低成本富血小板血浆治疗膝关节骨关节炎的评估:一项初步研究

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Daniel M. Cushman, Luke A. Johnson, Taylor Burnham, Richard Nelson, Jamie Egbert, Robert Burnham
{"title":"低成本富血小板血浆治疗膝关节骨关节炎的评估:一项初步研究","authors":"Daniel M. Cushman,&nbsp;Luke A. Johnson,&nbsp;Taylor Burnham,&nbsp;Richard Nelson,&nbsp;Jamie Egbert,&nbsp;Robert Burnham","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the characteristics and effectiveness of low-cost platelet-rich plasma (LC-PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating its composition and effect on pain, function, satisfaction, safety and cost-effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV evidence single-arm prospective cohort pilot study of 20 subjects (30 knees total) with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Two LC-PRP injections were performed, 3 weeks apart. Platelet extraction/yield, patient-reported outcomes and incidence of adverse events were assessed with a primary endpoint of 6 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis of LC-PRP compared to corticosteroid injection was conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>On average, this LC-PRP preparation method allowed for recovery of 85% of platelets. Significant mean differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (total, pain and function) and global assessment score were observed at all follow-up points compared to baseline (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). Satisfaction was noted in 90% of patients at 6 months and 75% of patients at 12 months. No significant adverse events were reported. LC-PRP was less costly ($654 vs. $1308) and yielded more QALYs (0.846 vs. 0.708) than corticosteroid injections. Per injection costs were estimated to be $10 for corticosteroid and $11 for LC-PRP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study demonstrates that LC-PRP ($11) may significantly benefit patients with knee OA. LC-PRP appears to be a safe, cost-effective means for improving pain and function in knee OA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel M. Cushman,&nbsp;Luke A. Johnson,&nbsp;Taylor Burnham,&nbsp;Richard Nelson,&nbsp;Jamie Egbert,&nbsp;Robert Burnham\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the characteristics and effectiveness of low-cost platelet-rich plasma (LC-PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating its composition and effect on pain, function, satisfaction, safety and cost-effectiveness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level IV evidence single-arm prospective cohort pilot study of 20 subjects (30 knees total) with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Two LC-PRP injections were performed, 3 weeks apart. Platelet extraction/yield, patient-reported outcomes and incidence of adverse events were assessed with a primary endpoint of 6 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis of LC-PRP compared to corticosteroid injection was conducted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>On average, this LC-PRP preparation method allowed for recovery of 85% of platelets. Significant mean differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (total, pain and function) and global assessment score were observed at all follow-up points compared to baseline (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). Satisfaction was noted in 90% of patients at 6 months and 75% of patients at 12 months. No significant adverse events were reported. LC-PRP was less costly ($654 vs. $1308) and yielded more QALYs (0.846 vs. 0.708) than corticosteroid injections. Per injection costs were estimated to be $10 for corticosteroid and $11 for LC-PRP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This pilot study demonstrates that LC-PRP ($11) may significantly benefit patients with knee OA. LC-PRP appears to be a safe, cost-effective means for improving pain and function in knee OA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level IV.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70420\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价低成本富血小板血浆(LC-PRP)治疗膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)的特点和疗效,评价其组成及对疼痛、功能、满意度、安全性和成本-效果的影响。方法对20例(共30个膝关节)轻度至中度膝关节炎患者进行IV级证据单臂前瞻性队列研究。LC-PRP注射两次,间隔3周。血小板提取/产量、患者报告的结局和不良事件发生率以6个月为主要终点进行评估。对LC-PRP与皮质类固醇注射进行了成本-效果分析。结果LC-PRP制备方法平均回收率为85%。Western Ontario和McMaster university的骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分(总、疼痛和功能)和总体评估评分在所有随访点与基线相比均有显著差异(1、3、6和12个月p <; 0.05)。90%的患者在6个月时满意,75%的患者在12个月时满意。无明显不良事件报道。LC-PRP比皮质类固醇注射成本更低(654美元对1308美元),产生更多的qaly(0.846美元对0.708美元)。皮质类固醇的每次注射费用估计为10美元,LC-PRP为11美元。这项初步研究表明LC-PRP($11)可能对膝关节OA患者有显著的益处。LC-PRP似乎是一种安全,经济有效的方法来改善膝关节OA的疼痛和功能。证据等级四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study

An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study

An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study

An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study

An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study

Purpose

To assess the characteristics and effectiveness of low-cost platelet-rich plasma (LC-PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating its composition and effect on pain, function, satisfaction, safety and cost-effectiveness.

Methods

Level IV evidence single-arm prospective cohort pilot study of 20 subjects (30 knees total) with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Two LC-PRP injections were performed, 3 weeks apart. Platelet extraction/yield, patient-reported outcomes and incidence of adverse events were assessed with a primary endpoint of 6 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis of LC-PRP compared to corticosteroid injection was conducted.

Results

On average, this LC-PRP preparation method allowed for recovery of 85% of platelets. Significant mean differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (total, pain and function) and global assessment score were observed at all follow-up points compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). Satisfaction was noted in 90% of patients at 6 months and 75% of patients at 12 months. No significant adverse events were reported. LC-PRP was less costly ($654 vs. $1308) and yielded more QALYs (0.846 vs. 0.708) than corticosteroid injections. Per injection costs were estimated to be $10 for corticosteroid and $11 for LC-PRP.

Conclusions

This pilot study demonstrates that LC-PRP ($11) may significantly benefit patients with knee OA. LC-PRP appears to be a safe, cost-effective means for improving pain and function in knee OA.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信