Daniel M. Cushman, Luke A. Johnson, Taylor Burnham, Richard Nelson, Jamie Egbert, Robert Burnham
{"title":"低成本富血小板血浆治疗膝关节骨关节炎的评估:一项初步研究","authors":"Daniel M. Cushman, Luke A. Johnson, Taylor Burnham, Richard Nelson, Jamie Egbert, Robert Burnham","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the characteristics and effectiveness of low-cost platelet-rich plasma (LC-PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating its composition and effect on pain, function, satisfaction, safety and cost-effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV evidence single-arm prospective cohort pilot study of 20 subjects (30 knees total) with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Two LC-PRP injections were performed, 3 weeks apart. Platelet extraction/yield, patient-reported outcomes and incidence of adverse events were assessed with a primary endpoint of 6 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis of LC-PRP compared to corticosteroid injection was conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>On average, this LC-PRP preparation method allowed for recovery of 85% of platelets. Significant mean differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (total, pain and function) and global assessment score were observed at all follow-up points compared to baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). Satisfaction was noted in 90% of patients at 6 months and 75% of patients at 12 months. No significant adverse events were reported. LC-PRP was less costly ($654 vs. $1308) and yielded more QALYs (0.846 vs. 0.708) than corticosteroid injections. Per injection costs were estimated to be $10 for corticosteroid and $11 for LC-PRP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study demonstrates that LC-PRP ($11) may significantly benefit patients with knee OA. LC-PRP appears to be a safe, cost-effective means for improving pain and function in knee OA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel M. Cushman, Luke A. Johnson, Taylor Burnham, Richard Nelson, Jamie Egbert, Robert Burnham\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the characteristics and effectiveness of low-cost platelet-rich plasma (LC-PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating its composition and effect on pain, function, satisfaction, safety and cost-effectiveness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level IV evidence single-arm prospective cohort pilot study of 20 subjects (30 knees total) with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Two LC-PRP injections were performed, 3 weeks apart. Platelet extraction/yield, patient-reported outcomes and incidence of adverse events were assessed with a primary endpoint of 6 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis of LC-PRP compared to corticosteroid injection was conducted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>On average, this LC-PRP preparation method allowed for recovery of 85% of platelets. Significant mean differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (total, pain and function) and global assessment score were observed at all follow-up points compared to baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). Satisfaction was noted in 90% of patients at 6 months and 75% of patients at 12 months. No significant adverse events were reported. LC-PRP was less costly ($654 vs. $1308) and yielded more QALYs (0.846 vs. 0.708) than corticosteroid injections. Per injection costs were estimated to be $10 for corticosteroid and $11 for LC-PRP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This pilot study demonstrates that LC-PRP ($11) may significantly benefit patients with knee OA. LC-PRP appears to be a safe, cost-effective means for improving pain and function in knee OA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level IV.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70420\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study
Purpose
To assess the characteristics and effectiveness of low-cost platelet-rich plasma (LC-PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating its composition and effect on pain, function, satisfaction, safety and cost-effectiveness.
Methods
Level IV evidence single-arm prospective cohort pilot study of 20 subjects (30 knees total) with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Two LC-PRP injections were performed, 3 weeks apart. Platelet extraction/yield, patient-reported outcomes and incidence of adverse events were assessed with a primary endpoint of 6 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis of LC-PRP compared to corticosteroid injection was conducted.
Results
On average, this LC-PRP preparation method allowed for recovery of 85% of platelets. Significant mean differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (total, pain and function) and global assessment score were observed at all follow-up points compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). Satisfaction was noted in 90% of patients at 6 months and 75% of patients at 12 months. No significant adverse events were reported. LC-PRP was less costly ($654 vs. $1308) and yielded more QALYs (0.846 vs. 0.708) than corticosteroid injections. Per injection costs were estimated to be $10 for corticosteroid and $11 for LC-PRP.
Conclusions
This pilot study demonstrates that LC-PRP ($11) may significantly benefit patients with knee OA. LC-PRP appears to be a safe, cost-effective means for improving pain and function in knee OA.