脊髓病颈椎前路手术术中神经监测的应用:警戒发生率、干预措施和预后价值。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sydney Rucker, Robert J Ferdon, Gabriella Rivas, Jessica Barley, Jeffrey Korte, John Glaser, Charles Reitman, James Lawrence, Robert Ravinsky
{"title":"脊髓病颈椎前路手术术中神经监测的应用:警戒发生率、干预措施和预后价值。","authors":"Sydney Rucker, Robert J Ferdon, Gabriella Rivas, Jessica Barley, Jeffrey Korte, John Glaser, Charles Reitman, James Lawrence, Robert Ravinsky","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy in informing intraoperative interventions.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The routine use of IONM in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy remains controversial, with poorly defined indications and limited evidence validating protocols for managing intraoperative alerts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred ninety-one anterior cervical spine cases with continuous IONM from 2021 to 2025 were included, excluding revisions and nondegenerative conditions. The incidence of IONM alert was recorded for both myelopathic (n=111) and non-myelopathy (n=80) groups. Alerts were characterized by associated surgical event, intraoperative interventions, duration and resolution, and correlation with new postoperative deficit. Patient demographic and procedural variables, including total monitoring time and blood pressure fluctuations, were assessed for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative alerts occurred in 42 patients, with a higher incidence of alert in the myelopathic group (28, 25.2%) than the non-myelopathic group (14, 17.5%) (P = 0.220). The most common event at the time of alert was instrumentation (30%) followed by decompression (27%) and patient positioning (21%). Intraoperative interventions in response to alerts included increased stimulation parameters, anesthetic adjustment, patient repositioning, or reversal of last surgical maneuver. Alerts in the myelopathic group were more likely to remain unresolved at closing [P = 0.007159; OR = 5.718, 95% CI (1.369, 29.523)] and associated with a lower positive predictive value for new postoperative deficit (0.29 vs. 0.50). Total monitoring time was the only variable significantly associated with alert incidence (P = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Myelopathic patients experienced a higher incidence of IONM alerts and were significantly more likely to have unresolved alerts at closure. However, alerts demonstrated limited predictive value for new postoperative deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Anterior Cervical Spine Procedures for Myelopathy: Alert Incidence, Interventions, and Prognostic Value.\",\"authors\":\"Sydney Rucker, Robert J Ferdon, Gabriella Rivas, Jessica Barley, Jeffrey Korte, John Glaser, Charles Reitman, James Lawrence, Robert Ravinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy in informing intraoperative interventions.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The routine use of IONM in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy remains controversial, with poorly defined indications and limited evidence validating protocols for managing intraoperative alerts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred ninety-one anterior cervical spine cases with continuous IONM from 2021 to 2025 were included, excluding revisions and nondegenerative conditions. The incidence of IONM alert was recorded for both myelopathic (n=111) and non-myelopathy (n=80) groups. Alerts were characterized by associated surgical event, intraoperative interventions, duration and resolution, and correlation with new postoperative deficit. Patient demographic and procedural variables, including total monitoring time and blood pressure fluctuations, were assessed for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative alerts occurred in 42 patients, with a higher incidence of alert in the myelopathic group (28, 25.2%) than the non-myelopathic group (14, 17.5%) (P = 0.220). The most common event at the time of alert was instrumentation (30%) followed by decompression (27%) and patient positioning (21%). Intraoperative interventions in response to alerts included increased stimulation parameters, anesthetic adjustment, patient repositioning, or reversal of last surgical maneuver. Alerts in the myelopathic group were more likely to remain unresolved at closing [P = 0.007159; OR = 5.718, 95% CI (1.369, 29.523)] and associated with a lower positive predictive value for new postoperative deficit (0.29 vs. 0.50). Total monitoring time was the only variable significantly associated with alert incidence (P = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Myelopathic patients experienced a higher incidence of IONM alerts and were significantly more likely to have unresolved alerts at closure. However, alerts demonstrated limited predictive value for new postoperative deficits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001911\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性研究。目的:探讨术中神经监测(IONM)在颈前路脊髓病手术中的应用,为术中干预提供信息。背景资料总结:IONM在脊髓病颈椎前路手术中的常规应用仍然存在争议,适应症定义不清,术中警报管理的证据验证方案有限。方法:纳入2021年至2025年期间持续IONM的191例颈椎前路病例,不包括翻修和非退行性疾病。脊髓病组(n=111)和非脊髓病组(n=80)均记录了IONM警报的发生率。警报的特征包括相关的手术事件、术中干预、持续时间和消退,以及与新的术后缺陷的相关性。评估患者人口统计学和程序变量,包括总监测时间和血压波动是否存在混淆。结果:42例患者术中出现警戒,脊髓病组(28例,25.2%)高于非脊髓病组(14例,17.5%)(P = 0.220)。警报时最常见的事件是内固定(30%),其次是减压(27%)和患者体位(21%)。术中应对警报的干预措施包括增加刺激参数、麻醉调整、患者重新定位或逆转上次手术操作。脊髓病组的警报在结束时更有可能保持未解决[P = 0.007159;OR = 5.718, 95% CI(1.369, 29.523)],并与术后新发缺陷的较低阳性预测值相关(0.29对0.50)。总监测时间是唯一与警戒发生率显著相关的变量(P = 0.0004)。结论:脊髓病患者经历了更高的IONM警报发生率,并且在关闭时更有可能出现未解决的警报。然而,警报对新的术后缺陷的预测价值有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Anterior Cervical Spine Procedures for Myelopathy: Alert Incidence, Interventions, and Prognostic Value.

Study design: Retrospective review.

Objective: Examine the utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy in informing intraoperative interventions.

Summary of background data: The routine use of IONM in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy remains controversial, with poorly defined indications and limited evidence validating protocols for managing intraoperative alerts.

Methods: One hundred ninety-one anterior cervical spine cases with continuous IONM from 2021 to 2025 were included, excluding revisions and nondegenerative conditions. The incidence of IONM alert was recorded for both myelopathic (n=111) and non-myelopathy (n=80) groups. Alerts were characterized by associated surgical event, intraoperative interventions, duration and resolution, and correlation with new postoperative deficit. Patient demographic and procedural variables, including total monitoring time and blood pressure fluctuations, were assessed for confounding.

Results: Intraoperative alerts occurred in 42 patients, with a higher incidence of alert in the myelopathic group (28, 25.2%) than the non-myelopathic group (14, 17.5%) (P = 0.220). The most common event at the time of alert was instrumentation (30%) followed by decompression (27%) and patient positioning (21%). Intraoperative interventions in response to alerts included increased stimulation parameters, anesthetic adjustment, patient repositioning, or reversal of last surgical maneuver. Alerts in the myelopathic group were more likely to remain unresolved at closing [P = 0.007159; OR = 5.718, 95% CI (1.369, 29.523)] and associated with a lower positive predictive value for new postoperative deficit (0.29 vs. 0.50). Total monitoring time was the only variable significantly associated with alert incidence (P = 0.0004).

Conclusions: Myelopathic patients experienced a higher incidence of IONM alerts and were significantly more likely to have unresolved alerts at closure. However, alerts demonstrated limited predictive value for new postoperative deficits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信