Sivi Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan, Tessa Hosman, Italo Poggesi, Eva Vets, Freya Rasschaert, Jay Ariyawansa, Jaya Natarajan, Maroesja van Nimwegen-Velthuis, Andrea Vaclavkova, Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo, Tatiana Sidorenko
{"title":"Ponesimod和心得安联合应用对健康成人心率、心脏安全性和药代动力学影响的随机试验","authors":"Sivi Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan, Tessa Hosman, Italo Poggesi, Eva Vets, Freya Rasschaert, Jay Ariyawansa, Jaya Natarajan, Maroesja van Nimwegen-Velthuis, Andrea Vaclavkova, Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo, Tatiana Sidorenko","doi":"10.1111/cts.70341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this phase 1 study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and cardiac effect following administration of ponesimod (a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator) and propranolol in healthy adults. In treatment period (TP) 1, participants received ponesimod (2 mg). In TP2, if resting heart rate (HR) was ≥ 55 bpm, the ponesimod up-titration regimen was initiated. Participants were randomized to TP2A (placebo plus ponesimod up-titration) or TP2B (80 mg propranolol plus ponesimod up-titration). Concomitant administration resulted in an increased bradyarrhythmic effect on HR versus ponesimod alone. The mean maximum difference in mean hourly HR from time-matched baseline for TP2B compared with TP2A during the first 12 h post-dose was −12.4 bpm. This was observed after the first dose of ponesimod, persisted for the first 4 doses, then decreased to −7.4 bpm post-up-titration. The lowest mean of the HR<sub>nadir</sub> in TP2B was 48.9 bpm (95% CI: 46.4–51.3). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of 1st degree AV block between groups and no occurrences of 2nd or higher degree AV block. No clinically relevant changes were observed in the PK of ponesimod or propranolol. Overall, 88.5% of participants experienced ≥ 1 AE during the study. In TP2, the most reported TEAEs (≥ 5%) considered related to ponesimod were fatigue (12 [25.5%]) and dizziness (10 [21.3%]). No deaths were reported. Co-administration of ponesimod with propranolol resulted in a greater HR-lowering effect compared to ponesimod alone, without significant changes in PK parameters or serious cardiac adverse events in healthy adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70341","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Trial on the Combined Effect of Ponesimod and Propranolol on Heart Rate, Cardiac Safety, and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adults\",\"authors\":\"Sivi Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan, Tessa Hosman, Italo Poggesi, Eva Vets, Freya Rasschaert, Jay Ariyawansa, Jaya Natarajan, Maroesja van Nimwegen-Velthuis, Andrea Vaclavkova, Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo, Tatiana Sidorenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of this phase 1 study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and cardiac effect following administration of ponesimod (a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator) and propranolol in healthy adults. In treatment period (TP) 1, participants received ponesimod (2 mg). In TP2, if resting heart rate (HR) was ≥ 55 bpm, the ponesimod up-titration regimen was initiated. Participants were randomized to TP2A (placebo plus ponesimod up-titration) or TP2B (80 mg propranolol plus ponesimod up-titration). Concomitant administration resulted in an increased bradyarrhythmic effect on HR versus ponesimod alone. The mean maximum difference in mean hourly HR from time-matched baseline for TP2B compared with TP2A during the first 12 h post-dose was −12.4 bpm. This was observed after the first dose of ponesimod, persisted for the first 4 doses, then decreased to −7.4 bpm post-up-titration. The lowest mean of the HR<sub>nadir</sub> in TP2B was 48.9 bpm (95% CI: 46.4–51.3). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of 1st degree AV block between groups and no occurrences of 2nd or higher degree AV block. No clinically relevant changes were observed in the PK of ponesimod or propranolol. Overall, 88.5% of participants experienced ≥ 1 AE during the study. In TP2, the most reported TEAEs (≥ 5%) considered related to ponesimod were fatigue (12 [25.5%]) and dizziness (10 [21.3%]). No deaths were reported. Co-administration of ponesimod with propranolol resulted in a greater HR-lowering effect compared to ponesimod alone, without significant changes in PK parameters or serious cardiac adverse events in healthy adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70341\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Randomized Trial on the Combined Effect of Ponesimod and Propranolol on Heart Rate, Cardiac Safety, and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adults
The objective of this phase 1 study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and cardiac effect following administration of ponesimod (a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator) and propranolol in healthy adults. In treatment period (TP) 1, participants received ponesimod (2 mg). In TP2, if resting heart rate (HR) was ≥ 55 bpm, the ponesimod up-titration regimen was initiated. Participants were randomized to TP2A (placebo plus ponesimod up-titration) or TP2B (80 mg propranolol plus ponesimod up-titration). Concomitant administration resulted in an increased bradyarrhythmic effect on HR versus ponesimod alone. The mean maximum difference in mean hourly HR from time-matched baseline for TP2B compared with TP2A during the first 12 h post-dose was −12.4 bpm. This was observed after the first dose of ponesimod, persisted for the first 4 doses, then decreased to −7.4 bpm post-up-titration. The lowest mean of the HRnadir in TP2B was 48.9 bpm (95% CI: 46.4–51.3). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of 1st degree AV block between groups and no occurrences of 2nd or higher degree AV block. No clinically relevant changes were observed in the PK of ponesimod or propranolol. Overall, 88.5% of participants experienced ≥ 1 AE during the study. In TP2, the most reported TEAEs (≥ 5%) considered related to ponesimod were fatigue (12 [25.5%]) and dizziness (10 [21.3%]). No deaths were reported. Co-administration of ponesimod with propranolol resulted in a greater HR-lowering effect compared to ponesimod alone, without significant changes in PK parameters or serious cardiac adverse events in healthy adults.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.