生物仿制药在胃肠病学中的疗效和安全性:关注炎症性肠病的管理。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-11 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2025.2557626
Fruzsina Balogh, Dorottya Angyal, Adam Varga, Lorant Gonczi, Livia Lontai, Akos Ilias, Peter L Lakatos
{"title":"生物仿制药在胃肠病学中的疗效和安全性:关注炎症性肠病的管理。","authors":"Fruzsina Balogh, Dorottya Angyal, Adam Varga, Lorant Gonczi, Livia Lontai, Akos Ilias, Peter L Lakatos","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2557626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of biosimilars changed the management of biologicals in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) since the approval of CT-P13, the first biosimilar to infliximab, by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in September 2013 and by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2016. Accumulating evidence in IBD suggests that biosimilar products have equivalent efficacy and safety to reference products and their use was associated with improved access and decrease in medication costs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review discusses the current evidence on approved biosimilars of infliximab, adalimumab and ustekinumab in IBD. Authors review data on drug sustainability, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, non-medical switch data and interchangeability of biosimilar agents.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The biosimilar concept seems to be successful and has led to increased use of biological/biosimilar agents in the treatment of IBD. Clinical trials with biosimilars in IBD and evidence from real world studies on infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars confirm that safety, efficacy and immunogenicity is comparable to the originator, and that switching from the originator or among biosimilars is safe. While payers are supporting mandatory biosimilar use, on the long run the price race can lead to obstacles and unaffordability of the development of new originator biological agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"967-978"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of biosimilars in gastroenterology: a focus on inflammatory bowel disease management.\",\"authors\":\"Fruzsina Balogh, Dorottya Angyal, Adam Varga, Lorant Gonczi, Livia Lontai, Akos Ilias, Peter L Lakatos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2025.2557626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of biosimilars changed the management of biologicals in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) since the approval of CT-P13, the first biosimilar to infliximab, by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in September 2013 and by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2016. Accumulating evidence in IBD suggests that biosimilar products have equivalent efficacy and safety to reference products and their use was associated with improved access and decrease in medication costs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review discusses the current evidence on approved biosimilars of infliximab, adalimumab and ustekinumab in IBD. Authors review data on drug sustainability, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, non-medical switch data and interchangeability of biosimilar agents.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The biosimilar concept seems to be successful and has led to increased use of biological/biosimilar agents in the treatment of IBD. Clinical trials with biosimilars in IBD and evidence from real world studies on infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars confirm that safety, efficacy and immunogenicity is comparable to the originator, and that switching from the originator or among biosimilars is safe. While payers are supporting mandatory biosimilar use, on the long run the price race can lead to obstacles and unaffordability of the development of new originator biological agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"967-978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2557626\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2557626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2013年9月欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和2016年4月美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准首个英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药CT-P13以来,生物仿制药的引入改变了炎症性肠病(IBD)生物制剂的管理。越来越多的IBD证据表明,生物仿制药与参考产品具有同等的疗效和安全性,其使用与改善可及性和降低药物成本有关。涵盖领域:本综述讨论了目前批准的IBD英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗和乌斯特金单抗生物仿制药的证据。作者回顾了药物可持续性、有效性、安全性、免疫原性、非医疗切换数据和生物仿制药的互换性等方面的数据。专家意见:生物类似药的概念似乎是成功的,并导致生物/生物类似药在IBD治疗中的使用增加。IBD生物类似药的临床试验以及英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗生物类似药的现实研究证据证实,安全性、有效性和免疫原性与原药相当,并且从原药或生物类似药之间切换是安全的。虽然支付款人支持强制性生物仿制药的使用,但从长远来看,价格竞争可能会导致开发新的原产生物制剂的障碍和负担能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of biosimilars in gastroenterology: a focus on inflammatory bowel disease management.

Introduction: The introduction of biosimilars changed the management of biologicals in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) since the approval of CT-P13, the first biosimilar to infliximab, by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in September 2013 and by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2016. Accumulating evidence in IBD suggests that biosimilar products have equivalent efficacy and safety to reference products and their use was associated with improved access and decrease in medication costs.

Areas covered: This review discusses the current evidence on approved biosimilars of infliximab, adalimumab and ustekinumab in IBD. Authors review data on drug sustainability, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, non-medical switch data and interchangeability of biosimilar agents.

Expert opinion: The biosimilar concept seems to be successful and has led to increased use of biological/biosimilar agents in the treatment of IBD. Clinical trials with biosimilars in IBD and evidence from real world studies on infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars confirm that safety, efficacy and immunogenicity is comparable to the originator, and that switching from the originator or among biosimilars is safe. While payers are supporting mandatory biosimilar use, on the long run the price race can lead to obstacles and unaffordability of the development of new originator biological agents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信