and A with inhibitors, including direct medical, non-medical, and indirect costs from both governmental and patient perspectives.
Research design and methods: A retrospective cost-of-illness analysis was conducted at a public hospital in Baghdad, Iraq serving hemophilia patients. Government costs were derived from medical records, while patient out-of-pocket expenses were gathered via interviews. Data were collected from November 2024 to March 2025. One-way ANOVA tested cost differences across hemophilia types and severity levels.
Results: The Ministry of Health spent US$11.30 million annually on 446 hemophilia patients (average $25,312 per patient), with clotting-factor replacement comprising 70.6% of the costs. On-demand treatment accounted for 84.5% of the hospitalization expenses. Patients with hemophilia-A-with-inhibitors incurred the highest annual cost ($113,651), followed by hemophilia-B and hemophilia-A-without-inhibitors cases. Severe cases and comorbidities like hepatitis C further increased spending. Non-medical costs averaged $440.33, and indirect costs $281.42 per patient. School absenteeism totaled 1,753 days across 144 students, averaging 12.2 days each.
Conclusion: Clotting-factor replacement remains the primary cost driver in hemophilia care, with inhibitors significantly increasing expenditures. Non-medical and indirect costs add to the overall burden, underscoring the need for prophylaxis and access to innovative therapies.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.